1 Correction to: Sports Medicine https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0947-8
Page 1: Abstract, Conclusions, sentence 4. The following sentence, which read:
Moreover, the intensity (load) is not a determinant of sprint performance improvement, but the recommended volume is > 160 m per session, and approximately 2680 m per week, with a training frequency of two to three times per week, for at least 6 weeks.
should read:
Moreover, the intensity (load) is not a determinant of sprint performance improvement, but the recommended volume is > 160 m per session, and approximately 2680 m per total training program, with a training frequency of two to three times per week, for at least 6 weeks.
Page 6: Section 3.3, paragraph 3, sentence 2. The following sentence, which read:
A large ES was obtained for a frequency over twice a week (ES 1.85) [55], and moderate ESs were found for lower loads (ES 0.61) [39, 55–57, 59–65], > 6-week training periods (ES 0.63) [39, 55, 56, 60, 63–66], session volume > 160 m (ES 0.92) [55, 56, 59, 60, 64], total weekly training volume > 2680 m (ES 0.83) [55, 59, 60, 64], and rigid surface (ES 0.69) [39, 56, 61, 64].
should read:
A large ES was obtained for a frequency over twice a week (ES 1.85) [55], and moderate ESs were found for lower loads (ES 0.61) [39, 55–57, 59–65], > 6-week training periods (ES 0.63) [39, 55, 56, 60, 63–66], session volume > 160 m (ES 0.92) [55, 56, 59, 60, 64], total training volume > 2680 m (ES 0.83) [55, 59, 60, 64], and rigid surface (ES 0.69) [39, 56, 61, 64].
Page 6: Section 3.3, paragraph 3, sentence 3. The following sentence, which read:
Small ESs were also found for a training frequency equal to or fewer than two trainings per week (ES 0.52) [39, 56, 57, 59–66], a total weekly training volume < 2680 m (ES 0.53) [39, 56, 57, 61–63, 65, 66], and grass surface (ES 0.47) [59, 60, 65, 66].
should read:
Small ESs were also found for a training frequency equal to or fewer than two trainings per week (ES 0.52) [39, 56, 57, 59–66], a total training volume < 2680 m (ES 0.53) [39, 56, 57, 61–63, 65, 66], and grass surface (ES 0.47) [59, 60, 65, 66].
Page 19: Section 4.1, paragraph 7, sentence 1. The following sentence, which read:
Another variable that should be considered when designing training programs with RST is volume, both for each session and for the microcycle.
should read:
Another variable that should be considered when designing training programs with RST is volume, both for each session and for the training cycle (i.e. mesocycle).
Page 19: Section 4.1, paragraph 7, sentence 4. The following sentence, which read:
Similarly, when weekly volumes were compared, higher volumes (> 2680 m) produced a moderate effect (ES 0.83) compared with volumes 720–2680 m (ES 0.53), although the effects were statistically significant for both volume per session and weekly volume.
should read:
Similarly, when total training volumes were compared, higher volumes (> 2680 m) produced a moderate effect (ES 0.83) compared with volumes 720–2680 m (ES 0.53), although the effects were statistically significant for both volume per session and total training volume.
Page 20: Section 4.2, paragraph 2, final sentence. The following sentence, which read:
With respect to the training characteristics, the effect was small in all cases and significant with loads < 20% BM (ES 0.35; p = 0.02), weekly training frequencies of ≤ 2 days (ES 0.35; p = 0.02), for duration > 6 weeks (ES 0.39; p = 0.01), volumes per session > 160 m (ES 0.53; p = 0.03), and weekly values > 2680 m (ES 0.53; p = 0.03).
should read:
With respect to the training characteristics, the effect was small in all cases and significant with loads < 20% BM (ES 0.35; p = 0.02), weekly training frequencies of ≤ 2 days (ES 0.35; p = 0.02), for duration > 6 weeks (ES 0.39; p = 0.01), volumes per session > 160 m (ES 0.53; p = 0.03), and total training values > 2680 m (ES 0.53; p = 0.03).
Page 21: Section 5, paragraph 1, sentence 7. The following sentence, which read:
Finally, with regards to the training characteristics, the intensity (load) is not a determinant of sprint performance improvement, but the recommended volume is > 160 m per session, and approximately 2680 m per week, with a training frequency of 2–3 times per week, for at least 6 weeks.
should read:
Finally, with regards to the training characteristics, the intensity (load) is not a determinant of sprint performance improvement, but the recommended volume is > 160 m per session, and approximately 2680 m per total training program, with a training frequency of 2–3 times per week, for at least 6 weeks.
The original article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alcaraz, P.E., Carlos-Vivas, J., Oponjuru, B.O. et al. Correction to: The Effectiveness of Resisted Sled Training (RST) for Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med 48, 2167–2168 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0957-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0957-6