Sports Medicine

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 1049–1058 | Cite as

Running Performance, \({\rm V}{\rm O}_{\rm {2max}}\), and Running Economy: The Widespread Issue of Endogenous Selection Bias

Review Article

Abstract

Studies in sport and exercise medicine routinely use samples of highly trained individuals in order to understand what characterizes elite endurance performance, such as running economy and maximal oxygen uptake (\({\rm V}{\rm O}_{\mathrm {2max}}\)). However, it is not well understood in the literature that using such samples most certainly leads to biased findings and accordingly potentially erroneous conclusions because of endogenous selection bias. In this paper, I review the current literature on running economy and \({\rm V}{\rm O}_{\mathrm {2max}}\), and discuss the literature in light of endogenous selection bias. I demonstrate that the results in a large part of the literature may be misleading, and provide some practical suggestions as to how future studies may alleviate endogenous selection bias.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Solveig T. Borgen, and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments and suggestions.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Conflict of interest

Nicolai T. Borgen declares that he has no conflict of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Supplementary material

40279_2017_789_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (158 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 158 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Atkinson G, Davidson R, Passfield L, et al. Could the correlation between maximal oxygen uptake and “ECONOMY” be spurious? Med Sports Exerc. 2003;35(7):1242–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkinson G, Davison R, Nevill AM. Response: inverse relationship between \({\rm V}{\rm O}_{\mathrm {2max}}\) and economy in world class cyclists. Med Sports Exerc. 2004;36(6):1085–6.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allison PD. Fixed effects regression models, vol. 160. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publishing; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berkson J. Limitations of the application of fourfold table analysis to hospital data. Biometrics. 1946;2(3):47–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berk RA, Freedman DA. Statistical assumptions as empirical commitments. In: Blomberg TG, Cohen S, editors. Law, punishment, and social control: essays in honor of Sheldon Messinger. 2nd ed. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 2003. p. 235–54.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: part 1—correlation within subjects. BMJ. 1995;310(6977):446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bleakley C, MacAuley D. The quality of research in sports journals. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(2):124–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borgen NT. Fixed effects in unconditional quantile regression. Stata J. 2016;16(2):403–15.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brandon LJ. Physiological factors associated with middle distance running performance. Sports Med. 1995;19(4):268–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elwert F, Winship C. Endogenous selection bias: the problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annu Rev Sociol. 2014;40:31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fay L, Londeree BR, LaFontaine TP, et al. Physiological parameters related to distance running performance in female athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989;21(3):319–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Foster C, Lucia A. Running economy. Sports Med. 2007;37(4–5):316–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Firpo S, Fortin NM, Lemieux T. Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica. 2009;77(3):953–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gelman A, Carlin J. Beyond power calculations: assessing Type S (sign) and Type M (magnitude) errors. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014;9(6):641–51.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grant S, Craig I, Wilson J, et al. The relationship between 3 km running performance and selected physiological variables. J Sports Sci. 1997;15(4):403–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harris JD, Cvetanovich G, Erickson BJ, et al. Current status of evidence-based sports medicine. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(3):362–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000;30(1):1–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Legaz-Arrese AL, Ostáriz ES, Mallen JC, et al. The changes in running performance and maximal oxygen uptake after long-term training in elite athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005;45(4):435.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Legaz-Arrese A, Munguía-Izquierdo D, Nuviala AN, et al. Average \({\rm V}{\rm O}_{\mathrm {2max}}\) as a function of running performances on different distances. Sci Sports. 2007;22(1):43–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lucia A, Hoyos J, Perez M, et al. Inverse relationship between \({\rm V}{\rm O}_{\mathrm {2max}}\) and economy/efficiency in world-class cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(12):2079–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lucia A, Hoyos J, Perez M, et al. Could the correlation between maximal oxygen uptake and “ECONOMY” be spurious? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(7):1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jones A. The physiology of the world record holder for the women’s marathon. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2006;1(2):101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Joyner MJ. Modeling: optimal marathon performance on the basis of physiological factors. J Appl Physiol. 1991;70(2):683–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Joyner MJ, Ruiz JR, Lucia A. The two-hour marathon: who and when? J Appl Physiol. 2011;110(1):275–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Joyner MJ, Coyle EF. Endurance exercise performance: the physiology of champions. J Physiol. 2008;586(1):35–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maughan RJ, Leiper JB. Aerobic capacity and fractional utilisation of aerobic capacity in elite and non-elite male and female marathon runners. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1983;52(1):80–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marcora SM, Staiano W, Manning V. Mental fatigue impairs physical performance in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106(3):857–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mooses M, Mooses K, Haile DW, et al. Dissociation between running economy and running performance in elite Kenyan distance runners. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(2):136–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morgan DW, Baldini FD, Martin PE, et al. Ten kilometer performance and predicted velocity at \({\rm V}{\rm O}_{\mathrm {2max}}\) among well-trained male runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989;21(1):78–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Morgan DW, Daniels JT. Relationship between \({\rm V}{\rm O}_{\mathrm {2max}}\) and the aerobic demand of running in elite distance runners. Int J Sports Med. 1994;15(07):426–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Morgan DW, Pate R. Could the correlation between maximal oxygen uptake and economy be spurious? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(2):345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McLaughlin JE, Howley ET, Bassett DR Jr, et al. Test of the classic model for predicting endurance running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(5):991–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Morgan SL, Winship C. Counterfactuals and causal inference: methods and principles for social research. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Midgley AW, McNaughton LR, Wilkinson M. Is there an optimal training intensity for enhancing the maximal oxygen uptake of distance runners? Sports Med. 2006;36(2):117–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Noakes TD, Myburgh KH, Schall R. Peak treadmill running velocity during the \({\rm V}{\rm O}_{\mathrm {2max}}\) test predicts running performance. J Sports Sci. 1990;8(1):35–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Noakes TD. The central governor model of exercise regulation applied to the marathon. Sports Med. 2007;37(4):374–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ogueta-Alday A, Rodríguez-Marroyo JO, García-López J. Rearfoot striking runners are more economical than midfoot strikers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(3):580–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pate RR, Macera CA, Bailey SP, et al. Physiological, anthropometric, and training correlates of running economy. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24(10):1128–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Paavolainen L, Häkkinen K, Hämäläinen I, et al. Explosive-strength training improves 5-km running time by improving running economy and muscle power. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86(5):1527–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pearl J. Causality: models, reasoning, and inference. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pearl J. Linear models: a useful “microscope” for causal analysis. J Causal Inference. 2013;1(1):155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pitsiladis Y, Wang G, Wolfarth B, et al. Genomics of elite sporting performance: what little we know and necessary advances. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(9):550–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pollock ML. Submaximal and maximal working capacity of elite distance runners. Part I: cardiorespiratory aspects. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1977;301(1):310–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ramsbottom R, Williams C, Fleming N, et al. Training induced physiological and metabolic changes associated with improvements in running performance. Br J Sports Med. 1989;23(3):171–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Case-control studies. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2008. p. 111–27.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Saltin B, Larsen H, Terrados N, et al. Aerobic exercise capacity at sea level and at altitude in Kenyan boys, junior and senior runners compared with Scandinavian runners. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1995;5(4):209–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Saunders PU, Pyne DB, Telford RD, et al. Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners. Sports Med. 2004;34(7):465–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Saunders PU, Pyne DB, Telford RD, et al. Reliability and variability of running economy in elite distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(11):1972–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Smoliga JM. What is running economy? A clinician’s guide to key concepts, applications and myths. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(10):831–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tartaruga MP, Brisswalter J, Peyré-Tartaruga LA, et al. The relationship between running economy and biomechanical variables in distance runners. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2012;83(3):367–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shaw AJ, Ingham SA, Atkinson G, et al. The correlation between running economy and maximal oxygen uptake: cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships in highly trained distance runners. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0123101.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Vollaard NB, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Fredriksson K, et al. Systematic analysis of adaptations in aerobic capacity and submaximal energy metabolism provides a unique insight into determinants of human aerobic performance. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106(5):1479–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–9.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Winship C, Mare RD. Models for sample selection bias. Annu Rev Sociol. 1992;18:327–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wang CY, Haskell WL, Farrell SW, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness levels among US adults 20–49 years of age: findings from the 1999–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171(4):426–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wilber RL, Pitsiladis YP. Kenyan and Ethiopian distance runners: what makes them so good? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2012;7(2):92–102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Human GeographyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations