Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Support Tools for Preference-Sensitive Decisions in Healthcare: Where Are We? Where Do We Go? How Do We Get There?

  • Commentary
  • Published:
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Picker Institute. Patient-centered care: the road ahead. Picker Institute; 2013. http://ipfcc.org/resources/Patient-Centered-Care-The-Road-Ahead.pdf. Accessed 21 Jun 2019.

  2. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. In: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2001.

  3. Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ. 2010;341:c5146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Friesen-Storms JH, Bours GJ, van der Weijden T, Beurskens AJ. Shared decision making in chronic care in the context of evidence based practice in nursing. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(1):393–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wennberg JE. Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres. BMJ. 2002;325(7370):961–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Rollnick S. Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions. Implement Sci. 2009;4:75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Légaré F, Moumjid-Ferdjaoui N, Drolet R, et al. Core competencies for shared decision making training programs: insights from an international, interdisciplinary working group. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013;33(4):267–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Légaré F, Witteman HO. Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):276–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frampton S, Guastello S, Brady C, et al. Patient-centered care improvement guide. Derby: Planetree; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. PCORI. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. 2019. https://www.pcori.org/about-us. Accessed 26 June 2019.

  11. National Institutes of Health. All of Us Research Program. 2019. https://allofus.nih.gov/. Accessed 26 June 2019.

  12. Craig B, Lancsar E, Mühlbacher A, Brown D, Ostermann J. Health preference research: an overview. The Patient. 2017;. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0253-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, AcademyHealth. Moving patient-centered care forward: how do we get there? 2018. https://www.academyhealth.org/sites/default/files/movingpatientcenteredcareforward_october2018.pdf. Accessed 21 Jun 2019.

  14. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, Flynn TN, Yoo HI, Magidson J, Oppe M. Key issues and potential solutions for understanding healthcare preference heterogeneity free from patient-level scale confounds. Patient. 2018;11(5):463–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzalez JM, Johnson FR, Levitan B, Noel R, Peay H. Symposium title: preference evidence for regulatory decisions. Patient. 2018;11(5):467–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Norman R, Craig BM, Hansen P, et al. Issues in the design of discrete choice experiments. Patient. 2019;12(3):281–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bansback N, Trenaman L, MacDonald KV, et al. An individualized patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) based patient decision aid and surgeon report for patients considering total knee arthroplasty: protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Wait times for priority procedures in Canada. 2019. https://www.cihi.ca/en/wait-times-for-priority-procedures-in-canada. Accessed 26 June 2019.

  20. Hawker G, Bohm ER, Conner-Spady B, et al. Perspectives of Canadian stakeholders on criteria for appropriateness for total joint arthroplasty in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(7):1806–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Marshall D, Faris P, Jones A, et al. Relationship between appropriateness and arthroplasty recommendation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;34(S1):58–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Adekpedjou R, Stacey D, Briere N, et al. Engaging caregivers in health-related housing decisions for older adults with cognitive impairment: a cluster randomized trial. Gerontologist. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz045 (Epub 2019 May 16).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Adekpedjou R, Stacey D, Briere N, et al. “Please listen to me”: a cross-sectional study of experiences of seniors and their caregivers making housing decisions. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0202975.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Haesebaert J, Adekpedjou R, Croteau J, Robitaille H, Legare F. Shared decision-making experienced by Canadians facing health care decisions: a web-based survey. CMAJ Open. 2019;7(2):E210–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Fagerlin A, Pignone M, Abhyankar P, et al. Clarifying values: an updated review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13(Suppl 2):S8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Yelverton V, Ostermann J, Hobbie A, Madut D, Thielman N. A mixed methods approach to understanding antiretroviral treatment preferences: what do patients really want? AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018;32(9):340–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):731–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Preference Collaborative Review Group. Patients’ preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;337:a1864.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Legare F, Adekpedjou R, Stacey D, et al. Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7:CD006732.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Durand MA, Moulton B, Cockle E, Mann M, Elwyn G. Can shared decision-making reduce medical malpractice litigation? A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Cancer progress timeline. 2019. https://www.asco.org/research-progress/cancer-progress-timeline. Accessed 26 June 2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Services Policy & Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

    Jan Ostermann

  2. George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

    Derek S. Brown

  3. Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences (BMS), Health Technology & Services Research (HTSR), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Janine A. van Til

  4. Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences (CHÉOS), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    Nick Bansback

  5. Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Canada

    France Légaré

  6. Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Deborah A. Marshall

  7. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Meenakshi Bewtra

  8. Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Meenakshi Bewtra

  9. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Meenakshi Bewtra

Authors
  1. Jan Ostermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Derek S. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Janine A. van Til
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nick Bansback
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. France Légaré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Deborah A. Marshall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Meenakshi Bewtra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Ostermann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ostermann, J., Brown, D.S., van Til, J.A. et al. Support Tools for Preference-Sensitive Decisions in Healthcare: Where Are We? Where Do We Go? How Do We Get There?. Patient 12, 439–443 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-019-00372-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-019-00372-z

Search

Navigation