Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge and consumption of emergency contraception pills in a tertiary education student population

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Therapy Perspectives Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), every year there are 200 million pregnancies, of which 75 million are unintended. Emergency contraception pills (ECPs) are one of the available methods to prevent an unintended pregnancy, after unprotected sexual intercourse or contraceptive failure. The aim of this study was to quantify the consumption, characterize the level of knowledge, and understand the factors that induce the use of ECPs in tertiary students.

Methods

An observational, cross-sectional, and retrospective survey was conducted at two tertiary education institutions (Coimbra Health School and Coimbra Education School) between January and April 2015. A written survey was applied to a convenience sample of female and male students at these schools. The survey questions comprised three areas: sociodemographic indicators; knowledge of ECPs; and previous consumption of ECPs (females only). Descriptive statistics and chi-square of independence test were used.

Results

Most of the students had heard about ECPs and used them mainly for “forgetfulness or contraceptive failure” (63.8%) or “sex without using a contraceptive” (22.4%). Students’ main information sources were school, friends, and the internet. There was a higher level of knowledge in female students, students from the Coimbra Health School (vs students from the Coimbra Education School), and students who had received healthcare professional counseling (p < 0.01). Regarding consumption, the majority (74.1%) were first-time users of ECPs and almost all ECPs were obtained in the pharmacy (91.4%).

Conclusions

In Portugal, ECPs are available over the counter, which facilitates their obtainment. There was some knowledge among students, however lack of information about this subject should be taken into account in further studies. Communication with the students to improve their risk perception and knowledge is key to improving the safer use of ECPs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reis M, de Matos MG. Contracepção em jovens universitários portugueses. Análise Psicológica. 2008;26(1):71–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nunes MT. Conhecimento e utilização da contracepção de emergência em alunas do ensino secundário em Guimarães. Rev Port Med Gen Fam. 2005;21(3):247–56.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Luthra R. Contraception counselling and compliance. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:B–C.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sedgh G, Singh S, Hussain R. Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plan. 2014;45(3):301–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tavares M, Barros H. Unplanned pregnancy in Portugal. Acta Med Port. 1997;10(5):351–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eurostat. Teenage and older mothers in the EU. 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20170808-1. Accessed 19 Jun 2018.

  7. Corbett PO, Mitchell CP, Taylor JS, et al. Emergency contraception: knowledge and perceptions in a university population. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006;18(4):161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Downing A. University students’ knowledge and attitudes toward emergency contraception pills. J Community Health Nurs. 2014;31(2):75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hickey MT. Female college students’ knowledge, perceptions, and use of emergency contraception. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2009;38(4):399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoque ME, Ghuman S. Knowledge, practices, and attitudes of emergency contraception among female university students in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e46346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lathrop E, Telemaque Y, Haddad L, et al. Knowledge and use of and opportunities for emergency contraception in Northern Haiti. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2013;121(1):60–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Olszewski J, Olszewska H, Abacjew A, et al. The use of emergency contraception in young Polish women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(7):861–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Weisberg E, Fraser IS. Rights to emergency contraception. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;106(2):160–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shohel M, Rahman MM, Zaman A, et al. A systematic review of effectiveness and safety of different regimens of levonorgestrel oral tablets for emergency contraception. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14(1):54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Falah-Hassani K, Kosunen E, Shiri R, et al. Emergency contraception among Finnish adolescents: awareness, use and the effect of non-prescription status. BMC Public Health. 2007;7(1):201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Byamugisha JK, Mirembe FM, Faxelid E, et al. Emergency contraception and fertility awareness among university students in Kampala, Uganda. Afr Health Sci. 2006;6(4):194–200.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Baird AS, Trussell J, Webb A. Use of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a follow-up study. J Fam Plan Reprod Heal Care. 2015;41(2):116–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cameron ST, Gordon R, Glasier A. The effect on use of making emergency contraception available free of charge. Contraception. 2012;86(4):366–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahern R, Frattarelli LA, Delto J, et al. Knowledge and awareness of emergency contraception in adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2010;23(5):273–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lech MM, Ostrowska L, Swiątek E. Emergency contraception in a country with restricted access to contraceptives and termination of pregnancy, a prospective follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(10):1183–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Noé G, Croxatto HB, Salvatierra AM, et al. Contraceptive efficacy of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel given before or after ovulation. Contraception. 2011;84(5):486–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gedeon Richter, Plc. Postinor: summary of product characteristics [in Portuguese]. 2016. https://gedeonrichter.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Postinor-1500-mcg-tbl_PIL_pt_agosto2016.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2018.

  23. Gainer E, Guillard H, Gicquel D, et al. Ulipristal acetate tablets. Google patents; 2014.

  24. Laboratoire HRA Pharma. ellaOne 30 mg tablet: summary of product characteristics. 2018. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/001027/WC500023670.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2018.

  25. Brache V, Cochon L, Jesam C, et al. Immediate pre-ovulatory administration of 30 mg ulipristal acetate significantly delays follicular rupture. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(9):2256–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fine P, Mathé H, Ginde S, et al. Ulipristal acetate taken 48–120 hours after intercourse for emergency contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(2):257–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Glasier A, Cameron ST, Blithe D, et al. Can we identify women at risk of pregnancy despite using emergency contraception? Data from randomized trials of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel. Contraception. 2011;84(4):363–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Festin MPR, Peregoudov A, Seuc A, et al. Effect of BMI and body weight on pregnancy rates with LNG as emergency contraception: analysis of four WHO HRP studies. Contraception. 2017;95(1):50–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lei n.o 12/2001, de 29 de Maio—Diário da República, n.o 124, Série I-A, de 2001-05-29—Contracepção de emergência.

  30. Chofakian CB, Borges ALV, Fujimori E, et al. Conhecimento sobre anticoncepção de emergência entre adolescentes do Ensino Médio de escolas públicas e privadas. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30:1525–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Waltermaurer E, Doleyres HM, Bednarczyk RA, et al. Emergency contraception considerations and use among college women. J Women’s Health. 2013;22(2):141–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Israel GD. Determining sample size. Program evaluation and organizational development, fact sheet PEOD-6. Florida: Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. 1992.

  33. Italia S, Brand H. Status of emergency contraceptives in Europe one year after the European Medicines Agency’s recommendation to switch ulipristal acetate to non-prescription status. Public Health Genom. 2016;19(4):203–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The manuscript has been read and approved by all authors and all authors agree to the submission of the manuscript to the journal. The authors would like to thank Amy Downing for permission to use the questionnaire and Clara Rocha, Ph.D. at the Coimbra Health School for her contribution to the data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Joaquim.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the involved institutions. Confidentiality of the participants was assured.

Informed consent

Informed consent forms were signed by all participants.

Funding

No sources of funding was used to assist in the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare to have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joaquim, J., Reis, M., Matos, C. et al. Knowledge and consumption of emergency contraception pills in a tertiary education student population. Drugs Ther Perspect 34, 583–589 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-018-0557-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-018-0557-4

Navigation