Advertisement

Journal of Arid Land

, Volume 10, Issue 6, pp 968–976 | Cite as

Comparing phreatic evaporation at zero water table depth with water surface evaporation

  • Shunjun HuEmail author
  • Yongde Gan
  • Yongbao Chen
Report
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Salt-affected soils are mostly found in irrigated areas within arid and semi-arid regions where the groundwater table is shallow. Soils of this type have become an increasingly severe problem because they threaten both the environment and the sustainable development of irrigated agriculture. A tool to estimate phreatic evaporation is therefore urgently required to minimize the salinization potential of salt-affected areas. In this context, phreatic evaporation at zero water table depth (E0) is a key parameter for establishing a model for calculating phreatic evaporation. The aim of this study was to explore the law of phreatic evaporation and to develop structurally rational empirical models for calculating phreatic evaporation, based on E0 data of six types of soil (i.e., gravel, fine sand, sandy loam, light loam, medium loam, and heavy loam) observed using the non-weighing lysimeter and water surface evaporation (E601) data observed using a E601 evaporator of same evaporation area with a lysimeter-tube at the groundwater balance station of the Weigan River Management Office in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China, during the non-freezing period (April to October) between 1990 and 1994. The relationship between E0 and E601 was analyzed, the relationship between the ratio of E0 to E601 and the mechanical compositions of different soils was presented, and the factors influencing E0 were discussed. The results of this study reveal that E0 is not equal to E601. In fact, only values of the former for fine sand are close to those of the latter. Data also show that E0 values are related to soil texture as well as to potential atmospheric evaporation, the ratio of E0 to E601 and the silt-clay particle content (grain diameter less than 0.02 mm) is negatively exponentially correlated, and that soil thermal capacity plays a key role in phreatic evaporation at E0. The results of this analysis therefore imply that the treatment of zero phreatic depth is an essential requirement when constructing groundwater balance stations to study the law of phreatic evaporation.

Keywords

phreatic evaporation water table depth water surface evaporation soil texture soil thermal capacity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41671032, U1303181), the Key Special Project of National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0501401), and the National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB429902).

References

  1. Averianov S F. 1956. Seepage from irrigation canals and its influence on regime of ground water table. In: Kostiakov A N, Favorin N N, Averianov S F. Influence of Irrigation Systems on Regime of Ground Water. Moscow: Academic Press, 140–151. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. Blight G E. 2002. Measuring evaporation from soil surfaces for environmental and geotechnical purposes. Water SA, 28(4): 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen T F, Wang X S, Li H L, et al. 2013. Redistribution of groundwater evapotranspiration and water table around a well field in an unconfined aquifer: A simplified analytical model. Journal of Hydrology, 495: 162–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chung S O, Horton R. 1987. Soil heat and water flow with a partial surface mulch. Water Resources Research, 23(12): 2175–2186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook F J, Rassam D W. 2002. An analytical model for predicting water table dynamics during drainage and evaporation. Journal of Hydrology, 263(1–4): 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cosby B J, Hornerger G M, Clapp R B, et al. 1984. A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils. Water Resources Research, 20(6): 682–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cui M X. 2006. Agricultural Meteorology. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 64–65. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. De Vries D A. 1963. Thermal properties of soils. In: Van Wijk W R. Physics of Plant Environment. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing, 210–235.Google Scholar
  9. Don J, William P G. 1958. Elements of Applied Hydrology. New York: Ronal Press, 150–151.Google Scholar
  10. Fan S X, Dao Y F, Liu J. 2014. Principles of Hydrology. Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 91–94. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Fang M H. 2009. Environmental Hydrology. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 15. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Guan H. 2010. Hydrology. Beijing: Science Press, 26. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Han B Z, Liu J Z, Fu J W. 2009. Concept of soil evaporation and its determining method. Heilongjiang Science and Technology of Water Conservancy, 37(2): 106. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Hanks R J, Ashcroft G L. 1984. Applied Soil Physics: Soil Water and Temperature Applications. Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 104–106.Google Scholar
  15. Hanks R J. 1992. Applied Soil Physics: Soil Water and Temperature Applications (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlog New York, Inc., 87–88, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hillel D. 1998. Environmental Soil Physics. New York: Academic Press, 514–515.Google Scholar
  17. Hillel D. 2004. Introduction to Environmental Soil Physics. New York: Academic Press, 343–344.Google Scholar
  18. Hu F R, Hou Y G. 1988. Principles of Hydrology. Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 89. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Hu S J, Tian C Y, Song Y D. 2009. Empirical models of calculating phreatic evaporation from bare soil in Tarim River Basin, Xinjiang. Environmental Earth Sciences, 59(3): 663–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huo C R, Wang Y L. 1988. Groundwater Hydrology. Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 104. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Jin G Y. 1982. Evaluation of Groundwater Resources in a Plain Area. Beijing: China Hydraulic Press, 41–47. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Johnson E, Yáñez J, Ortiz C, et al. 2010. Evaporation from shallow groundwater in closed basins in the Chilean Altiplano. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55(4): 624–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jury W A, Gardner W R, Gardner W H. 1991. Soil Physics (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 178–184.Google Scholar
  24. Lal R, Shukla M K. 2004. Principles of Soil Physics. New York: Marcel Dekker, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lei Z D, Yang S X, Xie S C. 1988. Soil-Water Dynamics. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 133–146. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Liang X T. 1992. Principles of Hydrology. Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 99. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  27. Lu Z Q, Pu X G. 2006. Calculating model study of the soil evaporation in the Heilongjiang region. South to North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 4 (Suppl.): 39–41. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Ma Y J, Shen B, Tumaerbay H. 2006. Spacing of drainage ditches in field under the influence of evaporation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 37(10): 1264–1269. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Mao X M, Li M, Shen Y L, et al. 1998. Analysis of the phreatic evaporation in Yarkant River Basin, Xinjiang. Arid Land Geography, 21(3): 44–50. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  30. Moldup P, Olesen T, Schjønning P, et al. 2000. Predicting the gas diffusion coefficient in undisturbed soil from soil water characteristics. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64(1): 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Qu X Y, Zhang Y Y, Su J X, et al. 1983. Phreatic evaporation and calculation of non-stable flow drainage under depth index relations n=3. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, (9): 48–53. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  32. Ridolfi L, D’Odorico P, Laio F, et al. 2008. Coupled stochastic dynamics of water table and soil moisture in bare soil conditions. Water Resources Research, 44(1): 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rui X F. 2014. Principles of Hydrology. Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 114–118. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  34. Saxena G S, Taylor G S, Prankling R E. 1971. Effect of environmental factors on evaporation rates from soils in the presence of a water table. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 19: 23–29.Google Scholar
  35. Shah N, Nachabe M, Ross M. 2007. Extinction depth and evapotranspiration from ground water under selected land covers. Groundwater, 45(3): 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shang S H, Mao X M, Lei Z D. et al. 1999. Inverse-logistic formula for calculation of phreatic evaporation coefficient. Irrigation and Drainage, 18(2): 18–21. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. Shen B, Huang H H. 2015. Principles of Hydrology. Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 66–69. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  38. Shen Z R. 1992. Water resources scientific experiment and research—atmospheric, surface, soil and ground water interactions. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 213–231. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  39. Shi C X. 1959. Land Hydrology. Beijing: Science Press, 215–217. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  40. Shi C X, Liang R J. 1964. Principles of Land Hydrology. Beijing: China Industry Press, 30–31. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  41. Shi W J, Xing X G, Zhang Z H, et al. 2013. Groundwater evaporation from saline soil under plastic mulch with different percentage of open area. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 11(2): 1268–1271.Google Scholar
  42. Shu L C, Tao Y Z. 2009. Groundwater Hydrology. Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 88–90. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  43. Tang D X, Liu Y R, Zhang W S, et al. 1992. Engineering Geology. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 28. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  44. Tang H X, Su Y S, Zhang H P. 1989. Experimental research on phreatic evaporation and improvement of its empirical formula. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 10: 37–44. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  45. Tindall J A, Kunkel J R, Anderson D E. 1999. Unsaturated Zone Hydrology for Scientists and Engineers. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 215, 230–231.Google Scholar
  46. Wang C J. 1993. Calculation and Evaluation of Water Resources. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 147–148. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  47. Wang K. 2016. Soil and Crop Science (4th ed.). Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 18. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  48. Wang Q J. 2016. Soil Physics and Crop Growth Model. Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 87–93. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  49. Wang W Y, Shen B, Li Z L. 1994. Drain-spacing calculation considering influence of evaporation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 120(3): 563–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williams W D. 1987. Salinization of rivers and streams: an important environmental hazard. Ambio, 16(4): 180–185.Google Scholar
  51. Wu H G, Zhang Z M. 1986. Meteorology. Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 159. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  52. Xu W C. 2011. Calculation and Management of Water Resources. Beijing: Science Press, 22–23, 96–97. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  53. Yang F, Zhang G X, Yin X R, et al. 2011. Study on capillary rise from shallow groundwater and critical water table depth of a saline-sodic soil in western Songnen plain of China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 64(8): 2119–2126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yu Q H. 1993. Study of the evaporation of phreatic water in the northeastern margin of Tarim Basin. Xinjiang Geology, 11(3): 246–254. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  55. Zammouri M. 2001. Case study of water table evaporation at Ichkeul Marshes (Tunisia). Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 127(5): 265–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zarei G, Homaee M, Liaghat A M. 2002. An analytical solution of nonsteady evaporation from bare soils with shallow ground water table. Developments in Water Science, 47(2): 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zarei G, Homaee M, Liaghat A M. 2009. Modeling transient evaporation from descending shallow groundwater table based on Brooks-Corey retention function. Water Resources Management, 23(14): 2867–2876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zarei G, Homaee M, Liaghat A M, et al. 2010. A model for soil surface evaporation based on Campbell’s retention curve. Journal of Hydrology, 380(3–4): 356–361.Google Scholar
  59. Zhang C X. 1996. Analysis on relationship between water surface evaporation and phreatic evaporation when phreatic depth is zero for different soils. Water Resources Research, 17(2): 27–28. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  60. Zhang W Z. 1986. New drainage formulas considering delayed gravity response and evaporation from shallow water table. In: Smith K V H, Rycroft D W. Hydraulic Design in Water Resources Engineering: Land drainage. Berlin: Spring-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 35–47.Google Scholar
  61. Zhang W Z. 1996. Groundwater and Soil Water Dynamics. Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 239–242. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  62. Zhang W Z, Shen R K. 1998. Groundwater and Groundwater Control. Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 102–122. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  63. Zhang W Z. 2013. Calculation of Unsteady Flow of Groundwater and Evaluation of Groundwater Resources. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 10–12. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  64. Zheng Z J. 1951. Hydrology. Shanghai: The Commercial Press, 79. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and GeographyChinese Academy of SciencesUrumqiChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River BasinChina Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower ResearchBeijingChina
  3. 3.Central South Institute of Metallurgical GeologyYichangChina

Personalised recommendations