Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: Is It Just One Disease?

  • Diagnosis and Monitoring of Glaucoma (R Kuchtey, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Ophthalmology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This article reviews evidence from the literature suggesting that primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) represents a group of heterogeneous diseases with varying clinical features rather than a single disease.

Recent Findings

A growing body of evidence has been made available recently indicating that POAG behaves differently in different subpopulations. Although normal tension glaucoma has long been regarded as a diagnosis distinct from POAG, a considerable degree of overlap exists in their pathophysiology and clinical characteristics and suggests that intraocular pressure alone is not a reliable means of separating POAG into different subtypes. Meanwhile, POAG patients with initial paracentral visual field defects rather than early peripheral defects more often exhibit systemic vascular dysregulation, regardless of whether their intraocular pressures are high or low. Patients of African and Afro-Caribbean heritage develop a subtype of POAG that manifests at an earlier age, displays a more rapid disease course, and leads to blindness more frequently than do patients of European descent.

Summary

Recognizing the existence of various POAG subtypes differentiated by factors other than intraocular pressure alone will allow clinicians to diagnose glaucoma more accurately and provide more individualized care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Ramulu PY, van Landingham SW, Massof RW, Chan ES, Ferrucci L, Friedman DS. Fear of falling and visual field loss from glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(7):1352–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. • Qiu M, Wang SY, Singh K, Lin SC. Association between visual field defects and quality of life in the United States. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(3):733–40. This survey-based cross-sectional study demonstrated greater difficulty with vision-related and physical function in patients with more severe visual field defects.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. • McGwin G Jr, Huisingh C, Jain SG, Girkin CA, Owsley C. Binocular visual field impairment in glaucoma and at-fault motor vehicle collisions. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(2):138–43. This retrospective study showed that drivers with glaucoma and severe binocular pattern deviation defects were at higher risk for at-fault motor vehicle collisions than patients with less impaired fields.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. • Medeiros FA, Gracitelli CP, Boer ER, et al. Longitudinal changes in quality of life and rates of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(2):293–301. This study used patient questionnaires to demonstrate an association between greater degrees of visual field loss and longitudinal changes in quality of life in glaucoma patients.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. •• Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–90. This study reviewed the estimated prevalence of glaucoma worldwide based on analysis of 50 population-based studies and offered predictions regarding the number of patients who will be affected by glaucoma in the future.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):714–20. discussion 829-30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A, Quigley HA, Javitt JC. Family history and risk of primary open angle glaucoma. The Baltimore eye survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(1):69–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Allingham RR, Damji KF, Freedman S, et al. Introduction: an overview of glaucoma. In: Allingham RR, Damji KF, Freedman S, Moroi SE, Rhee DJ, editors. Shields textbook of glaucoma. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shields MB. Normal-tension glaucoma: is it different from primary open-angle glaucoma? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(2):85–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. • Pruzan NL, Myers JS. Phenotypic differences in normal vs high tension glaucoma. J Neuroophthalmol. 2015;35(Suppl 1):S4–7. This review summarizes evidence supporting the view that primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma lie along a single continuum of disease and share many clinical features.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. • Sood V, Ramanathan US. Self-monitoring of intraocular pressure outside of normal office hours using rebound tonometry: initial clinical experience in patients with normal tension glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(10):807–11. This study demonstrates the detection of peak nighttime intraocular pressure measurements in patients using at-home rebound tonometry.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. • Gautam N, Kaur S, Kaushik S, Raj S, Pandav SS. Postural and diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(4):537–41. This prospective, cross-sectional study showed that supine intraocular pressure measurements are significantly higher than those measured in the sitting position in normal patients as well as in patients with ocular hypertension, normal tension glaucoma, and primary open angle glaucoma.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Caprioli J, Spaeth GL. Comparison of the optic nerve head in high- and low-tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(8):1145–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Drance S, Anderson DR, Schulzer M, Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Risk factors for progression of visual field abnormalities in normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131(6):699–708.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bengtsson B, Leske MC, Yang Z, EMGT Group, et al. Disc hemorrhages and treatment in the early manfifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(11):2044–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Medeiros FA, Alencar LM, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, Susanna Jr R, Weinreb RN. The relationship between intraocular pressure reduction and rates of progressive visual field loss in eyes with optic disc hemorrhage. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(11):2061–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. • Bojikian KD, Chen CL, Wen JC, Zhang Q, Xin C, Gupta D, et al. Optic disc perfusion in primary open angle and normal tension glaucoma eyes using optical coherence tomography-based microangiography. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154691. This study demonstrated low optic disc perfusion in patients with normal tension glaucoma and primary open angle glaucoma with similar degrees of visual field damage versus normal controls.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Caprioli J, Spaeth GL. Comparison of visual field defects in the low-tension glaucomas with those in the high-tension glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;97(6):730–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Park SC, De Moraes CG, Teng CC, et al. Initial parafoveal versus peripheral scotomas in glaucoma: risk factors and visual field characteristics. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(9):1782–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. • Charlson ME, de Moraes CG, Link A, Wells MT, Harmon G, Peterson JC, et al. Nocturnal systemic hypotension increases the risk of glaucoma progression. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(10):2004–12. This prospective series of patients with normal tension glaucoma showed increased visual field progression among patients with increased cumulative nocturnal systemic hypotension.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Phelps CD, Corbett JJ. Migraine and low-tension glaucoma. A case-control study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26(8):1105–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin PW, Friedman M, Lin HC, Chang HW, Wilson M, Lin MC. Normal tension glaucoma in patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome. J Glaucoma. 2011;20(9):553–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Broadway DC, Drance SM. Glaucoma and vasospasm. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82(8):862–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. • Wu X, Liu H. Obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome increases glaucoma risk: evidence from a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(1):297–303. This meta-analysis of 12 studies demonstrated an association between obstructive sleep apnea and primary open angle glaucoma.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Berdahl JP, Yu DY, Morgan WH. The translaminar pressure gradient in sustained zero gravity, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and glaucoma. Med Hypotheses. 2012;79(6):719–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):498–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. •• Kang JH, Loomis SJ, Rosner BA, Wiggs JL, Pasquale LR. Comparison of risk factor profiles for primary open-angle glaucoma subtypes defined by pattern of visual field loss: a prospective study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(4):2439–48. The authors used data from two large population-based studies to evaluate risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma presenting with paracentral versus peripheral visual field defects.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. • Loomis SJ, Kang JH, Weinreb RN, Yaspan BL, Cooke Bailey JN, Gaasterland D, et al. Association of CAV1/CAV2 genomic variants with primary open-angle glaucoma overall and by gender and pattern of visual field loss. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(2):508–16. This case-control study demonstrated an association between the CAV1 and CAV2 (caveolin 1 and 2) single nucleotide polymorphisms and paracentral visual field defects in patients with primary open angle glaucoma.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiggs JL, Hewitt AW, Fan BJ, Wang DY, Figueiredo Sena DR, O’Brien C, et al. The p53 codon 72 PRO/PRO genotype may be associated with initial central visual field defects in Caucasians with primary open angle glaucoma. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45613.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Buys ES, Ko YC, Alt C, Hayton SR, Jones A, Tainsh LT, et al. Soluble guanylate cyclase α1-deficient mice: a novel murine model for primary open angle glaucoma. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. • Cavet ME, Vittitow JL, Impagnatiello F, Ongini E, Bastia E. Nitric oxide (NO): an emerging target for the treatment of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(8):5005–15. This article reviews the role of nitric oxide in intraocular pressure regulation and provides rationale for targeting this pathway in the development of novel medical therapies for glaucoma.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fujita K, Yasuda N, Oda K, Yuzawa M. Reading performance in patients with central visual field disturbance due to glaucoma. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2006;110:914–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Coeckelbergh TR, Brouwer WH, Cornelissen FW, van Wolffelaar P, Kooijman AC. The effect of visual field defects on driving performance: a driving simulator study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1509–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kolker AE. Visual prognosis in advanced glaucoma: a comparison of medical and surgical therapy for retention of vision in 101 eyes with advanced glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1977;75:539–55.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, Royall RM, Quigley HA, Javitt J. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore eye survey. JAMA. 1991;266(3):369–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Leske MC, Connell AM, Schachat AP, Hyman L. The Barbados eye study. Prevalence of open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(6):821–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mason RP, Kosoko O, Wilson MR, Martone JF, Cowan CL Jr, Gear JC, et al. National survey of the prevalence and risk factors of glaucoma in St. Lucia, West Indies. Part I. Prevalence findings. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(9):1363–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Budenz DL, Barton K, Whiteside-de Vos J, Tema Eye Survey Study Group, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in an urban west African population: the Tema eye survey. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(5):651–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. • Kyari F, Entekume G, Rabiu M, Nigeria National Blindness and Visual Impairment Study Group, et al. A population-based survey of the prevalence and types of glaucoma in Nigeria: results from the Nigeria National Blindness and visual impairment survey. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:176. This population-based study demonstrated a high prevalence of glaucoma in Nigerian patients.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Racette L, Wilson MR, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Sample PA. Primary open-angle glaucoma in blacks: a review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48(3):295–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hiller R, Kahn HA. Blindness from glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;80(1):62–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. •• Pleet A, Sulewski M, Salowe RJ, Fertig R, Salinas J, Rhodes A, et al. Risk factors associated with progression to blindness from primary open-angle glaucoma in an African-American population. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2016;23(4):248–56. This study identified visual acuity < 20/40 at diagnosis, IOP ≥ 21 mm Hg at > 20% of visits, and number of missed appointments as significant risk factors for progression to blindness in African-American patients with primary open angle glaucoma.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. •• Skaat A, De Moraes CG, Bowd C, Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study and African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study Groups, et al. African descent and Glaucoma evaluation study (ADAGES): racial differences in optic disc hemorrhage and beta-zone parapapillary atrophy. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(7):1476–83. This study of close to 10,000 stereoscopic disc photographs of patients with primary open angle glaucoma showed that disc hemorrhages occur more frequently in patients of European descent, while beta-zone parapapillary atrophy is more common in patients of African descent.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. •• Nannini D, Torres M, Chen YD, et al. African ancestry is associated with higher intraocular pressure in Latinos. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):102–8. This study suggested that intraocular pressures are higher in Latino patients with a greater proportion of genetic African ancestry.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wilson R, Richardson TM, Hertzmark E, Grant WM. Race as a risk factor for progressive glaucomatous damage. Ann Ophthalmol. 1985;17:653–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. •• Khachatryan N, Medeiros FA, Sharpsten L, Bowd C, Sample PA, Liebmann JM, et al. The African descent and Glaucoma evaluation study (ADAGES): predictors of visual field damage in glaucoma suspects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(4):777–87. This prospective cohort study showed that patients of African descent were more likely than patients of European descent to develop visual field damage at similarly high mean intraocular pressures.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, EMGT Group, et al. Predictors of long-term progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(11):1965–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Central corneal thickness in the ocular hypertension treatment study (OHTS). Ophthalmology. 2001;108(10):1779–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. •• Bonnemaijer PWM, Cook C, Nag A, Hammond CJ, van Duijn CM, Lemij HG, et al. Genetic African ancestry is associated with central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(7):3172–80. This study suggested that a thin central corneal thickness may not predispose patients with a high proportion of genetic African ancestry to glaucoma development and blindness.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. •• Bokman CL, Pasquale LR, Parrish RK 2nd, et al. Glaucoma screening in the Haitian afro-Caribbean population of South Florida. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e115942. This study of Haitian patients living in South Florida found a high prevalence of glaucoma suspect status in patients under the age of 40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

    Kateki Vinod

  2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA

    Sarwat Salim

Authors
  1. Kateki Vinod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarwat Salim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarwat Salim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Kateki Vinod and Sarwat Salim declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Diagnosis and Monitoring of Glaucoma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vinod, K., Salim, S. Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: Is It Just One Disease?. Curr Ophthalmol Rep 6, 67–72 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-018-0165-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-018-0165-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation