Abstract
Objective
To determine whether malocclusion influences adolescents’ perception when judging their colleagues from the aspects of athletics, social and health status, leadership and academic skills.
Methodology
Front view photographs of the smile of eight adolescent volunteers (non-ideal smile) were altered to create an image with aligned teeth (ideal smile). Two parallel groups were programmed with the subjects’ photographs. When the image of an ideal smile of one of the subjects appeared in one of the groups, the image of the non-ideal appeared in the other. Two hundred adolescents were evaluators, half of the students being from private and half from public schools. They classified the group images indicating their social perception with respect to skills in sports, leadership, academic activities, popularity and the health conditions of each subject.
Results
The majority of photographs of subjects with an ideal smile were evaluated as being better when compared with photographs of the non-ideal smile. The differences in the evaluations between the ideal and non-ideal smiles were significant for the perception of popularity, intelligence, leadership capability and health, differently from the performance in sports, as this aspect did not attain statistical relevance.
Conclusions
Malocclusion has influence on the perception of adolescents of different social levels when judging youngsters with or without malocclusion from the aspects of athletics, social and health status, leadership and academic skills.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajayi EO. Dental aesthetic self-perception and desire for orthodontic treatment among school children in Benin City, Nigeria. Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2011;21(1):45–9.
Arrow P, Brennan DS, Spencer J. Social acceptability of dental appearance and benefits of fixed orthodontic treatment: a 17-year observational cohort study. J Public Health Dent. 2012;72(2):135–42.
Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E. What is beautiful is good. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972;24(3):285–90.
Henson ST, Lindauer SJ, Gardner WG, Shroff B, Tufekci E, Best AM. Influence of dental esthetics on social perceptions of adolescents judged by peers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140(3):389–95.
Jeremiah HG, Bister D, Newton JT. Social perceptions of adults wearing orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(5):476–82.
Kaku M, Kojima S, Sumi H et al. Gummy smile and facial profile correction using miniscrew anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(1):170–7.
Kerosuo H, Hausen H, Laine T, Shaw WC. The influence of incisal malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J Orthod. 1995;17(6):505–12.
Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ et al. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull. 2000;126(3):390–423.
Lombardo L, Berveglieri C, Guarneri MP, Siciliani G. Anterior dental alignment and smile: perception and sensations in a sample of 8- to 10-year-old children and their parents. Orthodontics (Chic). 2011;12(4):366–77.
Mandall NA, Vine S, Hulland R, Worthington HV. The impact of fixed orthodontic appliances on daily life. Community Dent Health. 2006;23(2):69–74.
Naini FB, Donaldson AN, McDonald F, Cobourne MT. Assessing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114(3):303–11.
Peres KG, Traebert ESA, Marcenes W. Diferenças entre autopercepção e critérios normativos na identificação das oclusopatias. Rev Saúde Pública. 2002;36(2):230–6.
Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza MA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(6):748–53.
Pithon MM, Santos AM, Couto FS et al. Perception of the esthetic impact of mandibular incisor extraction treatment on laypersons, dental professionals, and dental students. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(4):732–8.
Shaw WC. The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod. 1981;79(4):399–415.
Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles CR. The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod. 1985;87(1):21–6.
Singh V, Hamdan A, Rock P. The perception of dental aesthetics and orthodontic treatment need by 10- to 11-year-old children. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34(5):646-51.
Tabeleao VP, Tomasi E, Neves SF. Quality of life and burnout among public high school and primary school teachers in Southern Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2011;27(12):2401–8.
Thomas M, Reddy R, Reddy BJ. Perception differences of altered dental esthetics by dental professionals and laypersons. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(2):242–7.
Valo TS. Anterior esthetics and the visual arts: beauty, elements of composition, and their clinical application to dentistry. Curr Opin Cosmet Dent. 1995;24–32.
Yi S, Lin XP, Hu RD, Ni ZY. The effect of orthodontic treatment on facial profile of patients with Class II division 1 malocclusions. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2012;21(1):88–93.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pithon, M.M., Andrade, D., Fernandes, I. et al. Influence of malocclusion on social perceptions of adolescents at public and private schools. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 15, 37–43 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-013-0050-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-013-0050-7