The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 217–226 | Cite as

Assessing Taiwanese College Students’ Intercultural Sensitivity, EFL Interests, Attitudes Toward Native English Speakers, Ethnocentrism, and Their Interrelation

  • Ya-Chen Su
Regular Article


The development of travel opportunities and technology in the 21st century has brought people from different cultures and countries more opportunities to closely interact. The purposes of the study are to assess the degree of Taiwanese college students’ intercultural sensitivities, ethnocentrism, and attitudes toward native English speakers (NES) and English-as-a-foreign language (EF) interests. This study also examines the interrelationships between intercultural sensitivities and a range of variables (learners’ ethnocentrism, EFL interests, and attitudes toward NES) and the significant predictors affecting the development of intercultural sensitivity. A total of 1191 college students participated in this study. Three instruments, the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (Chen and Starosta in Hum Commun 3:1–15, 2000), the General Ethnocentrism Scale (Neuliep and McCroskey in J Intercult Commun Res 31:201–215, 1997), and the Attitudes and Motivation Test Battery (Gardner et al. 1974, London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario) were modified and used for data collection. Descriptive statistics, t test, correlational analysis, and Multiple Regression were employed for data analysis. Results found that among four dimensions of intercultural sensitivity, the highest correlations are between learners’ interaction engagement and confidence. EFL interests, attitudes toward NES, and ethnocentrism are significantly related with intercultural sensitivity, where each variable is a significant predictor for intercultural sensitivity development.


Intercultural sensitivity Intercultural learning EFL interests Attitudes Ethnocentrism Correlation 


  1. Anderson, P. H., Lawton, L., Rexeisen, R. J., & Hubbard, A. C. (2006). Short-term study abroad and intercultural sensitivity: A pilot study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 467–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50, 311–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateman, B. E. (2002). Promoting openness toward cultural learning: Ethnocentric interviews for students of Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 318–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bateman, B. E. (2004). Achieving affective and behavioral outcomes in cultural learning: The case for ethnographic interviews. Foreign Language Annals, 37(2), 240–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, M. J. (1986). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Cross-cultural orientation: New conceptualizations and applications (pp. 27–69). New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, J. M., & Bennett, M. J. (2004). Developing intercultural sensitivity: An interactive approach to global and domestic diversity. In D. Landis, J. M. Bennett, & M. J. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (pp. 147–165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, J. M., Bennett, M. J., & Allen, W. (2003). Developing intercultural competence in the language classroom. In D. L. Lange & R. M. Paige (Eds.), Culture as the core: Perspectives on culture in second langue learning (pp. 237–269). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Brislin, R. (1992). The measurement of intercultural sensitivity using the concepts of individualism and collectivism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16(4), 413–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byram, M., & Zarate, G. (1997). The sociocultural and intercultural dimension of language learning and teaching. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. J. (1996). Intercultural communication competence: A synthesis. In B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 19 (pp. 353–383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. J. (2000). The development and validation of the international communication sensitivity scale. Human Communication, 3, 1–15.Google Scholar
  12. Clement, R., & Kruidenier, B. (1985). Aptitude, attitude, and motivation in second language proficiency: A test of Clement’s model. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Council of Europe. (1997). The sociocultural and intercultural dimensions of language learning and teaching. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  14. Engle, L., & Engle, J. (2004). Assessing language acquisition and intercultural sensitivity development in relation to study abroad program design. Frontiers, 5, 219–236.Google Scholar
  15. Fritz, W., Mollenberg, A., & Chen, G. M. (2002). Measuring intercultural sensitivity in different cultural contexts. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11, 165–176.Google Scholar
  16. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  17. Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). On the measurement of affective variables in second language learning. Language Learning, 43, 157–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardner, R. C., Masoret, A. M., Tennant, J., & Mihic, L. (2004). Integrative motivation: Changes during a year-long intermediate-level language. Language Learning, 54(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gardner, R. C., Smythe, P. C., & Clement, R. (1974). Attitudes and motivation test battery. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
  20. Gudykunst, W., & Kim, Y. (1997). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication (Vol. 3). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Kim, R. I., & Goldstein, S. B. (2005). Intercultural attitudes predict favorable study abroad expectations of American college students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9, 265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kitsantas, A. (2004). Studying abroad: The role of college students’ goals on the development of cross-cultural skills and global understanding. College Student Journal, 38(3), 441–452.Google Scholar
  23. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  24. Levine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflicts, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Lukens, J. (1978). Ethnocentric speech: Its nature and implications. Ethnic Groups, 2, 35–53.Google Scholar
  26. MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacIntyre, P. D. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mantle-Bromley, C. (1995). Positive attitudes and realistic beliefs: Links to proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 79(3), 372–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCroskey, J. C. (1997). Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived communication competence: Conceptualization and perspectives. In J. A. Daly & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, & communication apprehension (pp. 75–108). Cresskil, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  30. Meyer, M. (1991). Development transcultural competence: Case studies of advanced foreign language learners. In D. Buttjes & M. Byrams (Eds.), Mediating language culture (pp. 136–158). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  31. Ministry of Education. (1999). Nine-year joint curriculum plan. Taipei: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  32. Nault, D. (2006). Going global: Rethinking culture teaching in ELT contexts. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15(3), 264–272.Google Scholar
  33. Neuliep, J. R. (2002). Assessing the reliability and validity of the generalized ethnocentrism scale. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 31, 201–215.Google Scholar
  34. Neuliep, J. W., Chaudoir, M., & McCroskey, J. C. (2001). A cross-cultural comparison of ethnocentrism among Japanese and United States college students. Communication Research Reports, 18(2), 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Neuliep, J. W., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The development of a U.S. and generalized ethnocentrism scale. Communication Research Report, 14, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding the “other side”: Intercultural learning in Spanish–English email exchange. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 118–144.Google Scholar
  37. Oxford, R., & Burry-Stock, J. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning SILL. System, 23, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robinson-Stuart, G., & Nocon, H. (1996). Second cultural acquisition: Ethnography in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 80(4), 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sercu, L. (2002). Autonomous learning and the acquisition of intercultural communicative competence: Some implications for course development. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sercu, L. (2006). The foreign language and intercultural competence teacher: The acquisition of a new professional identity. Intercultural Education, 17(1), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, S. L., Paige, M., & Steglitz, I. (2003). Theoretical foundations of intercultural training and applications to the teaching of culture. In D. L. Lange & R. M. Paige (Eds.), Culture as the core: Perspectives on culture in second langue learning (pp. 89–125). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Tse, L. (2000). Student perceptions of foreign language study: A qualitative analysis of foreign language autobiographies. Modern Language Journal, 84, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wandel, R. (2002). Teaching India in the EFL-classroom: A cultural or intercultural approach. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15(3), 264–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied EnglishSouthern Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTainan CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations