Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reply to “Comment on Effect of High-intensity Interval Training Versus Sprint Interval Training on Time-Trial Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Systematic Review to this article was published on 07 February 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rosenblat MA, Perrotta AS, Thomas SG. Effect of high-intensity interval training versus sprint interval training on time-trial performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2020;50(6):1145–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01264-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Conceição LSR, Gomes-Neto M, Carvalho VO. Comment on: "Effect of high-intensity interval training versus sprint interval training on time-trial performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.". Sports Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01352-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gomes Neto M, Duraes AR, Conceicao LSR, Saquetto MB, Ellingsen O, Carvalho VO. High intensity interval training versus moderate intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2018;261:134–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gomes-Neto M, Duraes AR, Reis H, Neves VR, Martinez BP, Carvalho VO. High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24(16):1696–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tucker WJ, Haykowsky MJ, Seo Y, Stehling E, Forman DE. Impaired exercise tolerance in heart failure: role of skeletal muscle morphology and function. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2018;15(6):323–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Poole DC, Richardson RS, Haykowsky MJ, Hirai DM, Musch TI. Exercise limitations in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. J Appl Physiol. 2018;124(1):208–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Díaz-Buschmann I, Jaureguizar KV, Calero MJ, Aquino RS. Programming exercise intensity in patients on beta-blocker treatment: the importance of choosing an appropriate method. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21(12):1474–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wonisch M, Hofmann P, Fruhwald FM, Kraxner W, Hödl R, Pokan R, et al. Influence of beta-blocker use on percentage of target heart rate exercise prescription. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2003;10(4):296–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smart NA, Steele M. A comparison of 16 weeks of continuous vs intermittent exercise training in chronic heart failure patients. Congest Heart Fail. 2012;18(4):205–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nechwatal RM, Duck C, Gruber G. Physical training as interval or continuous training in chronic heart failure for improving functional capacity, hemodynamics and quality of life–a controlled study. Z Kardiol. 2002;91(4):328–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Koufaki P, Mercer TH, George KP, Nolan J. Low-volume high-intensity interval training vs continuous aerobic cycling in patients with chronic heart failure: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial of feasibility and effectiveness. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(4):348–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellingsen O, Halle M, Conraads V, Stoylen A, Dalen H, Delagardelle C, et al. High-intensity interval training in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Circulation. 2017;135(9):839–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Freyssin C, Verkindt C, Prieur F, Benaich P, Maunier S, Blanc P. Cardiac rehabilitation in chronic heart failure: effect of an 8-week, high-intensity interval training versus continuous training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(8):1359–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cochran AJ, Percival ME, Tricarico S, Little JP, Cermak N, Gillen JB, et al. Intermittent and continuous high-intensity exercise training induce similar acute but different chronic muscle adaptations. Exp Physiol. 2014;99(5):782–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. MacInnis MJ, Zacharewicz E, Martin BJ, Haikalis ME, Skelly LE, Tarnopolsky MA, et al. Superior mitochondrial adaptations in human skeletal muscle after interval compared to continuous single-leg cycling matched for total work. J Physiol. 2017;595(9):2955–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vollaard NB, Metcalfe RS, Williams S. Effect of number of sprints in an SIT session on change in VO2max: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(6):1147–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gibala MJ, Little JP, Macdonald MJ, Hawley JA. Physiological adaptations to low-volume, high-intensity interval training in health and disease. J Physiol. 2012;590(5):1077–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. MacInnis MJ, Gibala MJ. Physiological adaptations to interval training and the role of exercise intensity. J Physiol. 2017;595(9):2915–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Exercise Science, Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Michael A. Rosenblat & Scott G. Thomas

  2. Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Faculty of Science, Simon Fraser University, Shrum Science Centre, Office K8634, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada

    Michael A. Rosenblat

  3. Department of Kinesiology, Langara College, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Andrew S. Perrotta

Authors
  1. Michael A. Rosenblat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew S. Perrotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Scott G. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Rosenblat.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Conflict of interest

Michael Rosenblat, Andrew Perrotta and Scott Thomas declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

This comment, reply and the parent article refers to the article available at Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01264-1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosenblat, M.A., Perrotta, A.S. & Thomas, S.G. Reply to “Comment on Effect of High-intensity Interval Training Versus Sprint Interval Training on Time-Trial Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Sports Med 50, 2265–2267 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01353-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01353-1

Search

Navigation