European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 23–31 | Cite as

Dental erosion, prevalence and risk factors among a group of adolescents in Stockholm County

  • M. Skalsky Jarkander
  • M. Grindefjord
  • K. Carlstedt
Open Access
Original Scientific Article

Abstract

Aims

To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of dental erosion (DE) among a group of adolescents in Stockholm County.

Materials and methods

This cross sectional cohort study was conducted at three clinics of the Public Dental Service in Stockholm County. Fifteen and 17 year old adolescents (1335) who scheduled their regular dental health examination were asked to participate. After drop-outs a sample of 1071 individuals, 547 males and 524 females were enrolled in the study. Presence of erosive wear was diagnosed (yes/no) on marker teeth by trained dentists/dental hygienists and photographs were taken. The adolescents answered a questionnaire regarding oral symptoms, dietary and behavioural factors. Two calibrated specialist dentists performed evaluation of the photographs for severity of DE using a modified version of the Simplified Erosion Partial Recording System (SEPRS).

Results

DE was clinically diagnosed in 28.3% of 15 years old and 34.3% of 17 years old. Severe erosive wear (grade 3 and 4 according to SEPRS) was found in 18.3% of the adolescents based upon the intra-oral photographs. DE was more prevalent and severe among males than females. Clinically diagnosed erosive lesions correlated significantly with soft drink consumption (p < 0.001), the use of juice or sport drinks as a thirst quencher after exercise (p = 0.006) and tooth hypersensitivity when eating and drinking (p = 0.012). Furthermore, self-assessed gastric reflux was a factor strongly associated with DE (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The study indicated that DE was common among adolescents in Stockholm County and associated with both internal and external risk factors.

Keywords

Dental erosion Prevalence Risk factors Adolescents 

Introduction

Dental erosion (DE) is defined as an irreversible loss of dental hard tissue caused by a chemical process that does not involve bacteria (Lussi and Ganss 2014). It is a multifactorial condition of growing concern that often occurs together with other forms of tooth wear, such as attrition caused by contact between teeth, and abrasion caused by any material with abrasive effect (Holbrook et al. 2003).

The aetiological factors of DE can be divided into ‘external’ and ‘internal’ causes. External causes include acid influence through food intake, certain medications, and work-related factors. A lifestyle with a diet containing more fruits and vegetables, sports drinks during exercise but especially an increased intake of fruit juices and soft drinks are the main exogenous causes of DE among today’s children and that both a healthy and unhealthy lifestyle can contribute to susceptibility for erosive wear (Johansson et al. 2012a; Mulic et al. 2012; Isaksson et al. 2013; Hasselkvist et al. 2014). Internal causes including diseases that cause acidic stomach contents to reach the oral cavity such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (Wilder-Smith et al. 2015) or eating disorders with repeated vomiting (Lussi et al. 2006; Otsu et al. 2014). Reflux disease can be present without subjective symptoms, so-called ‘silent reflux’, and should always be suspected in idiopathic DE. Johansson and co-workers (2012b) showed in their study that “DE is about 8.5 times more common in patients with eating disorders”.

The global prevalence of DE in children and adolescents shows great variation with rates ranging from 7.2% (Vargas-Ferreira et al. 2011) to 95% (Al-Majed et al. 2002). A systematic review estimated an overall worldwide prevalence of tooth erosion to be 30% in permanent teeth of children and adolescents aged 8–19 years (Salas et al. 2015a). In European countries 24% (Truin et al. 2005) to 64% (Dugmore and Rock 2004a) of young people are reported to have dental erosive wear and corresponding figures for Scandinavian countries are 12–75% (Hasselkvist et al. 2010; Isaksson et al. 2013; Mulic et al. 2013; Sövik et al. 2014).

The wide prevalence range found in these studies may be explained by a variety of factors such as non-homogeneous groups of divergent ages, different examination standards, diagnostic criteria, endpoints and also groups from various social areas. The clinical index of choice for DE detection also plays a very important role in this variability (Muller-Bolla et al. 2015).

DE seems to increase with age, and to become more severe over time. In a cohort of 12 years old, a longitudinal study from UK reported new or more advanced lesions in 27% of the children over the 2 years of the study (Dugmore and Rock 2003). Another 3 year longitudinal study conducted in The Netherlands among a cohort of 10-12 years old, showed a steady progression of DE in children with erosive wear (El Aidi et al. 2011).

The relationship between the prevalence of DE and socio-economic status is contradictory. Several studies have claimed that children with low socio-economic status have a higher prevalence of DE (Al-Dlaigan et al. 2001; Dugmore and Rock 2003; El Aidi et al. 2010) while other research groups reported the opposite (van Rijkom et al. 2002; Bardsley et al. 2004; Luo et al. 2005).

The fact that DE seems to be an increasing problem in children and adolescents and may cause extensive loss of tooth substance that require complicated and expensive restorative treatments, makes it essential for clinicians to pay attention to this condition. An early diagnosis provides opportunities to influence and change eating and drinking habits, to detect medical causes of DE (Carvalho et al. 2014; Peutzfeldt et al. 2014) and to be able to implement necessary preventive measures. It is also of great importance to investigate the prevalence and severity of DE in the population to raise awareness and focus among clinicians and other health care professionals on this condition.

There is a lack of studies, evaluating the prevalence of DE in Sweden and no study regarding DE has been carried out in the region of the capital of Sweden. Hence, the aims of this study was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of DE among a group of adolescents in Stockholm County.

Materials and methods

The present study was conducted during 2010–2011 and designed as a cross sectional cohort study. Three clinics in Stockholm County with populations from different socioeconomic levels that included urban and suburban areas were selected as being representative of the socio-economic levels of the population in this part of Sweden. In Stockholm County there are about 22,000 15 and 17 years old respectively and approximately 75% are patients in the Public Dental Service. From the computerised recall system, 1335 adolescents (15 and 17 years of age) that were going to schedule their regular dental health examination were selected in consecutive order.

The present study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm, Sweden (Dnr: 2010/1836-31/3). All procedures performed in this study involving humans were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Swedish adolescents 15 years of age are allowed to decide themselves whether to participate and all subjects were informed of their right to resign before or during the study. Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in the study.

Study population

Of the original cohort of 1335 individuals, 547 males and 524 females (n = 1071) were enrolled in the study. In Brommaplan there were 166 15 years olds and 174 17 years old, in Sollentuna 195 and 201 and in Södertälje 159 and 176 respectively. The reasons for non-participation were absence from examination (n = 76), relocation (n = 4) and decline to participate (n = 53). One hundred thirty-one individuals were excluded because of incomplete registrations concerning the presence of DE (Brommaplan n = 29, Sollentuna n = 10 and Södertälje n = 92). In the second part of the study when severity of DE was graded on the photographs taken at the regular dental health examination; the study group consisted of 1202 patients (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Study population and number of subjects in each phase of the study

Informational meetings and the dental team

Participating dentists, dental hygienists and dental nurses at the three selected clinics attended an informational session and a lecture on dental erosive wear by the main author (MSJ) prior to the data collection period. They were also trained regarding how to perform clinical photographs in an accurate way, with practical exercises (MSJ). A book with pictures of DE was distributed to the clinicians as reference material (Johansson and Carlsson 2006).

Clinical examination and questionnaire

The regular dental health examination followed a routine protocol and radiographs were taken for individual reasons. In addition, the presence of erosive wear on maxillary incisors palatally and mandibular first molars occlusally, was diagnosed by a dentist or dental hygienist at the clinic. The examination was carried out in dental clinics with modern equipment and optimal lighting and teeth were dried with compressed air prior to the clinical evaluation. Teeth with extensive caries, restorations or with fixed appliances were excluded from the screening of DE. Three photographs were taken of the marker teeth for erosive wear. One was taken of the maxillary incisors in a palatal view and one of each mandibular first molar in an occlusal view.

All subjects completed a questionnaire with an extended history regarding tooth sensitivity, oral hygiene habits, consumption of erosive drinks (carbonated, juice, sport drinks) as well as questions about lifestyle factors (computer proficiency, training, etc.) (Table 1). The photographs and questionnaires were coded at each clinic and transferred to the manager, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Eastman Institute.
Table 1

Questionnaire comprising 19 questions

1. Hypersensitivity of teeth

Yes or no

2. If symptoms, when occurring

When brushing teeth or when consuming food and/or drink

3. Consumption of Coca-Cola or other soft-drinks

Several times a day, several times a week, more seldom

4. Consumption of juice or sport drinks

Several times a day, several times a week, more seldom

5. Consumption of juice at breakfast

Yes or no

6. Juice or sport drink as thirst quencher after exercise

Yes or no

7. Consumption of fruit

More than three times a day, more seldom

8. Consumption of apples

More than three times a day, more seldom

9. Consumption of citrus fruits

More than three times a day, more seldom

10. Computing

More than 3 h a day, less than 3 h a day, not every day

11. Exercise frequency

Every day, several times a week, more seldom

12. Self-assessed gastric reflux

Yes or no

13. If yes, how often

Daily, several times a week

14. Intake of fluoride tablets

Yes or no

15. Tooth brushing frequency

More than two times a day, two times a day, more seldom

16. Tooth brushing before and/or after breakfast

Before breakfast, after breakfast, before and after breakfast

17. Use of chewing gum

Daily, once a week, more seldom

18. Use of mouthwash

Yes or no

19. If yes, what kind of mouthwash

With fluoride, without fluoride

Diagnostic criteria for severity of DE

Maxillary incisors and mandibular first molars were chosen because these teeth are known to be highly susceptible to DE. It has also been shown that using marker teeth for DE yields savings in time and reliable results. Hasselkvist and co-workers showed that a Simplified Erosion Partial Recording System (SEPRS) using four permanent surfaces 11, 21 palatal and 36, 46 occlusal gave excellent sensitivity and specificity in relation to scoring of all maxillary canines/incisors and first permanent molars (Johansson et al. 1996; Hasselkvist et al. 2010).

The severity of DE on the palatal surfaces of 12–22, diagnosed via clinical photographs, was graded on a 5-point scale according to the erosion index developed by Johansson et al. (1996) (Table 2). The severity of molar cuppings on the occlusal surfaces of 36 and 46, diagnosed via clinical photographs, were recorded according to a separate scale, constructed by Hasselkvist et al. (2010) (Table 3). The index used in this study was a modified version of the SEPRS. It has the same grading but registration is performed on six surfaces instead of four, 12–22 palatal view and 36, 46 occlusal view. The two scales for incisors and molars were combined based on the highest erosion grades scored on palatal surfaces on anterior teeth and occlusal surfaces on madibular first molars. Erosion scores were: no erosion (score 0), mild erosion (score 1), moderate erosion (score 2), severe erosion (score 3) and very severe erosion (score 4). The highest scores from the recording of maxillary anterior teeth and mandibular first molars were used to determine the total erosion score at an individual level. Qualifying for score 4 meant that there was at least one tooth surface of the maxillary anterior teeth graded 4 (Table 2) or a molar occlusal surface with cupping score 4 (Table 3).
Table 2

Ordinal scale used for grading severity of dental erosion on lingual surfaces of maxillary incisors (Johansson et al. 1996)

Grade

Criteria

0

No visible changes, developmental structures remain, macro-morphology intact

1

Smoothened enamel, developmental structures have totally or partially vanished. Enamel surface is shiny, matt, irregular, ‘melted’, rounded or flat, macro-morphology generally intact

2

Enamel surface as described in grade 1. Macro-morphology clearly changed, faceting or concavity formation within the enamel, no dentinal exposure

3

Enamel surface as described in grades 1 and 2. Macro-morphology greatly changed (close to dentinal exposure of large surfaces) or dentin surface exposed by ≤ 1/3

4

Enamel surface as described in grades 1, 2 and 3. Dentin surface exposed by > 1/3 or pulp visible through the dentin

This scale was used for grading severity of dental erosion via intra-oral photographs

Table 3

Ordinal scale used for grading cuppings on occlusal surfaces of mandibular first permanent molars (Hasselkvist et al. 2010)

Grade

Criteria

0

No cupping/intact cusp tip

1

Rounded cusp tipa

2

Cupping ≤ 1 mm

3

Cupping > 1 mm

4

Fused cuppings: at least two cuppings are fused together on the same tooth

aChanged morphology compared to the assumed original anatomy at the time of eruption. This scale was used for grading cuppings via intra-oral photographs

All colour photographs were examined by two calibrated specialist Paediatric dentists (MSJ, KC) at the Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Eastman Institute, Stockholm.

Calibration

Two of the authors at the Department of Paediatric Dentistry who were going to grade DE via the intra-oral photographs were calibrated prior to the grading. Each dentist examined the same photographs from 38 adolescents (228 surfaces). In case of any uncertainty about the severity of the lesions the lower score was selected. To establish the intra-examiner agreement, the photographs were re-examined 14–21 days after the initial examination. The third examination was performed by the two dentists together in order to determine inter-examination agreement. The mean inter-examiner reliability on a surface-by-surface basis on photographs was 0.50 (Kw), indicating moderate agreement, while the mean intra-examiner was 0.91(Kw), indicating a very good level of agreement (Altman 1995). To improve the inter-examiner agreement before the study the dentists examined photographs from the first 20 patients once again and in case of disagreement compared the erosions on photographs with graded dental erosion according to the literature (Johansson and Carlsson 2006).

Statistical analysis

Sample size calculation, with 90% power and a 5% significance level, resulted in a minimum of 900 patients, to detect a 10% difference in erosion between the three clinics in pair wise comparisons (3 × 300 = 900). The calculation was based on 20% prevalence of DE (Hasselkvist et al. 2010).

The distribution of DE by clinics and age groups (15 vs. 17 years) were compared using the Chi square test. Differences between the two age groups and between groups with different background factors for DE were calculated and considered significant at p < 0.05 (Table 4).
Table 4

Bivariate logistic regression predicting dental erosion

Factor

Beta

SE

p

OR (CI)

Age (15 vs 17 years)

0.281

0.132

0.034

1.32 (1.30, 1.35)

Male gender

0.285

0.132

0.031

1.33 (1.31, 1.35)

Tooth hypersensitivity

0.376

0.150

0.012

1.46 (1.42, 1.49)

Frequency of soft drinks (3 categoriesa)

  

< 0.001

 

Frequency of juice (3 categoriesa)

  

NS

 

Juice at breakfast

0.183

0.132

NS

1.20 (1.18, 1.22)

Drinking after exercise

0.553

0.170

0.006

1.74 (1.69, 1.79)

Frequency of fruits > 3 times/day

0.347

0.156

0.027

1.41 (1.38, 1.45)

Frequency of apples > 3 times/day

0.561

0.243

0.021

1.75 (1.65, 1.86)

Frequency of citrus > 3 times/day

0.091

0.251

NS

1.10 (1.08, 1.17)

Time at computer (3 categoriesa)

  

NS

 

Reflux

1.04

0.264

< 0.001

2.84 (2.64, 3.03)

Natrium Fluoride rinse

0.518

0.319

NS

1.68 (1.52, 1.86)

Frequency of tooth brushing (3 categoriesa)

  

NS

 

Tooth brushing adjacent to breakfast -

    

(3 categoriesa)

  

NS

 

Frequency of chewing gum (3 categoriesa)

  

NS

 

Mouthwash

− 0.085

0.164

NS

0.98 (0.89, 0.94)

Mouthwash type (2 categoriesa)

  

NS

 

Beta regression coefficient, SE standard error, P probability value, CI confidence interval (95%)

aQuestionnaire, Table 1

Data analyses were carried out using Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS, Version 22). For continuous variables, the mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and an independent t test were used to compare the mean values on erosion. For categorical variables, a bivariate analysis of associations between the categorical variables on erosion was compared using the Chi Square test.

The multivariate analysis was performed on factors with significant influence on ‘erosion’ in the bivariate analyses. Multiple logistic regression with a forward stepwise procedure was used to evaluate the factors of ‘independent’ importance, accounted for in the ‘multivariate’ table (Table 5). Bi-and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The ORs with 95% CI were used as estimates of the effects.
Table 5

Multiple logistic regressions predicting dental erosion. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI)

Factor

Beta

SE

p

OR

CI

Age 17 vs. 15 years

0.273

0.136

0.045

1.31

1.01–1.71

Freq.soft drinks not often vs. several times a week

0.487

0.136

< 0.001

1.63

1.25–2.13

Drinking after exercise

0.479

0.175

0.006

1.61

1.15–2.28

Reflux

1.009

0.268

< 0.001

2.74

1.62–4.64

Constant

− 1.296

0.122

   

Beta regression coefficient, SE standard error, P probability value, CI confidence interval (95%)

Results

Prevalence of clinically diagnosed dental erosion

Out of 1071 adolescents studied, DE was registered in 336 individuals (31.4%). DE was more frequent among 17 year old where erosive wear was diagnosed in 189 (34.3%) adolescents compared to 147 (28.3%) in 15 year olds. Erosive wear was more common in males, 188 individuals (34.4%) showed DE and 148 (28.2%) in females. The highest frequency of DE was found in Sollentuna, with 177 adolescents (44.5%) followed by Brommaplan, 88 (25.9%) and Södertälje 71 (21.3%) individuals respectively.

Clinically diagnosed dental erosion and risk factors

Consumption of soft drinks several times a week was more prevalent in individuals with DE than in those with no erosion (p < 0.001). The use of juice or soft drinks as a thirst quencher after exercise was also more common in adolescents with DE (p = 0.006). The occurrence of erosive wear was higher in individuals with tooth hypersensitivity (p = 0.012). Self-assessed gastric reflux was strongly associated with DE (p < 0.001)(Table 4). The probability of DE increased with the number of risk factors present, starting with 21.5% at baseline to 72.2% with all predictors identified for DE present (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Cumulative percentage probability of dental erosion. 1. None of the predictors, identified in this study present; 2. age (17 years); 3. age + soft drinks several times a week; 4. age + soft drinks several times a week + juice or sport drink after exercise; 5. age + soft drinks several times a week + juice or sport drink after exercise + reflux

Prevalence of dental erosion grades 3 and 4 in photographs

Among 1202 individuals erosive lesions grade 3 or 4 according to the photographs were registered in at least one of the four maxillary incisors or lower first molars among 220 adolescents representing one fifth of the adolescents. Males had a higher frequency of DE grades 3 and 4 with 136 individuals (22.3%) showing severe erosive wear compared to 84 females (14.4%) (p < 0.01). In addition, 17 year olds had higher frequencies of severe erosive wear with 134 individuals diagnosed with DE grade 3 and 4 (20.7%) compared to 86 (15.5%) 15 years old (p = 0.015).

Discussion

In this study almost one-third of the group of the 15- and 17 year old adolescents in Stockholm County had erosive lesions and that the presence of DE could be linked to external risk factors such as soft drink and juice consumption and internal risk factors such as reflux and also to tooth hypersensitivity. These findings emphasise the need for a national epidemiological scoring system for DE as well as for linked preventive programmes to be implemented.

Adolescents from three areas in Stockholm County with a different social profile were examined in order to try to identify if DE was more common in certain social groups in society. Some 75% of the 15 and 17 years old in Stockholm County are patients in the Public Dental Service. This may probably indicate that adolescents visiting the Public Dental Service reflects the oral problems of the youth population in these areas.

The 15 and 17 years old adolescents were selected for the present study for several reasons. At these ages, selected marker teeth have been present in the mouth for approximately 9 and 11 years and thus exposed to erosive challenges. Further these ages are standard ages for regular dental health examinations in Sweden and they also represent groups when individual eating and drinking habits are changing from parenthood to more independence. The 17 year old adolescents have a more established free individual lifestyle reflecting social factors, dietary habits etc. Finally there is a higher probability of finding erosive lesions only in adolescents, as attrition and abrasion are less common compared with older individuals (Van’t Spijker et al. 2009).

Epidemiological studies on DE have shown a wide range of prevalence (Jaeggi and Lussi 2006).

In the present study, 31.4% of the individuals showed signs of erosive wear, 28.3% of the 15 years old and 34.3% of the 17 years old. Arnadottir et al. (2010) concluded that DE was seen in approximately 31% of 15 years old and in the systematic review by Salas et al. (2015a) the estimated prevalence of tooth erosion in children and adolescents 8–19 years was 30.4%. Mulic et al. (2013) found erosive wear in 38% among 18 years old. These studies represent various diagnostic methods and different age groups and countries. The frequency range of DE is in accordance with the present study.

Severe erosive wear (DE grades 3 and 4) was found in 18.3% of the individuals based upon the intra-oral photographs in the present study. That was consistent with 18% extensive erosion that Isaksson et al. (2013) found among 20 years old and in another Swedish study by Hasselkvist et al. (2010) where the corresponding figure for 18 and 19 years old was 22.3%. Different ages, groups studied and/or scoring systems used can explain the differences in prevalence between these studies. One a specific scoring method for measurement of erosive wear, clear in criteria and reproducible, is needed. Various scales and scoring systems in different studies created problems when comparing the prevalence figures (Huysmans et al. 2011; Milosevic 2011).

In the present study DE was more common in 17 year olds (34.3%) than in 15 year olds (28.3%). Severe erosive wear (grades 3 and 4) was also more prevalent in 17 year olds (20.7%) compared to 15 year olds (15.5%). Longitudinal studies conducted by Dugmore and Rock (2003) and El Aidi et al. (2010), reported rising prevalence rates with increasing age. Hasselkvist et al. (2016) found that progression of erosive lesions in Swedish adolescents aged 13–14 years followed to age 17–18 years was common and related to lifestyle factors. These findings support the present study showing that DE is more frequent and more severe in the group of 17 year olds.

Males had significantly more erosive wear (34.4%) than females (28.2%) in the present study. Severe DE among males was 22.3% compared to females 14.4%, based upon intra-oral photographs. Gender differences regarding presence and severity of DE, showing that males had higher prevalence figures and more lesions into dentine than females, has been reported previously (Dugmore and Rock 2003; Hasselkvist et al. 2010, 2014; Mulic et al. 2013).

Many studies have confirmed an association between DE and soft drink consumption among adolescents (Johansson et al. 2002; Dugmore and Rock 2004b; Jensdottir et al. 2004; Mulic et al. 2012; Isaksson et al. 2013; Hasselkvist et al. 2014; Muller-Bolla et al. 2015; Salas et al. 2015b). These results corresponded with the results of the present study where DE was more common in subjects drinking soft drinks several times a week. In the present study, we also found an association between erosive wear and drinking juice or sport drinks after exercise thus indicating that erosive wear can be linked to the lifestyle of young people. This was in line with data reported by Myklebust et al. (2003) in which consumption of juices and soft drinks during exercise appeared to be part of the aetiology of DE in young recruits. Further, Frese et al. (2015) found that endurance training resulted an increased risk for DE caused by a decrease in salivary flow rates during maximum workload.

The estimated probability for DE in this study was 21.5% even though none of the predictors for DE were present (Fig. 2). Other factors that may influence the presence of DE are e.g. individual susceptibility, differences in the enamel composition due to polymorphisms in enamel formation genes, variation in the pellicle, and variation in the saliva content (Schlueter and Tveit 2014; Sövik et al. 2015; Uhlen et al. 2016). Also, other acidic sources than the ones identified in the present study questionnaire may have existed.

Tooth hypersensitivity was more common in adolescents with DE. This finding was consistent with Shitsuka et al. (2015) showing that the presence of DE was associated with the occurrence of dentine hypersensitivity in children. The results were also in line with Olley et al. (2015) reporting that tooth wear, predominately active erosive wear, was important in the aetiology of dentine hypersensitivity on occlusal/incisal tooth surfaces. Furthermore, dentine hypersensitivity is more likely initiated if subjects had consumed acidic beverages more recently. Persons with regular or abusive consumption of soft drinks, persons living on a special diet, and persons suffering from endogenous erosion are at particular risk for the development of severe DE and for the development of hypersensitivity. Adequate prophylaxis for DE will prevent hypersensitivity but sometimes restorative therapy may be necessary to relieve these problems (Schlueter et al. 2012; Peutzfeldt et al. 2014).

Self-assessed gastric reflux was a factor strongly associated with erosive wear in this study. The relationship between DE and GERD has previously been reported in different studies (Holbrook et al. 2009; Mulic et al. 2012; Tantbirojn et al. 2012; Wilder-Smith et al. 2015). The dentist may be the first to observe signs of ‘silent reflux’ or an eating disorder in the form of DE (Ranjitkar et al. 2012; Johansson et al. 2012b). Eating disorders are increasing in contemporary society and younger people are affected, highlighting how important it is for the dentist to be aware of these problems, and to be able to diagnose early erosion in children and adolescents (Campbell and Peebles, 2014).

The present study was conducted at three dental clinics belonging to the Public Dental Service in Stockholm County Council and from different social areas but it was not possible to link DE significantly to adolescents from a certain social group. One possible explanation can be that Södertälje had a higher number of incomplete registrations (n = 92, 70%) than the other two clinics. Previous studies have shown no consensus regarding erosive wear and socio-economics (Al-Dlaigan et al. 2001; Bardsley et al. 2004; El Aidi et al. 2010).

The present study emphasises the importance of early diagnosis of DE to avoid drink hypersensitivity and restorative procedures. Furthermore, it highlights the need for a thorough medical history to clarify both he exogenous and endogenous factors that may influence disease progression. Dental health education and motivation to bring about a lifestyle change is necessary as well as collaboration with medical colleagues in reflux diseases and eating disorders to investigate the causes and to prevent progression of existing lesions.

The present study stresses the importance of registration of erosive wear at the regular dental health examination and to agree on a national and international epidemiologic scoring system. Future studies of dental erosive wear and preventive measures are needed, as there is still a lack of knowledge.

Clinical implication: Clinicians are recommended to focus on this problem to diagnose at an early stage and also to investigate the cause of DE that often can be explained by exogenous factors such as a frequent consumption of acidic drinks but also endogenous causes such as reflux disease and eating disorders. A close collaboration with medical professionals in these areas is essential for referral of patients. Appropriate preventive and restorative measures must also be provided depending on the severity of erosion damage and check ups on a regular basis to avoid further loss of tooth material.

Conclusions

The present study indicates that dental erosions is a common problem among adolescents of today and are linked to both internal and external risk factors. The present study also emphasises the importance of early diagnosis.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Bo Nilsson, for skilful performance of the statistical analyses. The clinicians at the Public Dental Services are acknowledged for their excellent collaboration. This project was supported by Grants from The Public Dental Service, Stockholm County Council, Praktikertjänst AB, The Female Dentist Club and The Swedish Association for Pediatric Dentistry. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author contributions

MSJ. Contributed to design, acquisition and coordination. Managed database, performed statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. MG. Contributed to conception and design and recruitment of patients. KC. Contributed to design and drafting of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Al-Dlaigan YH, Shaw L, Smith AJ. Dental erosion in a group of British 14-year-old school children Part I: prevalence and influence of differing socioeconomic backgrounds. Br Dent J. 2001;190:145–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Majed I, Maguire A, Murray JJ. Risk factors for dental erosion in 5–6 year old and 12–14 year old boys in Saudi Arabia. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002;30:38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1995.Google Scholar
  4. Arnadottir IB, Holbrook WP, Eggertsson H. Prevalence of dental erosion: a national survey. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010;38:521–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardsley PF, Taylor S, Milosevic A. Epidemiological studies of tooth wear and dental erosion in 14-year-old children in North West England, part 1; the relationship with water fluoridation and social deprivation. Br Dent J. 2004;197:413–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell K, Peebles R. Eating disorders in children and adolescents: state of the art review. Pediatrics. 2014;134:582–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carvalho TS, Lussi A, Jaeggi T. Erosive tooth wear in children. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:262–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dugmore CR, Rock WP. The progression of tooth erosion in a cohort of adolescents of mixed ethnicity. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003;13:295–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dugmore CP, Rock WP. The prevalence of tooth erosion in 12-year-old children. Br Dent J. 2004a;196:279–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dugmore CR, Rock WP. A multifactorial analysis of factors associated with dental erosion. Br Dent J. 2004b;196:283–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. El Aidi H, Bronkhorst EM, Huysmans MC. Dynamics of tooth erosion in adolescents: a 3-year longitudinal study. J Dent. 2010;38:131–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. El Aidi H, Bronkhorst EM, Huysmans MC. Multifactorial analysis of factors associated with the incidence and progression of erosive tooth wear. Caries Res. 2011;45:303–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Frese C, Frese F, Kuhlmann S. Effect of endurance training on dental erosion, caries, and saliva. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25:319–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hasselkvist A, Johansson A, Johansson AK. Dental erosion and soft drink consumption in Swedish children and adolescents and the development of a simplified erosion partial recording system. Swed Dent J. 2010;34:187–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hasselkvist A, Johansson A, Johansson AK. Association between soft drink consumption, oral health and some lifestyle factors in Swedish adolescents. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72:1039–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hasselkvist A, Johansson A, Johansson AK. A 4 year prospective longitudinal study of progression of dental erosion associated to lifestyle in 13–14 year-old Swedish adolescents. J Dent. 2016;47:55–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Holbrook WP, Arnadottir IB, Kay EJ. Prevention. Part 3: prevention of tooth wear. Br Dent J. 2003;195:75–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Holbrook WP, Furuholm J, Gudmundsson K. Gastric reflux is a significant causative factor of tooth erosion. J Dent Res. 2009;88:422–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Huysmans MCDNJM, Chew HP, Ellwood RP. Clinical studies of dental erosion and erosive wear. Caries Res. 2011;45:60–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Isaksson H, Birkhed D, Wendt L-K. Prevalence of dental erosion and association with lifestyle factors in Swedish 20-year olds. Acta Odont Scand. 2013;72:448–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaeggi T, Lussi A. Prevalence, incidence and distribution of erosion. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;20:44–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jensdottir T, Arnadottir IB, Thorsdottir I. Relationship between dental erosion, soft drink consumption, and gastroesophageal reflux among Icelanders. Clin Oral Investig. 2004;8:91–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Johansson AK, Johansson A, Birkhed D. Dental erosion, soft-drink intake, and oral health in young Saudi men, and development of a system for assessing erosive anterior tooth wear. Acta Odontol Scand. 1996;54:369–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Johansson AK, Lingström P, Birkhed D. Comparison of factors potentially related to the occurrence of dental erosion in high- and low-erosion groups. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110:204–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Johansson AK, Carlsson GE. Dental erosion: bakgrund och kliniska aspekter (in Swedish). 1st ed. Stockholm: Förlagshuset Gothia; 2006.Google Scholar
  26. Johansson AK, Omar R, Carlsson GE. Dental erosion and its growing importance in clinical practice: from past to present. Int J Dent. 2012a;2012:632907.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Johansson AK, Norring C, Unell L. Eating disorders and oral health: a matched case-control study. Eur J Oral Sci. 2012b;120:61–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Luo Y, Zeng XJ, Du MQ. The prevalence of dental erosion in preschool children in China. J Dent. 2005;33:115–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lussi A, Hellwig E, Zero D. Erosive tooth wear: diagnosis, risk factors and prevention. Am J Dent. 2006;19:319–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lussi A, Ganss C. Erosive tooth wear from diagnosis to therapy. 2nd ed. Basel: Karger; 2014.Google Scholar
  31. Milosevic A. The problem with an epidemiological index for dental erosion. Br Dent J. 2011;211:201–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mulic A, Skudutyte-Rysstad R, Tveit AB. Risk indicators for dental erosive wear among 18-year-old subjects in Oslo, Norway. Eur J Oral Sci. 2012;120:531–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mulic A, Tveit AB, Skaare AB. Prevalence and severity of dental erosive wear among a group of Norwegian 18-year-olds. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:475–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Muller-Bolla M, Courson F, Small-Faugeron V. Dental erosion in French adolescents. BMC Oral Health. 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0133-4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Myklebust S, Espelid I, Svalestad S. Dental health behavior, gastroesophageal disorders and dietary habits among Norwegian recruits in 1990 and 1999. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003;61:100–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Olley RC, Moazzez R, Bartlett D. The relationship between incisal/occlusal wear, dentine hypersensitivity and time after the last acid exposure in vivo. J Dent. 2015;43:248–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Otsu M, Hamura A, Ishikawa Y. Factors affecting the dental erosion severity of patients with eating disorders. Bio Psych Soc Med. 2014;8:25–31.Google Scholar
  38. Peutzfeldt A, Jaeggi T, Lussi A. Restorative therapy of erosive lesions. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:253–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ranjitkar S, Kaidonis JA, Smales RJ. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and tooth erosion. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:479850.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Salas MMS, Nascimento GG, Huysmans MC. Estimated prevalence of erosive tooth wear in permanent teeth of children and adolescents: an epidemiological systematic review and meta-regression analysis. J Dent. 2015a;43:42–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Salas MMS, Nascimento GG, Vargas-Ferreira F. Diet influenced tooth erosion prevalence in children and adolescents: results of a meta-analysis and meta-regression. J Dent. 2015b;43:865–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schlueter N, Jaeggi T, Lussi A. Is dental erosion really a problem? Adv Dent Res. 2012;24:68–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Schlueter N, Tveit AB. Prevalence of erosive tooth wear in risk groups. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:74–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Shitsuka C, Mendes FM, Corrêa MSNP. Exploring some aspects associated with dentine hypersensitivity in children. Sci World J. 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/764905.Google Scholar
  45. Sövik JB, Tveit AB, Storesund T. Dental erosion: a widespread condition nowadays? A cross-sectional study among a group of adolescents in Norway. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72:523–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sövik JB, Vieira A, Tveit AB. Enamel formation genes associated with dental erosive wear. Caries Res. 2015;49:236–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tantbirojn D, Pintado MR, Versluis A. Quantitative analysis of tooth surface loss associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a longitudinal clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012;143:278–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Truin GJ, van Rijkom HM, Mulder J. Caries trends 1996–2002 among 6- and 12-year-old children and erosive wear prevalence among 12-year-old children in The Hague. Caries Res. 2005;39:2–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Uhlen MM, Mulic A, Holme B. The susceptibility to dental erosion differs among individuals. Caries Res. 2016;50:117–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. van Rijkom HM, Truin GJ, Frencken JEFM. Prevalence, distribution and background variables of smooth-bordered tooth wear in teenagers. Caries Res. 2002;36:147–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Van’t Spijker A, Rodriguez JM, Kreulen CM. Prevalence of tooth wear in adults. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22:35–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Vargas-Ferreira F, Praetzel JR, Ardenghi TM. Prevalence of tooth erosion an associated factors in 11–14-year-old Brazilian school children. J Public Health Dent. 2011;71:6–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilder-Smith CL, Materna A, Martig L. Gastro-oesophageal reflux is common in oligosymptomatic patients with dental erosion: a pH-impedance and endoscopic study. Unit Eur Gastro J. 2015;3:174–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatric DentistryPublic Dental ServiceStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Divisions of Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Dental MedicineKarolinska InstitutetSolnaSweden
  3. 3.Centre for Pediatric Oral Health ResearchStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Clinical OdontologyUniversity of TromsöTromsöNorway

Personalised recommendations