Application of protection motivation theory to diabetic foot care Behaviours in Egypt

Abstract

Purpose

Foot care behaviours are considered the first line of defense against diabetic foot complications. In general, preventive behaviours are determined by multiple personal, social and psychological factors. The aim of this study was to assess foot care behaviours and their relation to protection motivation theory among a sample of adults with diabetes in Egypt.

Methods

A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data about foot care practices and protection motivation theory among a random sample of 300 adults with diabetes attending primary health care units in Egypt.

Results

The results demonstrated that the foot care behaviours were inadequate amongst the sample(mean 5.13 ± 1.92 out of 11). Three constructs of protection motivation theory predicted the behaviours, namely: self-efficacy (p = 0.015), perceived seriousness (p = 0.013) and intention to adhere to foot care (p = 0.021). On the other hand, intention to adhere to foot care was correlated with higher levels of self-efficacy and perceived seriousness, and to lower levels of perceived barriers.

Conclusion

There was a low level of foot self-care amongst the sample. Health education programs reinforcing the intention to adhere to foot care behaviours can improve foot care practices among people with diabetes through increasing self-efficacy and perceived seriousness and reducing perceived barriers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 8th edn. https://www.idf.org/e-library/epidemiology-research/diabetes-atlas/134-idf-diabetes-atlas-8th-edition.html. Accessed 14 August 2019.

  2. 2.

    International Diabetes Federation. IDF clinical practice recommendations on the diabetic foot 2017. https://www.idf.org/e-library/guidelines/119-idf-clinical-practice-recommendations-on-diabetic-foot-2017.html . Accessed 10 October 2019.

  3. 3.

    Calle-Pascual AL, Duran A, Benedi A, Calvo MI, Charro A, Diaz JA, et al. Reduction in foot ulcer incidence: relation to compliance with a prophylactic foot care program. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(2):405–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lincoln NB, Radford KA, Game FL, Jeffcoate WJ. Education for secondary prevention of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2008;51:1954–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    George H, Rakesh P, Krishna M, Alex R, Vinod JA, George K, et al. Foot care knowledge and practices and the prevalence of peripheral neuropathy among people with diabetes attending a secondary care rural hospital in southern India. J Family Med Primary Care. 2013;2(1):27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    American Diabetes Association. Foot complications. https://www.diabetes.org/diabetes/complications/foot-complications. Accessed 4 January 2020.

  7. 7.

    Milne S, Sheeran P, Orbell S. Prediction and intervention in health-related behaviour: a meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2006;30(1):106–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rogers RW, Prentice-Dunn S. Protection motivation theory. In: Gochman DS, editor. Handbook of health behaviour research: personal and social determinants. New York: Plenum Press; 1997. p. 113–32.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Plotnikoff RC, Lippke S, Trinh L, Courneya KS, Birkett N, Ronald J. Protection motivation theory and the prediction of physical activity among adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in a large population sample. Sigal. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15(3):643–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ali Morowatisharifabad M, Abdolkarimi M, Asadpour M, Fathollahi MS, Balaee P. The predictive effects of protection motivation theory on intention and behaviour of physical activity in patients with type 2 diabetes. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6:709–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jacob JM. The impact of protection motivation theory grounded messaging on diabetes prevention behaviours following gestational diabetes. Western Ontario: University of West Ontario. 2013https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1187/. Accessed 15 January 2020.

  12. 12.

    Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics. Population census 2018. Cairo: Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics, 2018. https://academic.oup.com/heapro/article/28/2/197/662479?searchresult=1. Accessed 19 March 2019.

  13. 13.

    Tan MY. The relationship of health beliefs and complication prevention behaviours of Chinese individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004;66(1):71–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Perrin BM, Snow PC. Foot care confidence in people with diabetes. Australian J Podiatric Med. 2006;40(1):3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gillibrand R, Stevenson J. The extended health belief model applied to the experience of diabetes in young people. Br J Health Psychol. 2006;11(1):155–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hsieh YL, Lee FH, Chen CL, Chang MF, Han PH. Factors influencing intention to receive examination of diabetes complications. Asian Nurs Res. 2016;10(4):289–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Jones CL, Jensen JD, Scherr CL, Brown NR, Christy K, Weaver J. The health belief model as an explanatory framework in communication research: exploring parallel, serial, and moderated mediation. Health Commun. 2015;30(6):566–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Viswanathan V, Madhavan S, Rajasekar S, Chamukkuttan S, Ambady R. Amputation prevention initiative in South India. Positive impact of foot care education. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(5):1019–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Adams RJ. Improving health outcomes with better patient understanding and education. Risk ManagHealthc Policy. 2010;3:61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chiwanga FS, Njelekela MA. Diabetic foot: prevalence, knowledge, and foot self-care practices among diabetic patients in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania – a cross-sectional study. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015;8(1):20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Saurabh S, Sarkar S, Selvaraj K, Kar SS, Kumar SG, Roy G. Effectiveness of foot care education among people with type 2 diabetes in rural Puducherry, India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18(1):106–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Subhashini S, Shah PB. Awareness and practice regarding foot self-care among patients of known type 2 diabetes mellitus in a rural area. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2016;3(4):861–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hemin JS, Daoud AS. Knowledge and practice about the foot care and the prevalence of the neuropathy among a sample of type 2 diabetic patients in Erbil, Iraq. J Family Med Prim Care. 2018;7(5):967–74.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Solan YM, Kheir HM, Mahfouz MS, Al-Faify AA, Hakami DT, Al Faifi MA, et al. Diabetic foot care: knowledge and practice. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;6(6):172–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wu SC, Huang JH. The effects of diabetes shared care on patients' glycated hemoglobin, health beliefs, and health behaviours. Taiwan J Pub Health. 2013;32(6):537–50.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Huang YY, Lin KD, Jiang YD, Chang CH, Chung CH, Chuang LM, et al. Diabetes related kidney, eye, and foot disease in Taiwan: an analysis of the nationwide data for 2000e2009. J Formos Med Assoc. 2012;111(11):637–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Chin YF, Tzu-Ting Huang TT, Hsu BR. Impact of action cues, self-efficacy and perceived barriers on daily foot exam practice in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with peripheral neuropathy. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(1–2):61–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank all the staff of Damanhour directorate of health as well as the people with diabetes who were willing to give their time to participate in the study.

Funding

The research was funded by the author.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sherine Hassan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassan, S. Application of protection motivation theory to diabetic foot care Behaviours in Egypt. J Diabetes Metab Disord 19, 869–873 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-020-00573-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Diabetic foot
  • Foot care
  • Protection motivation theory
  • Intention