-
1.
In order to counter the defence of invalidity raised by the defendant in infringement proceedings, the patent owner is entitled to propose a correction/limitation of the patent until the last oral hearing before the fact-finding court even if for legal reasons he is barred from proposing this limitation/correction in invalidation or correction proceedings before the Japanese Patent Office.
-
2.
Raising the counter-defence of correction/limitation only later (here: at the stage of final appeal) allows the court to disregard the counter-defence as late-filed even where it is based on actually pending correction proceedings before the Japanese Patent Office (Continuation of Supreme Court, 24 April 2008 – “Knife Processing Device”).
Notes
Translated in IIC 40(6):721–727 (2009) – “Knife Processing Device” w. comment by Christopher Heath.
Author information
Consortia
Additional information
Translated from the original by Atsuhiro Furuta, former Guest Researcher of Max Plank Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich, Germany.
For a case note on this decision by Atsuhiro Furuta, see this issue of IIC at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-018-0672-8.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patent Act, Secs. 104ter, 104quater. “Sheet Cutter”. IIC 49, 237–240 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-018-0668-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-018-0668-4