Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Authors’ Reply to Gandjour “The Cost Effectiveness of High-Dose Versus Conventional Haemodialysis: A Systematic Review”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gandjour A. Comment on “The cost effectiveness of high-dose versus conventional haemodialysis: a systematic review”. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016:1–2. doi:10.1007/s40258-016-0273-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Laplante S, Liu FX, Culleton B, et al. The cost effectiveness of high-dose versus conventional haemodialysis: a systematic review. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(2):185–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blagg CR, Kjellstrand CM, Ting GO, et al. Comparison of survival between short-daily hemodialysis and conventional hemodialysis using the standardized mortality ratio. Hemodial Int. 2006;10:371–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nesrallah GE, Lindsay RM, Cuerden MS, et al. Intensive hemodialysis associates with improved survival compared with conventional hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:696–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Marshall MR, Hawley CM, Kerr PG, et al. Home hemodialysis and mortality risk in Australian and New Zealand populations. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;58:782–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinhandl ED, Liu J, Gilbertson DT, et al. Survival in daily home hemodialysis and matched thrice-weekly in-center hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:895–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu FX, Treharne C, Arici M, et al. High-dose hemodialysis versus conventional in- hemodialysis: a cost-utility analysis from a UK payer perspective. Value Health. 2015;18:17–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johansen KL, Zhang R, Huang Y, et al. Survival and hospitalization among patients using nocturnal and short daily compared to conventional hemodialysis: a USRDS study. Kidney Int. 2009;76:984–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, 60015, USA

    Suzanne Laplante, Frank X. Liu, Bruce Culleton & Angelito Bernardo

  2. Abacus International, Bicester, UK

    Denise King & Pollyanna Hudson

Authors
  1. Suzanne Laplante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frank X. Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bruce Culleton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Angelito Bernardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Denise King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pollyanna Hudson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denise King.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This reply was funded by Baxter Healthcare Corporation.

Conflict of interest

S. Laplante, A. Bernardo, F. X. Liu, and B. Culleton are employees of Baxter Healthcare Corporation. D. King and P. Hudson received consultancy fees from Baxter Healthcare Corporation.

Additional information

This reply refers to the commentary article available at doi:10.1007/s40258-016-0273-y

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laplante, S., Liu, F.X., Culleton, B. et al. Authors’ Reply to Gandjour “The Cost Effectiveness of High-Dose Versus Conventional Haemodialysis: A Systematic Review”. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 14, 731–732 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-016-0284-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-016-0284-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation