Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of combined drip irrigation and sub-surface pipe drainage on water and salt transport of saline-alkali soil in Xinjiang, China

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developing effective irrigation and drainage strategies to improve the quality of saline-alkali soil is vital for enhancing agricultural production and increasing economic returns. In this study, we explored how irrigation and drainage modes (flood irrigation, drip irrigation, and sub-surface pipe drainage under drip irrigation) improve the saline-alkali soil in Xinjiang, China. We aimed to study the transport characteristics of soil water and salt under different irrigation and drainage modes, and analyze the effects of the combination of irrigation and drainage on soil salt leaching, as well as its impacts on the growth of oil sunflower. Our results show that sub-surface pipe drainage under drip irrigation significantly reduced the soil salt content and soil water content at the 0–200 cm soil depth. Under sub-surface pipe drainage combined with drip irrigation, the mean soil salt content was reduced to below 10 g/kg after the second irrigation, and the soil salt content decreased as sub-surface pipe distance decreased. The mean soil salt content of flood irrigation exceeded 25 g/kg, and the mean soil desalination efficiency was 3.28%, which was lower than that of drip irrigation. The mean soil desalination rate under drip irrigation and sub-surface pipe drainage under drip irrigation was 19.30% and 58.12%, respectively. After sub-surface drainage regulation under drip irrigation, the germination percentage of oil sunflower seedlings was increased to more than 50%, which further confirmed that combined drip irrigation and sub-surface pipe drainage is very effective in improving the quality of saline-alkali soil and increasing the productivity of agricultural crops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aslam M, Prathapar S A. 2006. Strategies to mitigate secondary salinization in the Indus basin of Pakistan: a selective review. Soviet Physics Doklady, 8(1): 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahçeci I, Nacar A S. 2009. Subsurface drainage and salt leaching in irrigated land in south-east Turkey. Irrigation and Drainage, 58(3): 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahçeci I, Nacar A S, Topalhasan L, et al. 2018. A new drainpipe-envelope concept for subsurface drainage systems in irrigated agriculture. Irrigation and Drainage, doi: 10.1002/ird.2247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balwinder Eberbach P L, Humphreys E, et al. 2011. The effect of rice straw mulch on evapotranspiration, transpiration and soil evaporation of irrigated wheat in Punjab, India. Agricultural Water Management, 98(12): 1847–1855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L J, Feng Q. 2013. Soil water and salt distribution under furrow irrigation of saline water with plastic mulch on ridge. Journal of Arid Land, 5(1): 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goins T, Taylor G S. 1959. Drain depth and spacing effects on water removal from a gray-brown podzolic soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 23(6): 413–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan F X. 2012. Mapping QTL saline-alkali tolerance during bud and seeding stage using RIL in maize. MSc Thesis. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover J R, Schwab G O. 1969. Effect of tile depth, spacing, and cropping practices on drain discharge. Transactions of the ASAE, 12: 150–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornbuckle J W, Christen E W, Faulkner R D. 2007. Evaluating a multi-level subsurface drainage system for improved drainage water quality. Agricultural Water Management, 89(3): 208–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Islam S. 1995. Prediction of ground surface temperature and soil moisture content by the force–restore method. Water Resources Research, 31(10): 2531–2539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang D Y. 2012. Study of the quality improvement of the water conservancy engineering construction. Enterprise Science & Technology & Development, 64(10): 962–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jat M L, Gupta R, Saharawat Y S, et al. 2011. Layering precision land leveling and furrow irrigated raised bed planting: productivity and input use efficiency of irrigated bread wheat in Indo-Gangetic plains. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2: 578–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kladivko E J, Grochulska J, Turco R F, et al. 1999. Pesticide and nitrate transport into subsurface tile drains of different spacings. Journal of Environmental Quality, 28(3): 997–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kröger R, Holland M M, Moore M T, et al. 2007. Hydrological variability and agricultural drainage ditch inorganic nitrogen reduction capacity. Journal of Environmental Quality, 36(6): 1646–1652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Library W E. 2015. National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS): Agricultural Chemical Use Database. New York: Agricultural Statistics Board, US Department of Agriculture, 629–2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y G, Yang H C, Wang K Y, et al. 2014. Shallow subsurface pipe drainage in Xinjiang lowers soil salinity and improves cotton seed yield. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 30(16): 84–90. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mai W X, Tian C Y, Li L. 2014. Localized salt accumulation: the main reason for cotton root length decrease during advanced growth stages under drip irrigation with mulch film in a saline soil. Journal of Arid Land, 6(3): 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo Y, Li G, Wang D. 2017. A sowing method for subsurface drip irrigation that increases the emergence rate, yield, and water use efficiency in spring corn. Agricultural Water Management, 179: 288–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriasi D N, Gowda P H, Arnold J G, et al. 2013. Evaluation of the hooghoudt and kirkham tile drain equations in the soil and water assessment tool to simulate tile flow and nitrate-nitrogen. Journal of Environmental Quality, 42(6): 1699–1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijland H J, Croon F W, Ritzema H P. 2005. Subsurface Drainage Practices: Guidelines for the Implementation, Operation and Maintenance of Subsurface Pipe Drainage Systems. ILRI Publication No. 60. Wageningen: Alterra, 150–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou C Y, Chen S C, Wang Y G. 2009. On the enhancement of electroosmotic soil improvement by the injection of saline solutions. Applied Clay Science, 44(1–2): 130–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radu O, Cimpeanu S M, Teodorescu R I, et al. 2017. Technical efficiency of the subsurface drainage on agricultural lands in the moldova river meadow. In: Kulshreshtha S. Current Perspective on Irrigation and Drainage. London: IntechOpen, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall G W, Vetsch J A. 2005. Nitrate losses in subsurface drainage from a corn-soybean rotation as affected by fall and spring application of nitrogen and nitrapyrin. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34(2): 590–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren L T, Liu Z X, Wei T Y, et al. 2012. Evaluation of energy input and output of sweet sorghum grown as a bioenergy crop on coastal saline-alkali land. Energy, 47(1): 166–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimidis A, Dierickx W. 2003. Evaluation of subsurface drainage performance in Lithuania. Agricultural Water Management, 59(1): 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzema H P, Nijland H J, Croon F W. 2006. Subsurface drainage practices: From manual installation to large-scale implementation. Agricultural Water Management, 86(1–2): 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruisen Z, Dong X G, Ma Y.2009. Sustainable water saving: new concept of modern agricultural water saving, starting from development of Xinjiang’s agricultural irrigation over the last 50 years. Irrigation and Drainage, 58(4): 383–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sallam G A H. 2017. The assessment of Egypt’s subsurface drainage system. In: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savci S. 2012. An agricultural pollutant: chemical fertilizer. International Journal of Environmental Science & Development, 3(1): 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song X J, Kuroha T, Ayano M, et al. 2015. Rare allele of a previously unidentified histone H4 acetyltransferase enhances grain weight, yield, and plant biomass in rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(1): 76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuyt L C P M, Dierickx W, Beltrán J M. 2000. Materials for Subsurface Land Drainage Systems. Rome: FAO, 3–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma S, Cooke R. 2015. Performance of drainage water management systems in Illinois, United States. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 67(6): 453–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z H, Heng T, Li W H, et al. 2017. Effects of drainage pipe drainage on soil salinity leaching under drip irrigation. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 48: 253–261. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Willer H, Lernoud J. 2016. The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2016 (17th ed.). Frick and Bonn: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL and IFOAM Organics International, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie T, Liu X, Sun T. 2011. The effects of groundwater table and flood irrigation strategies on soil water and salt dynamics and reed water use in the Yellow River Delta, China. Ecological Modelling, 222(2): 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Wang B S. 2014. Progress in techniques of improvement and utilization of saline-alkali land in China and its future trend. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2: 1–11. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao R J, Yang J S, Liu G M. 2006. Characteristics and agro-biological management of saline-alkalized land in Northeast China. Soils, 38(3): 256–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J L, Wen T, Wang P S, et al. 2014. Studies on salt-leaching of soil in the region between subsurface drains. Soil and Water Conservation, 28: 242–246. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Li C J, Li Z S, et al. 2013. Characteristics of mineral elements in shoots of three annual halophytes in a saline desert, Northern Xinjiang. Journal of Arid Land, 5(2): 244–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H L, Lai H X, Feng C Z, et al. 2008. Nutrient contents and actinomycetes populations of desert saline-alkali soil in parts regions of Xinjiang. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 17(1): 161–166. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X T, Mi X H, Wang Y P. 2010. Comparative study on the two testing methods of soil total salt. Gansu Agricultural Science & Technology, (4): 14–16. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51741908). We wish to thank BIAN Qingyong, ZHU Yankan, GU Zhenda, WU Qiang, MA Xihe and HOU Yusheng for their help with analysis of soil samples. Thanks are also to WANG Fengjiao and ZHAO Di for soil sampling.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenhua Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heng, T., Liao, R., Wang, Z. et al. Effects of combined drip irrigation and sub-surface pipe drainage on water and salt transport of saline-alkali soil in Xinjiang, China. J. Arid Land 10, 932–945 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-018-0061-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-018-0061-7

Keywords

Navigation