Carbon storage in a wolfberry plantation chronosequence established on a secondary saline land in an arid irrigated area of Gansu Province, China

  • Quanlin Ma
  • Yaolin Wang
  • Yinke Li
  • Tao Sun
  • Eleanor Milne
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Carbon (C) storage has received significant attention for its relevance to agricultural security and climate change. Afforestation can increase C storage in terrestrial ecosystems, and has been recognized as an important measure to offset CO2 emissions. In order to analyze the C benefits of planting wolfberry (Lycium barbarum L.) on the secondary saline lands in arid areas, we conducted a case study on the dynamics of biomass carbon (BC) storage and soil organic carbon (SOC) storage in different-aged wolfberry plantations (4-, 7- and 11-year-old) established on a secondary saline land as well as on the influence of wolfberry plantations on C storage in the plant-soil system in an arid irrigated area (Jingtai County) of Gansu Province, China. The C sequestration and its potential in the wolfberry plantations of Gansu Province were also evaluated. An intact secondary saline land was selected as control. Results show that wolfberry planting could decrease soil salinity, and increase BC, SOC and litter C storage of the secondary saline land significantly, especially in the first 4 years after planting. The aboveground and belowground BC storage values in the intact secondary saline land (control) accounted for only 1.0% and 1.2% of those in the wolfberry plantations, respectively. Compared to the intact secondary saline land, the SOC storage values in the 4-, 7- and 11-year-old wolfberry plantations increased by 36.4%, 37.3% and 43.3%, respectively, and the SOC storage in the wolfberry plantations occupied more than 92% of the ecosystem C storage. The average BC and SOC sequestration rates of the wolfberry plantations for the age group of 0–11 years were 0.73 and 3.30 Mg C/(hm2•a), respectively. There were no significant differences in BC and SOC storage between the 7-year-old and 11-year-old wolfberry plantations, which may be due in part to the large amounts of C offtakes in new branches and fruits. In Gansu Province, the C storage in the wolfberry plantations has reached up to 3.574 Tg in 2013, and the C sequestration potential of the existing wolfberry plantations was 0.134 Tg C/a. These results indicate that wolfberry planting is an ideal agricultural model to restore the degraded saline lands and increase the C sequestration capacity of agricultural lands in arid areas.

Keywords

Lycium barbaum biomass carbon soil organic carbon carbon sequestration potential secondary saline land wolfberry plantation carbon dynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31660232, 41061030), the Carbon Benefits Project (G-4280-3), the Global Environmental Facility (GEF) Co-financed Project, the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of Gansu Province (145RJIA335) and the National Science and Technology Program for People’s Livelihood (2013GS620202). We gratefully acknowledge the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Alexeyev V, Birdsey R, Stakanov V. 1995. Carbon in vegetation of Russian forests: methods to estimate storage and geographical distribution. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 82(1–2): 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amagase H, Farnsworth N R. 2011. A review of botanical characteristics, phytochemistry, clinical relevance in efficacy and safety of Lycium barbarum fruit (Goji). Food Research International, 44(7): 1702–1717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bach M, Freibauer A, Siebner C, et al. 2011. The German Agricultural Soil Inventory: sampling design for a representative assessment of soil organic carbon stocks. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 7: 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bao S D. 2000. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis (3rd ed.). Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press, 14–35. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Batjes N H. 2006. Soil carbon stocks of Jordan and projected changes upon improved management of croplands. Geoderma, 132(3–4): 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonan G B. 2008. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science, 320(5882): 1444–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang R C C, So K F. 2008. Use of anti-aging herbal medicine, Lycium barbarum, against aging-associated diseases. What do we know so far? Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 28(5): 643–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chastain R A Jr, Currie W S, Townsend P A. 2006. Carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling implications of the evergreen understory layer in Appalachian forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 231(1–3): 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chinese Soil Taxonomy Research Group, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Cooperative Research Group on Chinese Soil Taxonomy. 2001. Keys to Chinese Soil Taxonomy (3rd ed.). Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 1–275. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Chivenge P, Vanlauwe B, Gentile R, et al. 2011. Organic resource quality influences short-term aggregate dynamics and soil organic carbon and nitrogen accumulation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43(3): 657–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dai M H, Zhai W D, Lu Z M, et al. 2004. Regional studies of carbon cycles in China: progress and perspectives. Advance in Earth Sciences, 19(1): 120–130. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Davidson E A, Janssens I A. 2006. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 440(7081): 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dou L, Zhang M Q, Liu Q. 2006. The analysis of water environment changes over the past 30 years in the irrigation area of Jingtai. Gansu Science and Technology, 22(6): 4–6. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Eswaran H, Van Den Berg E, Reich P. 1993. Organic carbon in soils of the world. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57(1): 192–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fang J Y, Chen A P. 2001. Dynamic forest biomass carbon pools in China and their significance. Acta Botanica Sinica, 43(9): 967–973. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Gansu Ecological Monitoring and Supervision Administration Bureau. 2016. Monitoring report on the fifth desertification and sandification in Gansu Province. Lanzhou: Gansu Provincial Forestry Department. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Gansu Provincial Forestry Science and Technology Extension Station. 2013. Database on fruit industry development of Gansu Province. Lanzhou: Gansu Provincial Forestry Department. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Ghassemi F, Jakeman A J, Nix H A. 1995. Salinisation of Land and Water Resources: Human Causes, Extent, Management and Case Studies. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 526.Google Scholar
  19. Guan J H, Du S, Cheng J M, et al. 2016. Current stocks and rate of sequestration of forest carbon in Gansu province, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 40(4): 304–317. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guo L B, Gifford R M. 2002. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Global Change Biology, 8(4): 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guo M C, Shi T Y, Duan Y H, et al. 2015. Investigation of amino acids in wolfberry fruit (Lycium barbarum) by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography with precolumn derivatization. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 42: 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Houghton R A. 2007. Balancing the global carbon budget. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 35: 313–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hughes R F, Kauffman J B, Cummings D L. 2002. Dynamics of aboveground and soil carbon and nitrogen stocks and cycling of available nitrogen along a land-use gradient in Rondônia, Brazil. Ecosystems, 5(3): 244–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaramillo V J, Kauffman J B, Rentería-Rodríguez L, et al. 2003. Biomass, carbon, and nitrogen pools in Mexican tropical dry forest landscapes. Ecosystems, 6(7): 609–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. John B, Yamashita T, Ludwig B, et al. 2005. Storage of organic carbon in aggregate and density fractions of silty soils under different types of land use. Geoderma, 128(1–2): 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jose S. 2009. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agroforestry Systems, 76(1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karl T R, Trenberth K E. 2003. Modern global climate change. Science, 302(5651): 1719–1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar B M, Nair P K R. 2011. Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems: Opportunities and Challenges. Netherlands: Springer, 44–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumar S, Lal R, Liu D S, et al. 2013. Estimating the spatial distribution of organic carbon density for the soils of Ohio, USA. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 23(2): 280–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laclau P. 2003. Biomass and carbon sequestration of ponderosa pine plantations and native cypress forests in northwest Patagonia. Forest Ecology and Management, 180(1–3): 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lal R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304(5677): 1623–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lal R. 2006. Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of the soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands. Land Degradation & Development, 17(2): 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lal R. 2008. Soil carbon stocks under present and future climate with specific reference to European ecoregions. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 81(2): 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lei J, Zhang F H, Lin H R, et al. 2017. Soil carbon and nitrogen storage of different reclamation years in salinized wasteland in arid region. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 35(3): 266–271. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  35. Li J G, Pu L J, Han M F, et al. 2014. Soil salinization research in China: advances and prospects. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24(5): 943–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li X G. 2000. The characteristics of soil aggregate in Jingtai electric-irrigating area of Gansu. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 37(2): 263–270. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. Li Y Q, Zhao X Y, Zhang F X, et al. 2015. Accumulation of soil organic carbon during natural restoration of desertified grassland in China’s Horqin Sandy Land. Journal of Arid Land, 7(3): 328–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li Z, Zhang C X, Li M, et al. 2010. Review of characteristics of carbon circle in orchard ecosystem. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, (6): 28–31. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  39. Liang Y X. 2016. Harm of secondary salinization land and control measures in Jingdian high-lift irrigation district. China Water Resources, (7): 55–57. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  40. Liu R, Jin H J, Ma Q L, et al. 2012. Biomass allocation characteristics of different-aged Lycium barbarum in Jintai electrical irrigation area, Gansu province of Northwest China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 31(10): 2493–2500. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  41. Liu W W, Wang X K, Lu F, et al. 2016. Influence of afforestation, reforestation, forest logging, climate change, CO2 concentration rise, fire, and insects on the carbon sequestration capacity of the forest ecosystem. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(8): 2113–2122. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  42. Lu H L, Liu S L, Su Y L, et al. 2012. Chemical Constituents of Fruits of Lycium barbarum L. Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, 28(6): 475–476, 498. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  43. Lu M, Zhou X H, Luo Y Q, et al. 2011. Minor stimulation of soil carbon storage by nitrogen addition: a meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 140(1–2): 234–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ma Q L, Wang Y L, Sun T, et al. 2017. Allocation, accumulation, and output characteristics of nutrient elements of Lycium barbarum grown on secondary saline land. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(18): 6111–6119. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  45. Niu X Z, Duiker S W. 2006. Carbon sequestration potential by afforestation of marginal agricultural land in the Midwestern U.S. Forest Ecology and Management, 223(1–3): 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pan G X, Zhou P, Li Z P, et al. 2009. Combined inorganic/organic fertilization enhances N efficiency and increases rice productivity through organic carbon accumulation in a rice paddy from the Tai Lake region, China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 131(3–4): 274–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Paul K I, Polglase P J, Nyakuengama J G, et al. 2002. Change in soil carbon following afforestation. Forest Ecology and Management, 168(1–3): 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Paustian K, Six J, Elliott E T, et al. 2000. Management options for reducing CO2 emissions from agricultural soils. Biogeochemistry, 48(1): 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Potterat O. 2010. Goji (Lycium barbarum and L. chinense): phytochemistry, pharmacology and safety in the perspective of traditional uses and recent popularity. Planta Medica, 76(1): 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Qi S Z, Xiao H L, Luo F. 2003. Soil taxonomy in mountainous areas in the Hexi region of Gansu province. Journal of Mountain Science, 21(6): 763–774. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  51. Rafique R, Anex R, Hennessy D, et al. 2012. What are the impacts of grazing and cutting events on the N2O dynamics in humid temperate grassland? Geoderma, 181–182: 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schneider S H. 1990. The global warming debate heats up: an analysis and perspective. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 71(9): 1292–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sedjo R, Sohngen B. 2012. Carbon sequestration in forests and soils. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 4: 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shi J, Liu J Y, Gao Z Q, et al. 2004. Research advances of the influence of afforestation on terrestrial carbon sink. Progress in Geography, 23(2): 58–67. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  55. Shrestha B M, Williams S, Easter M, et al. 2009. Modeling soil organic carbon stocks and changes in a Nepalese watershed. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 132(1–2): 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Silver W L, Ostertag R, Lugo A E. 2000. The potential for carbon sequestration through reforestation of abandoned tropical agricultural and pasture lands. Restoration Ecology, 8(4): 394–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith P, Powlson D, Glendining M, et al. 1997. Potential for carbon sequestration in European soils: preliminary estimates for five scenarios using results from long-term experiments. Global Change Biology, 3(1): 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sofo A, Nuzzo V, Palese A M, et al. 2005. Net CO2 storage in Mediterranean olive and peach orchards. Scientia Horticulturae, 107(1): 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spohn M, Giani L. 2011. Total, hot water extractable, and oxidation-resistant carbon in sandy hydromorphic soils-analysis of a 220-year chronosequence. Plant and Soil, 338(1–2): 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sun T, Wang Y L, Ma Q L, et al. 2013. Economical benefit of wolfberry field in secondary salinization land of Jingtai electrical-irrigation area. Pratacultural Science, 30(9): 1454–1461. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  61. Tremblay S, Périé C, Ouimet R. 2006. Changes in organic carbon storage in a 50 year white spruce plantation chronosequence established on fallow land in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36(11): 2713–2723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vesterdal L, Ritter E, Gundersen P. 2002. Change in soil organic carbon following afforestation of former arable land. Forest Ecology and Management, 169(1–2): 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang J L, Huang X J, Zhong T Y, et al. 2011. Review on sustainable utilization of salt-affected land. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(5): 673–684.Google Scholar
  64. Wang X J, Zhang J H. 2012. Investigation and research on salinization arable land in Jingtai County, Gansu province. Gansu Science and Technology, 28(23): 147–148, 162. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  65. Wang X K, Liu W W, Lu F. 2015. 166 Questions & Answers Carbon Sequestration in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Beijing: Science Press, 9–15. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  66. Wang Y L, Zhao C Y, Ma Q L, et al. 2015. Carbon benefits of wolfberry plantation on secondary saline land in Jingtai oasis, Gansu—a case study on application of the CBP model. Journal of Environmental Management, 157: 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wei Y Q, Xu X, Wang P. 2005. Physiological responses of Lycium barbarum L. under soil salt stress. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 21(9): 213–217. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  68. Wellock M L, LaPerle C M, Kiely G. 2011. What is the impact of afforestation on the carbon stocks of Irish mineral soils? Forest Ecology and Management, 262(8): 1589–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yang R F, Hu W C, Li Z G. 2012. Preliminary research on carbon sequestration potential of Ningxia wolfberry (Lycium barbarum). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33(1): 49–52. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  70. Yue M, Chang Q R, Wang F, et al. 2008. Research progress in soil organic carbon storage. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 39(5): 1173–1178. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  71. Zhang M Q, Zeng Z Z. 1989. The basic features of the subterranean and the hydrogeologic problems in the arid irrigation areas. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 3(2): 83–89. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  72. Zhang Y F, Lin H M, Xiao W, et al. 2006. Salty ion distributions in different organs of Lycium barbarum L. at different ages under salt stress. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 26(1): 68–72. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  73. Zhao J H, Li H X, Xi W P, et al. 2015. Changes in sugars and organic acids in wolfberry (Lycium barbarum L.) fruit during development and maturation. Food Chemistry, 173: 718–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zheng J F, Cheng K, Pan G X, et al. 2011. Perspectives on studies on soil carbon stocks and the carbon sequestration potential of China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 56(35): 3748–3758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhou L P, Hu X K, Chen F, et al. 2011. Study on landscape pattern influenced by land use change in Jingtai irrigation area. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 31(1): 45–48. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Quanlin Ma
    • 1
  • Yaolin Wang
    • 1
  • Yinke Li
    • 1
  • Tao Sun
    • 1
  • Eleanor Milne
    • 2
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Desertification and Aeolian Sand Disaster CombatingGansu Desert Control Research InstituteLanzhouChina
  2. 2.Natural Resource Ecology LaboratoryColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations