Advertisement

Cost-Effectiveness of a Psycho-Educational Intervention Targeting Fear of Cancer Recurrence in People Treated for Early-Stage Melanoma

  • Mbathio DiengEmail author
  • Nikita Khanna
  • Nadine A. Kasparian
  • Daniel S. J. Costa
  • Phyllis N. Butow
  • Scott W. Menzies
  • Graham J. Mann
  • Anne E Cust
  • Rachael L. Morton
Original Research Article

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of a newly developed psycho-educational intervention to reduce fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in early-stage melanoma patients.

Methods

A within-trial cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis was conducted from the Australian health system perspective using data from linked Medicare records. Outcomes included FCR, measured with the severity subscale of the FCR Inventory; quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) measured using the preference-based instrument, Assessment of Quality of Life-8 Dimensions (AQoL-8D) and 12-month survival. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for two economic outcomes: (1) cost per additional case of ‘high’ FCR avoided and (2) cost per QALY gained. Means and 95% CIs around the ICER were generated from non-parametric bootstrapping with 1000 replications.

Results

A total of 151 trial participants were included in the economic evaluation. The mean cost of the psycho-educational intervention was AU$1614 per participant, including intervention development costs. The ICER per case of high FCR avoided was AU$12,903. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve demonstrated a 78% probability of the intervention being cost effective relative to the control at a threshold of AU$50,000 per extra person avoiding FCR. The ICER per QALY gained was AU$116,126 and the probability of the intervention being cost effective for this outcome was 36% at a willingness to pay of AU$50,000 per QALY.

Conclusion

The psycho-educational intervention reduced FCR at 12 months for people at high risk of developing another melanoma and may represent good value for money. For the QALY outcome, the psycho-educational intervention is unlikely to be cost effective at standard government willingness-to-pay levels. The trial was prospectively registered in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (CTRN12613000304730).

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the men and women who participated in this trial, the consumer representatives who reviewed the study protocol and psycho-educational resource, the psychologists who delivered the intervention (Shab Mireskandari, Jacqueline Tonin, Elaine Lopis), Amelia Smit and Brooke Beswick for assistance with recruitment and data collection, and Helen Schmid, Leo Raudonikis, Sharon Lorger and staff at each of the High Risk Melanoma Clinics for facilitating conduct of the study. This study has been endorsed by the Australian and New Zealand Melanoma Trials Group (ANZMTG) and by the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG).

Author contributions

MD: conceptualization, funding acquisition, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, and Writing—review and editing. NK: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. NAK: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, validation, visualization, and writing—review and editing. DC: conceptualization, methodology, validation, visualization, and writing—review and editing. PNB: conceptualization, methodology, validation, visualization, and writing—review and editing. SWM: conceptualization, funding acquisition, validation, visualization, and writing—review and editing. GJM: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, validation, visualization, and writing—review and editing. AEC: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, validation, visualization, and writing—review and editing. RLM: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, validation, visualization, and writing—review and editing.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding/support

This study was supported in part by a Cancer Institute New South Wales (NSW) Translational Program Grant (to G. J. M., S. W. M.; 05/TPG/1-01 and 10/TPG/1-02), a project Grant from beyondblue: The National Depression Initiative (to N. A. K.; 630575), and a Sydney Catalyst Top-Up Research Scholar Award (to M.D.). A. E. C. was supported by fellowships from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (1147843) and Cancer Institute NSW (15/CDF/1-14). M. D. received a scholarship through a Cancer Institute NSW fellowship to A. E. C. and a Sydney Catalyst Top-Up Research Scholar Award and Sydney Medical School Kick start grant. N. A. K. is the recipient of fellowships from the NHMRC (1049238) and the National Heart Foundation of Australia (101229). R. L. M. was supported by an NHMRC Sidney Sax Early Career Fellowship (1054216). P. N. B. was supported by an NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship (1022582).

Financial disclosure

None reported.

Ethics

The study protocol was approved by relevant Ethics Committees; the Sydney Local Health District (RPAH zone) Ethics Review Committee (X13-0065 and HREC/13/RPAH/86), the Department of Health and Ageing Human Research Ethics Committee (21/2013), the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2013/595), and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Ethics Committee (EO 2013/4/58). The trial was prospectively registered in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (CTRN12613000304730). We obtained written informed consent from all participants.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflict of interest disclosures from any authors including Mbathio Dieng, Nikita Khanna, Nadine Kasparian, Daniel Costa, Phyllis Butow, Scott Menzies, Graham Mann, Anne Cust and Rachael Morton.

Data availability statement

Australian Medicare data are unable to be shared publicly as participant consent was not sought for this purpose at the time of trial recruitment.

Supplementary material

40258_2019_483_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ellegaard M-BB, Grau C, Zachariae R, Bonde Jensen A. Fear of cancer recurrence and unmet needs among breast cancer survivors in the first five years. A cross-sectional study. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(2):314–20.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ghazali N, Cadwallader E, Lowe D, et al. Fear of recurrence among head and neck cancer survivors: longitudinal trends: trends of fear of recurrence in head and neck cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(4):807–13.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ozakinci G, Sobota A, Humphris G. Fear of cancer recurrence among breast cancer survivors. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2014;6(3):219–25.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ozga M, Aghajanian C, Myers-Virtue S, et al. A systematic review of ovarian cancer and fear of recurrence. Palliat Support Care. 2015;13(6):1771–80.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thewes B, Lebel S, Leclair CS, Butow P. A qualitative exploration of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) amongst Australian and Canadian breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(5):2269–76.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dieng M, Kasparian NA, Cust AE, et al. Sensitivity of preference-based quality-of-life measures for economic evaluations in early-stage melanoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(1):52–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simard S, Thewes B, Humphris G, et al. Fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review of quantitative studies. J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7(3):300–22.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thewes B, Butow P, Bell ML, et al. Fear of cancer recurrence in young women with a history of early-stage breast cancer: a cross-sectional study of prevalence and association with health behaviours. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(11):2651–9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lebel S, Tomei C, Feldstain A, Beattie S, McCallum M. Does fear of cancer recurrence predict cancer survivors’ health care use? Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(3):901–6.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sabariego C, Brach M, Herschbach P, Berg P, Stucki G. Cost-effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral group therapy for dysfunctional fear of progression in cancer patients. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(5):489–97.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kittler H, Weitzdorfer R, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Compliance with follow-up and prognosis among patients with thin melanomas. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37(12):1504–9.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kasparian NA. Psychological stress and melanoma: are we meeting our patients’ psychological needs? Clin Dermatol. 2013;31(1):41–6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McLoone JK, Watts KJ, Menzies SW, et al. Melanoma survivors at high risk of developing new primary disease: a qualitative examination of the factors that contribute to patient satisfaction with clinical care. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(9):1994–2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tan JD, Butow PN, Boyle FM, Saw RPM, O’Reilly AJ. A qualitative assessment of psychosocial impact, coping and adjustment in high-risk melanoma patients and caregivers. Melanoma Res. 2014;24(3):252–60.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cameron LD, Booth RJ, Schlatter M, Ziginskas D, Harman JE. Changes in emotion regulation and psychological adjustment following use of a group psychosocial support program for women recently diagnosed with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2007;16(3):171–80.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chambers SK, Foley E, Galt E, Ferguson M, Clutton S. Mindfulness groups for men with advanced prostate cancer: a pilot study to assess feasibility and effectiveness and the role of peer support. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(6):1183–92.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heinrichs N, Zimmermann T, Huber B, et al. Cancer distress reduction with a couple-based skills training: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2012;43(2):239–52.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herschbach P, Book K, Dinkel A, et al. Evaluation of two group therapies to reduce fear of progression in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(4):471–9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Humphris G, Rogers S. AFTER and beyond: cancer recurrence fears and a test of an intervention in oral and oropharyngeal patients. Soc Sci Dent. 2012;2(1):29–38.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lebel S, Maheu C, Lefebvre M, et al. Addressing fear of cancer recurrence among women with cancer: a feasibility and preliminary outcome study. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(3):485–96.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lengacher CA, Johnson-Mallard V, Barta M, et al. Feasibility of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program for early-stage breast cancer survivors. J Holist Nurs. 2011;29(2):107–17.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lengacher CA, Johnson-Mallard V, Post-White J, et al. Randomized controlled trial of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) for survivors of breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2009;18(12):1261–72.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith AB, Thewes B, Turner J, et al. Pilot of a theoretically grounded psychologist-delivered intervention for fear of cancer recurrence (Conquer Fear): Conquer Fear: a promising new treatment for fear of cancer recurrence. Psycho-Oncology. 2015;24(8):967–70.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dieng M, Cust AE, Kasparian NA, Mann GJ, Morton RL. Economic evaluations of psychosocial interventions in cancer: a systematic review: economic evaluations of psychosocial interventions in cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2016;25(12):1380–92.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dieng M, Cust AE, Kasparian NA, et al. Protocol for a within-trial economic evaluation of a psychoeducational intervention tailored to people at high risk of developing a second or subsequent melanoma. BMJ Open. 2016;6(10):e012153.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kasparian NA, Mireskandari S, Butow PN, et al. “Melanoma: Questions and Answers.” Development and evaluation of a psycho-educational resource for people with a history of melanoma. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(12):4849–59.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dieng M, Kasparian N, Mireskandari S, et al. Psychoeducational intervention for people at high risk of developing another melanoma: a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e015195.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dieng M, Kasparian NA, Morton RL, et al. The melanoma care study: protocol of a randomised controlled trial of a psycho-educational intervention for melanoma survivors at high risk of developing new primary disease. BMC Psychol. 2015;3(1):23.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dieng M, Butow PN, Costa DSJ, et al. Psychoeducational intervention to reduce fear of cancer recurrence in people at high risk of developing another primary melanoma: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(36):4405–14.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. BMJ Br Med J. 2013;346:f1049.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    McLoone J, Watts K, Menzies S, et al. When the risks are high: psychological adjustment among melanoma survivors at high risk of developing new primary disease. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(8):1102–13.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Costa DSJ, Dieng M, Cust AE, Butow PN, Kasparian NA. Psychometric properties of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory: an item response theory approach: Item response theory analysis of the fear of cancer recurrence inventory. Psycho-Oncology. 2016;25(7):832–8.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Simard S, Savard J. Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory: development and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of fear of cancer recurrence. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(3):241–51.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Maxwell A, Özmen M, Iezzi A, Richardson J. Deriving population norms for the AQoL-6D and AQoL-8D multi-attribute utility instruments from web-based data. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(12):3209–19.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Richardson J, Sinha K, Iezzi A, Khan MA. Modelling utility weights for the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-8D. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(8):2395–404.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics. Consumer Price Index, Australia. 2018. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS. Accessed 26 Oct 2018.
  37. 37.
    The University of Sydney Enterprise Agreement 2013–2017. Schedule 1, pp. 65–75. U.o. Sydney, Editor. 2013. Retrieved from: http://sydney.edu.au/staff/enterprise_agreement/documents/university-of-sydney-enterprise-agreement-2013-2017.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2019.
  38. 38.
    Singtel Optus Pty Limited. Home phone plans. http://www.optus.com.au/shop/home-phone/plans. Accessed 30 Oct 2017.
  39. 39.
    Schafer JL, Yucel RM. Computational strategies for multivariate linear mixed-effects models with missing values. J Comput Graph Stat. 2002;11(2):437–57.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Australian Government. Guidelines for preparing a submission to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee Version 5.0 D.o. Health. 2016. https://pbac.pbs.gov.au/. Accessed 30 Oct 2017.
  41. 41.
    Efron B. Missing data, imputation, and the bootstrap. J Am Stat Assoc. 1994;89(426):463–75.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Fenwick E, O’Brien BJ, Briggs A. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves—facts, fallacies and frequently asked questions. Health Econ. 2004;13(5):405–15.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fardell JE, Jones G, Smith AB, et al. Exploring the screening capacity of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-short form for clinical levels of fear of cancer recurrence. Psycho‐Oncology. 2017;27(2):492–9.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brusco NK, Watts JJ. Empirical evidence of recall bias for primary health care visits. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:381.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mbathio Dieng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nikita Khanna
    • 1
  • Nadine A. Kasparian
    • 2
  • Daniel S. J. Costa
    • 3
  • Phyllis N. Butow
    • 4
  • Scott W. Menzies
    • 5
  • Graham J. Mann
    • 6
  • Anne E Cust
    • 7
  • Rachael L. Morton
    • 8
  1. 1.NHMRC Clinical Trials CentreThe University of SydneyCamperdownAustralia
  2. 2.School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Faculty of MedicineThe University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Pain Management Research Institute, Royal North Shore HospitalThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of PsychologyThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred HospitalThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  6. 6.Melanoma Institute Australia, and Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Institute for Medical ResearchThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  7. 7.Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research and Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney School of Public HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  8. 8.NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre and Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations