Skip to main content
Log in

Impacto del tratamiento biológico en la hospitalización y en el coste de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal

  • Artículo de Investigación Original
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Spanish Research Articles

Resumen

Objetivos

Valorar el impacto del tratamiento anti-TNF\(\upalpha\) en hospitalizaciones y cirugías por enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII).

Métodos

Estudio retrospectivo que compara los ingresos hospitalarios por EII antes y tras el uso de anti-TNF\(\upalpha \), usando como marco de referencia las hospitalizaciones totales del centro y las debidas a enfermedades digestivas.

Resultados

Antes de disponer de los fármacos anti-TNF\(\upalpha \) (periodo 1994–2000) los ingresos médicos por EII supusieron el 0,55% del total de los ingresos hospitalarios y el 5,36% de los debidos a patología digestiva. Una vez disponibles los anti-TNF\(\upalpha \) (entre 2001–2010) las hospitalizaciones por EII se redujeron al 0,47% y 3,82% respectivamente, es decir, un 14,54% menos de ingresos médicos por EII respecto de los totales hospitalarios. Con relación a los debidos a patologías digestivas en su conjunto, los ingresos médicos y quirúrgicos por EII se redujeron un 28,73% y un 39,34% respectivamente. La probabilidad de que se produjeran menos ingresos médicos por EII al disponer de anti-TNF\(\upalpha \) fue del 45% (OR 1,45; IC 95%: 1,26–1,67; \(p < 0{,}001\)) y del 67% para cirugías en pacientes con EII (OR: 1,67; IC 95%: 1,10–2,54; \(p = 0{,}021\)). En nuestro centro estas cifras suponían una reducción de 15,3 ingresos médicos/año y 2,21 cirugías/año por EII.

Conclusiones

La disponibilidad de los fármacos anti-TNF\(\upalpha \) reduce significativamente los ingresos médicos y quirúrgicos en pacientes con EII.

Abstract

Aim

To valorate the impact of anti-TNF\(\upalpha\) therapy on hospitalizations and surgeries in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Methods

Retrospective study comparing hospital admissions for IBD before and after the use of anti-TNF\(\upalpha\) therapy, using as a frame of reference the total hospitalizations of the center and those due to digestive diseases.

Results

Before anti-TNF\(\upalpha\) became available (years 1994 to 2000) medical IBD admissions accounted 0.55% of total hospital admissions and 5.36% of those due to digestive diseases, while from 2001 to 2010 these rates were 0.47% and 3.82% respectively. Once anti-TNF\(\upalpha\) were in use (years 2001 to 2010) hospitalizations for IBD were reduced to 0.47% and 3.82% respectively, equivalent to 14.54% fewer medical admissions for IBD with respect to total hospital admissions. In relation to those due to digestive diseases, medical and surgical admissions for IBD were reduced by 28.73% and 39.34% respectively. Likelihood of reducing medical admissions due to IBD when anti-TNF\(\upalpha\) were available was 45% (OR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.26–1.67; \(p<0.001\)) and 67% when IBD surgical admissions were considered (OR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.10–2.54; \(p=0.021\)). In our hospital, these figures implied a reduction of 15.3 medical admissions/year and 2.21 surgeries/year due to IBD.

Conclusions

The availability of anti-TNF\(\upalpha\) drugs significantly reduced medical and surgical admissions in patients with IBD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figura 1
Figura 2

Bibliografía

  1. Ondategui-Parra S. Informe sobre la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal: situación actual y retos asistenciales en los últimos años. EY 2016. Disponible en: http://www.ey.com/es/es/home/ey-informe-sobre-la-enfermedad-inflamatoria-intestinal

  2. Binder V. Prognosis and quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. vol. 10. 1988. p. 172–174. Int Disabil Stud.

  3. Binder V, Hendriksen C, Kreiner S. Prognosis in Crohn’s disease: based on results from a regional patient group from the county of Copenhagen. Gut. 1985;26:146–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ekbom A, Helmick CG, Zack M, et al. Survival and causes of death in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:954–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Silverstein MD, Loftus EV, Sandborn WJ, et al. Clinical course and costs of care for Crohn’s disease: Markov model analysis of a population-based cohort. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:49–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferguson A, Sedgwick DM. Juvenile-onset inflammatory bowel disease: predictors of morbidity and health status in early adult life. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994;28:220–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sonnenberg A. Disability from inflammatory bowel disease among employees in West Germany. Gut. 1989;30:367–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Van der Valk ME, Mangen MJ, Leenders M, et al. Healthcare costs of inflammatory bowel disease have shifted from hospitalization and surgery towards anti-TNF-\(\upalpha \) therapy: results from the COIN study. Gut. 2014;63(1):72–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Libro Blanco sobre costes sociales y económicos de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal 2004. Bloque IV: estimación de costes directos en pacientes ambulatorios con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal en el año. 2004. pp. 145–151.

  10. Pascual-Torres D, Brú-Budesca X. Costes de la endoscopia digestiva en un hospital Universitario de nivel II. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;26(5):279–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Casellas F, Panés J, García-Sánchez V, et al. Costes médicos directos de la enfermedad de Crohn en España. Pharmacoecon Span Res Artic. 2010;7(1):38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bassi A, Dodd S, Williamson P, Bodger K. Cost of illness of inflammatory bowel disease in the UK: a single centre retrospective study. Gut. 2004;53:1471–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Domenech E, García-Planella E ZY, et al. Clinical outcome of newly diagnosed Crohn´s disease: comparative, retrospective study before and after infliximab availabiliy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:233–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hay AR, Hay JW. Inflammator y bowel disease: medical cost algorithms. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;14:318–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Feagan BG, Vreeland MG, Larson LR, et al. Annual cost of care for Crohn’s disease: a payor perspective. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1955–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen RD, Larson LR, Roth JR, et al. The cost of hospitalizations in Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:524–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubenstein JH, Chong RY, Cohen RD. Infliximab decreases resource use among patients with Crohn’s disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;35:151–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harrison J, Rubenstein J, Leff A, et al. A controlled trial of the impact of infliximab upon health care utilization, costs, and charges in patients with Crohn’s disease [abstract]. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:A521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jewell D, Satsangi J, Lobo A, et al. Infliximab use in Crohn’s disease: impact on health care resources in the UK. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;17:1047–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lichtenstein GR, Yan S, Bala M, et al. Remission in patients with Crohn’s disease is associated with improvement in employment and quality of life and a decrease in hospitalizations and surgeries. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:91–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sands BE, Anderson FH, Bernstein CN, et al. Infliximab maintenance therapy for fistulizing Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:876–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lichtenstein GR, Yan S, Bala M, et al. Infliximab maintenance treatment reduces hospitalizations, surgeries, and procedures in fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:862–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hay JW, Hay AR. Inflammatory bowel disease: costs-of-illness. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;14:309–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. You AP, Cabanilla LA, Wu EQ, et al. The costs of Crohn’s disease in the United States and other Western countries: a systematic review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:319–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cohen RD, Waters HC, Tang B, Rahman MI. Effects of fistula on healthcare costs and utilization for patients with Crohn’s disease treated in a managed care environment. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:1707–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Blomqvist P, Ekbom A. Inflammatory bowel diseases: health care and costs in Sweden in 1994. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:1134–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. J. Fernández-Pérez.

Ethics declarations

Conflicto de intereses

Los autores declaran no tener ningún conflicto de intereses.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernández-Pérez, F.J., Moreno-García, A.M., Hinojosa-Guadix, J. et al. Impacto del tratamiento biológico en la hospitalización y en el coste de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. PharmacoEcon Span Res Artic 14, 93–99 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40277-018-0075-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40277-018-0075-8

Palabras clave

Keywords

Navigation