Advertisement

The Potential of Digital Technology to Improve Self-Care for Musculoskeletal Conditions

  • Courtenay Stewart
  • Ryan Fraiser
  • Patricia Zheng
Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation (J Friedly, Section Editor)
  • 51 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Digital technology offers a broad range of tools that can be used to enhance health care. We aim to summarize for the physiatrist use-cases of these tools in musculoskeletal self-care.

Recent Finding

Recent advances in and increasing prevalence of wearable sensors and mobile phones make these digital technologies ideal tools to help patients become active participants in their own healthcare. However, given digital health technologies’ fast-paced growth and turnover, implementation and research challenges remain.

Summary

Digital technology provides novel methods to objectively evaluate patients and to engage them in active rehabilitation. Further research is needed to guide the adaptation of these emerging tools to enhance self-care of musculoskeletal conditions. Physiatrists, who have extensive experience in non-surgical management of mobility-limiting conditions, are particularly equipped to lead the efforts in the design and validation of these technologies.

Keywords

Digital technology Mobile health Musculoskeletal conditions Non-operative care 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Palazzo C, Ravaud J-F, Papelard A, Ravaud P, Poiraudeau S. The burden of musculoskeletal conditions. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e90633.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090633.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    2014. Report [Internet]. BMUS: The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States. [cited 2017 Aug 9]. Available from: http://www.boneandjointburden.org/2.-report
  3. 3.
    Health C for D and R. Digital Health [Internet]. [cited 2017 Oct 31]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/digitalhealth/
  4. 4.
    Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1(1):64.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-64.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yilmaz F, Sahin F, Ergoz E, Deniz E, Ercalik C, Yucel SD, et al. Quality of life assessments with SF 36 in different musculoskeletal diseases. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27(3):327–32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-007-0717-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zajac FE, Winters JM. Modeling musculoskeletal movement systems: joint and body segmental dynamics, musculoskeletal actuation, and neuromuscular control. In: Multiple Muscle Systems [Internet]. Springer, New York, NY; 1990 [cited 2017 Aug 9]. p. 121–48. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4613-9030-5_8
  7. 7.
    Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, John CT, et al. OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54(11):1940–50.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2007.901024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clark RA, Pua Y-H, Fortin K, Ritchie C, Webster KE, Denehy L. Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control. Gait Posture. 2012;36(3):372–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.033.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fitzgerald D, Foody J, Kelly D, Ward T, Markham C, McDonald J, et al. Development of a wearable motion capture suit and virtual reality biofeedback system for the instruction and analysis of sports rehabilitation exercises. In: 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2007. p. 4870–4.  https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4353431
  10. 10.
    Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M, et al. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(1):181–8.  https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shih M, Hootman JM, Kruger J, Helmick CG. Physical activity in men and women with arthritis: National Health Interview Survey, 2002. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(5):385–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin C-WC, McAuley JH, Macedo L, Barnett DC, Smeets RJ, Verbunt JA. Relationship between physical activity and disability in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2011;152(3):607–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.034.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Esser S, Bailey A. Effects of exercise and physical activity on knee osteoarthritis. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011;15(6):423–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-011-0225-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Talbot LA, Gaines JM, Huynh TN, Metter EJ. A home-based pedometer-driven walking program to increase physical activity in older adults with osteoarthritis of the knee: a preliminary study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(3):387–92.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51113.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferguson T. Digital doctoring—opportunities and challenges in electronic patient-physician communication. JAMA. 1998;280(15):1361–2.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.15.1361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K. Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care? JAMA. 2003;290(2):259–64.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.2.259.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    TMT Predictions collection| Deloitte | Technology, Media & Telecommunications [Internet]. Deloitte. [cited 2017 Oct 31]. Available from: https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/technology-media-and-telecommunications/articles/tmt-predictions-collection.html.
  18. 18.
    Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT, Shekelle P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(7):478–91.  https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Buchholz SW, Wilbur J, Ingram D, Fogg L. Physical activity text messaging interventions in adults: a systematic review. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs. 2013;10(3):163–73.  https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Americans’ Internet Access:<br>2000–2015 [Internet]. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. 2015 [cited 2017 Jan 8]. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/.
  21. 21.
    van den Berg-Emons RJ, Schasfoort FC, de Vos LA, Bussmann JB, Stam HJ. Impact of chronic pain on everyday physical activity. Eur J Pain. 2007;11(5):587–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.09.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Greaves CJ, Sheppard KE, Abraham C, Hardeman W, Roden M, Evans PH, et al. Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):119.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-119.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Althoff T, Jindal P, Leskovec J. Online actions with offline impact: how online social networks influence online and offline user behavior. ArXiv161203053 Cs [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.03053.
  24. 24.
    Althoff T, White RW, Horvitz E. Influence of Pokémon Go on physical activity: study and implications. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(12):e315.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6759.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Howe KB, Suharlim C, Ueda P, Howe D, Kawachi I, Rimm EB. Gotta catch’em all! Pokémon GO and physical activity among young adults: difference in differences study. BMJ. 2016;355:i6270.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ayoade M, Baillie L. A novel knee rehabilitation system for the home. In: Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems [Internet]. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2014. p. 2521–2530. (CHI ‘14). Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557353.
  27. 27.
    Favolla D. Home [Internet]. Muvr. [cited 2017 Nov 14]. Available from: https://getmuvr.com/.
  28. 28.
    Cortez NG, Cohen IG, Kesselheim AS. FDA regulation of mobile health technologies. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(4):372–9.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMhle1403384.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    de la Vega R, Miró J. mHealth: a strategic field without a solid scientific soul. A systematic review of pain-related apps. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101312.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101312.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Boulos MNK, Brewer AC, Karimkhani C, Buller DB, Dellavalle RP. Mobile medical and health apps: state of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification. Online J Public Health Inform. 2014;5(3):229.  https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v5i3.4814.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bolster NM, Bastawrous A, Giardini ME. Towards a workflow driven design for mHealth devices within temporary eye clinics in low-income settings. Conf Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Conf. 2015;2015:7312–5.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fife E, Orjuela J. Mobile phones and user perceptions of privacy and security. 2012 Int Conf Mob Bus [Internet]. 2012. Available from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/icmb2012/23.
  33. 33.
    Patel MS, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA. 2015;313(5):459–60.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.14781.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Courtenay Stewart
    • 1
  • Ryan Fraiser
    • 1
  • Patricia Zheng
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryStanford UniversityRedwood CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of California, San Francisco (UCSF)San FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations