Abstract
Purpose of Review
The investigation of shoulder pain usually includes diagnostic imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most widely used imaging tools. Although MRI has good diagnostic accuracy, pitfalls, anatomical variations, or artifacts in MRI can lead to a false diagnosis or raise concern over findings that do not have clinical significance. This knowledge is important to all radiologists but especially so for the less experienced since it can improve reports, avoiding mistakes that could lead to inappropriate diagnosis and treatment.
Recent Findings
The authors demonstrate with didactic cases and images the most common findings that can simulate injuries. This pictorial essay includes cases of pitfalls, anatomical variations, or artifacts in MRI that simulate pathology of bone and cartilage, glenoid labrum, muscles, tendons (especially the rotator cuff and long head of the biceps brachii), and ligaments.
Summary
Pitfalls, anatomical variations, or artifacts in MRI can lead to a false diagnosis or raise concern over findings that do not have clinical significance. This knowledge is important to all radiologists but especially so for the less experienced since it can improve reports, avoiding mistakes that could lead to inappropriate diagnosis and treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
•• Rudez J, Zanetti M. Normal anatomy, variants and pitfalls on shoulder MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68(1):25–35. Excellent review on normal anatomy, variants and pitfalls on shoulder MRI.
Mellado JM, Calmet J, Domenech S, Sauri A. Clinically significant skeletal variations of the shoulder and the wrist: role of MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(7):1735–43.
Fitzpatrick D, Walz DM. Shoulder MR imaging normal variants and imaging artifacts. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2010;18(4):615–32.
• Zember JS, Rosenberg ZS, Kwong S, Kothary SP, Bedoya MA. Normal skeletal maturation and imaging pitfalls in the pediatric shoulder. Radiographics. 2015;35(4):1108–22. Great review of pediatric normal shoulder maturation and imaging pitfalls.
•• Bencardino JT, Beltran LS. Pain related to rotator cuff abnormalities: MRI findings without clinical significance. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31(6):1286–99. Excellent article on findings without clinical significance.
Farley TE, Neumann CH, Steinbach LS, Petersen SA. The coracoacromial arch: MR evaluation and correlation with rotator cuff pathology. Skeletal Radiol. 1994;23(8):641–5.
Kaplan PA, Bryans KC, Davick JP, Otte M, Stinson WW, Dussault RG. MR imaging of the normal shoulder: variants and pitfalls. Radiology. 1992;184(2):519–24.
Richards RD, Sartoris DJ, Pathria MN, Resnick D. Hill-Sachs lesion and normal humeral groove: MR imaging features allowing their differentiation. Radiology. 1994;190(3):665–8.
Robinson G, Ho Y, Finlay K, Friedman L, Harish S. Normal anatomy and common labral lesions at MR arthrography of the shoulder. Clin Radiol. 2006;61(10):805–21.
Buck FM, Grehn H, Hilbe M, Pfirrmann CW, Manzanell S, Hodler J. Magnetic resonance histologic correlation in rotator cuff tendons. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;32(1):165–72.
Liou JT, Wilson AJ, Totty WG, Brown JJ. The normal shoulder: common variations that simulate pathologic conditions at MR imaging. Radiology. 1993;186(2):435–41.
Zubler C, Mengiardi B, Schmid MR, Hodler J, Jost B, Pfirrmann CW. MR arthrography in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: diagnostic performance and pitfalls. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(6):1603–10.
Macarini L, Muscarella S, Lelario M, Stoppino L, Scalzo G, Scelzi A, et al. Rotator cable at MR imaging: considerations on morphological aspects and biomechanical role. Radiol Med. 2011;116(1):102–13.
Moser TP, Cardinal E, Bureau NJ, Guillin R, Lanneville P, Grabs D. The aponeurotic expansion of the supraspinatus tendon: anatomy and prevalence in a series of 150 shoulder MRIs. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44(2):223–31.
Massengill AD, Seeger LL, Yao L, Gentili A, Shnier RC, Shapiro MS, et al. Labrocapsular ligamentous complex of the shoulder: normal anatomy, anatomic variation, and pitfalls of MR imaging and MR arthrography. Radiographics. 1994;14(6):1211–23.
Palmer WE, Caslowitz PL, Chew FS. MR arthrography of the shoulder: normal intraarticular structures and common abnormalities. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164(1):141–6.
Loredo R, Longo C, Salonen D, Yu J, Haghighi P, Trudell D, et al. Glenoid labrum: MR imaging with histologic correlation. Radiology. 1995;196(1):33–41.
Lin E. Magnetic resonance arthrography of superior labrum anterior-posterior lesions: a practical approach to interpretation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2009;38(2):91–7.
Park YH, Lee JY, Moon SH, Mo JH, Yang BK, Hahn SH, et al. MR arthrography of the labral capsular ligamentous complex in the shoulder: imaging variations and pitfalls. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(3):667–72.
Sasaki T, Yodono H, Prado GL, Saito Y, Miura H, Itabashi Y, et al. Increased signal intensity in the normal glenoid labrum in MR imaging: diagnostic pitfalls caused by the magic-angle effect. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2002;1(3):149–56.
Tirman PF, Stauffer AE, Crues JV 3rd, Turner RM, Nottage WM, Schobert WE, et al. Saline magnetic resonance arthrography in the evaluation of glenohumeral instability. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(5):550–9.
De Maeseneer M, Van Roy P, Shahabpour M. Normal MR imaging anatomy of the rotator cuff tendons, glenoid fossa, labrum, and ligaments of the shoulder. Radiol Clin North Am. 2006;44(4):479–87.
Williams MM, Snyder SJ, Buford D Jr. The Buford complex—the “cord-like” middle glenohumeral ligament and absent anterosuperior labrum complex: a normal anatomic capsulolabral variant. Arthroscopy. 1994;10(3):241–7.
Palmer WE, Brown JH, Rosenthal DI. Labral-ligamentous complex of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology. 1994;190(3):645–51.
De Maeseneer M, Van Roy F, Lenchik L, Shahabpour M, Jacobson J, Ryu KN, et al. CT and MR arthrography of the normal and pathologic anterosuperior labrum and labral-bicipital complex. Radiographics. 2000;20:S67–81.
Kwak SM, Brown RR, Resnick D, Trudell D, Applegate GR, Haghighi P. Anatomy, anatomic variations, and pathology of the 11- to 3-o’clock position of the glenoid labrum: findings on MR arthrography and anatomic sections. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(1):235–8.
Kreitner KF, Botchen K, Rude J, Bittinger F, Krummenauer F, Thelen M. Superior labrum and labral-bicipital complex: MR imaging with pathologic-anatomic and histologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(3):599–605.
Smith DK, Chopp TM, Aufdemorte TB, Witkowski EG, Jones RC. Sublabral recess of the superior glenoid labrum: study of cadavers with conventional nonenhanced MR imaging, MR arthrography, anatomic dissection, and limited histologic examination. Radiology. 1996;201(1):251–6.
Chang D, Mohana-Borges A, Borso M, Chung CB. SLAP lesions: anatomy, clinical presentation, MR imaging diagnosis and characterization. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68(1):72–87.
Willemsen UF, Wiedemann E, Brunner U, Scheck R, Pfluger T, Kueffer G, et al. Prospective evaluation of MR arthrography performed with high-volume intraarticular saline enhancement in patients with recurrent anterior dislocations of the shoulder. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(1):79–84.
Mohana-Borges AV, Chung CB, Resnick D. Superior labral anteroposterior tear: classification and diagnosis on MRI and MR arthrography. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(6):1449–62.
Tuite MJ, Blankenbaker DG, Seifert M, Ziegert AJ, Orwin JF. Sublabral foramen and Buford complex: inferior extent of the unattached or absent labrum in 50 patients. Radiology. 2002;223(1):137–42.
Beltran J, Bencardino J, Mellado J, Rosenberg ZS, Irish RD. MR arthrography of the shoulder: variants and pitfalls. Radiographics. 1997;17(6):1403–12 Discussion 12–15.
Tuite MJ, Orwin JF. Anterosuperior labral variants of the shoulder: appearance on gradient-recalled-echo and fast spin-echo MR images. Radiology. 1996;199(2):537–40.
Tirman PF, Feller JF, Palmer WE, Carroll KW, Steinbach LS, Cox I. The Buford complex—a variation of normal shoulder anatomy: MR arthrographic imaging features. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166(4):869–73.
Del Rey FC, Vazquez DG, Lopez DN. Glenohumeral instability associated with Buford complex. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(12):1489–92.
Steinbach LS. MRI of shoulder instability. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68(1):57–71.
Neumann CH, Petersen SA, Jahnke AH. MR imaging of the labral-capsular complex: normal variations. Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157(5):1015–21.
Coumas JM, Waite RJ, Goss TP, Ferrari DA, Kanzaria PK, Pappas AM. CT and MR evaluation of the labral capsular ligamentous complex of the shoulder. Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158(3):591–7.
Novak LM, Lee JK, Saleem AM. Synovial fold of the posterior shoulder joint capsule. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38(5):493–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
André Yui Aihara, Paola Cecy Kuenzer Goes, Fabiano Nassar Cardoso, and Artur da Rocha Correa Fernandes each declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Musculoskeletal Imaging.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aihara, A.Y., Goes, P.C.K., Cardoso, F.N. et al. Anatomical Variants and Pitfalls in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Shoulder that can Simulate Pathology. Curr Radiol Rep 5, 41 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-017-0235-7
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-017-0235-7