Abstract
Purpose of Review
To review best practices to improve the quality of patient service in the field of interventional radiology prior to performing the procedure.
Recent Findings
We highlight a checklist of elements that have a potential for improvement and contribution to overall quality of patient care from the time of taking the consult, until the time of the procedure. Our check list includes establishing appropriateness of the procedure, reducing waiting times, patient-centered care, patient education, shared decision making, establishing expectations, informed consent, managing the patient’s medication list, preprocedure diet, prevention of CIN, prevention of contrast reactions, pain control and sedation, and coagulation status and hemostasis risk. Several consensus guidelines are referenced in this chapter. However, individual patients and clinical scenario vary and determine which guideline to follow or modify based in clinical judgment.
Summary
The clinic is a key component of success in any Interventional Radiology practice, as it provides the space for consultation, patient education, and preprocedural planning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Recently published papers of particular interest have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Harvey HB, et al. Key performance indicators in radiology: you can’t manage what you can’t measure. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016;45(2):115–21. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.07.014.
Gunn A, Duncan J. Interventional radiology. In: Abujudeh HH, Bruno MA, editors. Radiology noninterpretive skills: the requisites ebook. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.
Huynh TJ, et al. Abstract no. 101 The essential role of the interventional radiology consultation in day-to-day patient care. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(2):S40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2008.12.082.
•• ACR appropriateness criterai. https://acsearch.acr.org/list. The ACR appropriateness criteria are major guidelines for imaging and procedural recommendations that Radiologists abide to during their practice.
Tjahjono D, Kahn CE Jr. Promoting the online use of radiology appropriateness criteria. Radiographics. 1999;19(6):1673–81. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.19.6.g99no301673.
American College of Radiology, and Society of Interventional Radiology. Practice parameter for interventional clinical practice and management. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26(8):1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2015.05.017.
Brady T, Castaneda F, Swischuk J, Smouse B. Re: the Legs for Life screening for peripheral vascular disease: compliance with physician recommendations in moderate- and high risk assessed patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:774.
Pollak JS, Rosenblatt M, Burdge C, Aruny J, Denbow N, Wysoki M. The interventional radiology clinic: changing practice patterns. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12(suppl):S66.
Obele CC, et al. What patients think about their interventional radiologists: assessment using a leading physician ratings website. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5):609–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.10.013.
Dodd GD, Allen B, Birzniekc D, et al. Reengineering the radiology enterprise: a summary of the 2014 Intersociety Committee Summer Conference. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12:228–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.022.
Shay W, et al. The effect of radiologist assistants in an interventional radiology department. Radiol Technol. 2017;88(3):333–8.
Woods L. What works: scheduling—picture perfect solution. Health Manag Technol. 2001;22:48–50.
Mozumdar BC, Hornsby DN, Gogate AS, et al. Radiology scheduling: preferences of users of radiologic services and impact on referral base and extension. Acad Radiol. 2003;10:908–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00002-3.
Villarreal MC, et al. Improving procedure start times and decreasing delays in interventional radiology: a department’s quality improvement initiative. Acad Radiol. 2015;22(12):1579–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.08.008.
Goodman BS, et al. Improving the efficiency of an interventional radiology consultation service. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(3):S60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2013.12.150.
Abujudeh H, et al. Key principles in quality and safety in radiology. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(3):W101–9. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.07.014.
Specht K, Abujudeh H, Salazar GM. Qualitative analysis of patients’ complaints and their resolution in interventional radiology (IR): 12-year experience at an academic medical center. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;3(25):S101–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2013.12.284.
Wachter RM. How measurement fails doctors and teachers. New York Times website. www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/opinion/Sunday/how-measurement-fails-doctors-and-teachers.html?_r = 0. Accessed 1 Apr 2016.
Abujudeh HH, Danielson A, Bruno MA. A patient-centered radiology quality process map: opportunities and solutions. Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207(5):940–6.
Salazar GM, Burk KS, Abujudeh H. Patient complaints in image-guided interventions: evaluation of multifactorial issues using a coding taxonomy. Am J Roentgenol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.17.19104.
Ripley BA, Tiffany D, Lehmann LS, Silverman SG. Improving the informed consent conversation: a standardized checklist that is patient centered, quality driven, and legally sound. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26:1639–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2015.06.007.
Qureshi AI, Gilani S, Adil MM, et al. Pattern of informed consent acquisition in patients undergoing emergent endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2014;7:21–5.
Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA. Ex-ecutive summary. In: Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004. p. 1–18.
Bass PF, Wilson JF, Griffith CH, Barnett DR. Residents’ ability to identify patients with poor literacy skills. Acad Med. 2002;77:1039–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002350.
Parikh NS, Parker RM, Nurss JR, Baker DW, Williams MV. Shame and health literacy: the unspoken connection. Patient Educ Couns. 1996;27:33–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-3991(95)00787-3.
Bernat JL, Peterson LM. Patient-centered in-formed consent in surgical practice. Arch Surg. 2006;141:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.1.86.
ACR–SIR–SPR practice parameter on informed consent for image-guided procedures. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/InformedConsent-ImagGuided.pdf.
Pass SE, Simpson RW. Discontinuation and reinstitution of medications during the perioperative period. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61(9):899–912.
• Taslakian B, Sebaaly MG, Al-Kutoubi A. Patient evaluation and preparation in vascular and interventional radiology: what every interventional radiologist should know (part 2: patient preparation and medications). Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2016;39(4):489–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1239-4. Important source for evidence based strategies that improve quality of patient care before the interventional procedure.
American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(3):495–511. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e3181fcbfd9.
American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation, Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002;96(4):1004–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000002043.
Moran TC, Kaye AD, Mai AH, Bok LR. Sedation, analgesia, and local anesthesia: a review for general and interventional radiologists. Radiographics. 2013;33(2):E47–60. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.332125012.
American College of Radiology. ACR manual on contrast media. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2018.07.030.
Pucelikova T, Dangas G, Mehran R. Contrast-induced nephropathy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;71(1):62–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21207.
Davenport MS, Cohan RH, Ellis JH. Contrast media controversiesin 2015: imaging patients with renal impairment or risk of contrast reaction. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(6):1174–81. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.14.14259.
Katzberg RW, Newhouse JH. Intravenous contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity: is the medical risk really as great as we have come to believe? Radiology. 2010;256(1):21–8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.1009200.
Gleeson TG, Bulugahapitiya S. Contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(6):1673–89. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831673.
Andreucci M, Solomon R, Tasanarong A. Side effects of radiographic contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors, and prevention. BioMed Res Int. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/741018.741018.
Andreucci M, et al. Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy through a knowledge of its pathogenesis and risk factors. Sci World J. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/823169.
Ball T, McCullough PA. Statins for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2014;127(1-4):165–71. https://doi.org/10.1159/000363202.
Solomon RJ, Natarajan MK, Doucet S, Sharma SK, Staniloae CS, Katholi RE, Gelormini JL, Labinaz M, Moreyra AE. Cardiac angiography in renally impaired patients (CARE) study: a randomized double-blind trial of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease. Circulation. 2007;115(25):3189–96. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.671644.
Bush WH Jr, Krecke KN, King BF Jr, et al. Radiology life support. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.08.1542.
Mueller PR, Biswal S, Halpern EF, Kaufman JA, Lee MJ. Interventional radiologic procedures: patient anxiety, perception or pain, understanding of procedure, and satisfaction with medication—a prospective study. Radiology. 2000;215:684–8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn33684.
•• Patel IJ, et al. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:727. Imporant guidelines for anti-coagulation before interventional procedures.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Dr. Ali N. Harb for reviewing their manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Hani Abujudeh is a section editor for Current Radiology Reports. Tarek Jazmati, Vishnu Chandra, and Sohail Contractor each declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical collection on Quality and Safety.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jazmati, T., Chandra, V., Contractor, S. et al. Quality Assurance in Interventional Radiology: Preprocedural Care. Curr Radiol Rep 7, 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-019-0309-9
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-019-0309-9