Exercise Blood Pressure Guidelines: Time to Re-evaluate What is Normal and Exaggerated?
Blood pressure responses to graded exercise testing can provide important diagnostic and prognostic information. While published guidelines outline what constitutes a “normal” and “abnormal” (i.e., exaggerated) blood pressure response to exercise testing, the widespread use of exaggerated blood pressure responses as a clinical tool is limited due to sparse and inconsistent data. A review of the original sources from these guidelines reveals an overall lack of empirical evidence to support both the normal blood pressure responses and their upper limits. In this current opinion, we critically evaluate the current exercise blood pressure guidelines including (1) the normal blood pressure responses to graded exercise testing; (2) the upper limits of this normal response; (3) the blood pressure criteria for test termination; and (4) the thresholds for exaggerated blood pressure responses. We provide evidence that exercise blood pressure responses vary according to subject characteristics, and subsequently a re-evaluation of what constitutes normal and abnormal responses is necessary to strengthen the clinical utility of this assessment.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
K. D. Currie is supported by a Fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MFE-140863). J. S. Floras holds the Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Integrative Cardiovascular Biology.
Conflict of interest
K. D. Currie, J. S. Floras, A. La Gerche, and J. M. Goodman declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s resource manual for guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.Google Scholar
- 5.Naughton J, Haider R. Methods of exercise testing. In: Naughton J, Hellerstein HK, Mohler IC, editors. Exercise testing and exercise training in coronary heart disease. New York: Academic Press; 1973. p. 79.Google Scholar
- 10.Miyai N, Arita M, Morioka I, Miyashita K, Nishio I, Takeda S. Exercise BP response in subjects with high-normal BP: exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise and risk of future hypertension in subjects with high-normal blood pressure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(5):1626–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.Google Scholar
- 46.American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1986.Google Scholar
- 55.American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1991.Google Scholar
- 58.Dahms RW, Giese MD, Nagle F, Corliss RJ. The diagnostic and prognostic value of combined rest-exercise blood pressure patterns. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1978;10:36.Google Scholar
- 59.Jackson AS, Squires W, Grimes G, Bread EF. Prediction of future resting hypertension from exercise blood pressure. J Cardiac Rehab. 1983;3:263–8.Google Scholar
- 60.Zanettini JO, Pisani Zanettini J, Zanettini MT, Fuchs FD. Correction of the hypertensive response in the treadmill testing by the work performance improves the prediction of hypertension by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and incidence of cardiac abnormalities by echocardiography: results of an eight year follow-up study. Int J Cardiol. 2010;141(3):243–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 66.Schwartz JE, Burg MM, Shimbo D, Broderick JE, Stone AA, Ishikawa J, et al. Clinic blood pressure underestimates ambulatory blood pressure in an untreated employer-based US population: results from the masked hypertension study. Circulation. 2016;134(23):1794–807.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar