Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimal Timing and Methodology of Umbilical Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants: a Review

  • Neonatology (C Juliano, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Pediatrics Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

We examine current recommendations for the timing of umbilical cord clamping in term and preterm infants and review available literature in support of these recommendations. Additionally, we explore potential barriers to practice change and identify opportunities for ongoing research.

Recent Findings

Available literature supports the practice of delayed cord clamping (DCC) in neonates, with clear benefits over immediate cord clamping (ICC) when comparing both short- and longer-term outcomes. Additional studies suggest similar benefits may be conferred by the practice of umbilical cord milking (UCM). Despite recommendation updates, significant variability in practice surrounding the timing of umbilical cord clamping persists.

Summary

DCC and UCM show definite advantages over ICC. Perceived risks associated with either practice may lead to decreased adherence to current practice recommendations. Additional studies comparing these two practices are warranted and might help to further delineate best practice guidelines or potentially identify populations better suited to one method vs the other. Further education regarding the benefits of DCC and UCM are needed to improve recommendation adherence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Push, pull, squeeze, clamp: 100 years of changes in the management of the third stage of labour as described by ten teachers. BMJ. 2012;345:e8270. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e8270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yao AC, Moinian M, Lind J. Distribution of blood between infant and placenta after birth. Lancet. 1969;2(7626):871–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Linderkamp O. Placental transfusion: determinants and effects. Clin Perinatol. 1982;9(3):559–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McDonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, Morris PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11(7).

  5. Rabe H, Diaz-Rossello JL, Duley L, Dowswell T. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8:CD003248. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003248.pub3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. • Delayed umbilical cord clamping after birth. Pediatrics. 2017;139(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-0957. Reflects current professional organization recommendations.

  7. • Committee on Obstetric P. Committee Opinion No. 684: Delayed umbilical cord clamping after birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(1):e5-e10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001860. Reflects current professional organization recommendations.

  8. • Guideline: delayed umbilical cord clamping for improved maternal and infant health and nutrition outcomes. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Geneva2014. Reflects current professional organization recommendations.

  9. Guidelines on basic newborn resuscitation. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Geneva2012.

  10. WHO Recommendations for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Geneva2012.

  11. Jelin AC, Kuppermann M, Erickson K, Clyman R, Schulkin J. Obstetricians’ attitudes and beliefs regarding umbilical cord clamping. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(14):1457–61. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.864275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yao AC, Hirvensalo M, Lind J. Placental transfusion-rate and uterine contraction. Lancet. 1968;1(7539):380–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Farrar D, Airey R, Law GR, Tuffnell D, Cattle B, Duley L. Measuring placental transfusion for term births: weighing babies with cord intact. BJOG. 2011;118(1):70–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02781.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McDonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, Morris PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD004074. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004074.pub3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Katheria AC, Leone TA, Woelkers D, Garey DM, Rich W, Finer NN. The effects of umbilical cord milking on hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes in premature neonates. J Pediatr. 2014;164(5):1045–50 e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Katheria AC, Lakshminrusimha S, Rabe H, McAdams R, Mercer JS. Placental transfusion: a review. J Perinatol. 2017;37(2):105–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vain NE, Satragno DS, Gorenstein AN, Gordillo JE, Berazategui JP, Alda MG, et al. Effect of gravity on volume of placental transfusion: a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9939):235–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60197-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boere I, Roest AA, Wallace E, Ten Harkel AD, Haak MC, Morley CJ, et al. Umbilical blood flow patterns directly after birth before delayed cord clamping. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(2):F121–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-307144.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Philip AG, Teng SS. Role of respiration in effecting transfusion at cesarean section. Biol Neonate. 1977;31(3–4):219–24. https://doi.org/10.1159/000240963.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yao AC, Lind J. Effect of gravity on placental transfusion. Lancet. 1969;2(7619):505–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhatt S, Alison BJ, Wallace EM, Crossley KJ, Gill AW, Kluckow M, et al. Delaying cord clamping until ventilation onset improves cardiovascular function at birth in preterm lambs. J Physiol. 2013;591(8):2113–26. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.250084.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lio A, Aurilia C, Zahra V, Moss TJ, LaRosa DA, Hooper SB, et al. Ventilation prior to umbilical cord clamping improves cardiovascular stability and oxygenation in preterm lambs after exposure to intrauterine inflammation. Front Pediatr. 2018;6:286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kluckow M, Hooper SB. Using physiology to guide time to cord clamping. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;20(4):225–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2015.03.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Niermeyer S, Velaphi S. Promoting physiologic transition at birth: re-examining resuscitation and the timing of cord clamping. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;18(6):385–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2013.08.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. • Brouwer E, Knol R, Vernooij ASN, van den Akker T, Vlasman PE, Klumper F, et al. Physiological-based cord clamping in preterm infants using a new purpose-built resuscitation table: a feasibility study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-315483 Shows the rationale and feasibility for physiology based cord clamping practices.

  26. • Katheria A, Poeltler D, Durham J, Steen J, Rich W, Arnell K, et al. Neonatal Resuscitation with an intact cord: a randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr. 2016;178:75–80 e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.07.053 Shows the feasibility of initiating resuscitation with an intact cord.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. • Katheria AC, Brown MK, Faksh A, Hassen KO, Rich W, Lazarus D, et al. Delayed cord clamping in newborns born at term at risk for resuscitation: a feasibility randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr. 2017;187:313–7 e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.04.033 Shows the feasibility of initiating resuscitation with an intact cord.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. • Blank DA, Badurdeen S, Omar FKC, Jacobs SE, Thio M, Dawson JA, et al. Baby-directed umbilical cord clamping: a feasibility study. Resuscitation. 2018;131:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.07.020 Shows the rationale and feasibility for physiology based cord clamping practices.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yadav AK, Upadhyay A, Gothwal S, Dubey K, Mandal U, Yadav CP. Comparison of three types of intervention to enhance placental redistribution in term newborns: randomized control trial. J Perinatol. 2015;35(9):720–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bora R, Akhtar SS, Venkatasubramaniam A, Wolfson J, Rao R. Effect of 40-cm segment umbilical cord milking on hemoglobin and serum ferritin at 6 months of age in full-term infants of anemic and non-anemic mothers. J Perinatol. 2015;35(10):832–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hosono S, Mugishima H, Takahashi S, Takahashi S, Masaoka N, Yamamoto T, et al. One-time umbilical cord milking after cord cutting has same effectiveness as multiple-time umbilical cord milking in infants born at <29 weeks of gestation: a retrospective study. J Perinatol. 2015;35(8):590–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar B, Upadhyay A, Gothwal S, Jaiswal V, Joshi P, Dubey K. Umbilical cord milking and hematological parameters in moderate to late preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52(9):753–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jaiswal P, Upadhyay A, Gothwal S, Chaudhary H, Tandon A. Comparison of umbilical cord milking and delayed cord clamping on cerebral blood flow in term neonates. Indian J Pediatr. 2015;82(10):890–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-015-1734-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rabe H, Jewison A, Alvarez RF, Crook D, Stilton D, Bradley R, et al. Milking compared with delayed cord clamping to increase placental transfusion in preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(2 Pt 1):205–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fe46ff.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McAdams RM, Fay E, Delaney S. Whole blood volumes associated with milking intact and cut umbilical cords in term newborns. J Perinatol. 2018;38(3):245–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-017-0002-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hosono S, Hine K, Nagano N, Taguchi Y, Yoshikawa K, Okada T, et al. Residual blood volume in the umbilical cord of extremely premature infants. Pediatr Int. 2015;57(1):68–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.12464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rudolph AM. Distribution and regulation of blood flow in the fetal and neonatal lamb. Circ Res. 1985;57(6):811–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Edelstone DI, Rudolph AM. Preferential streaming of ductus venosus blood to the brain and heart in fetal lambs. Am J Phys. 1979;237(6):H724–9. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1979.237.6.H724.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gao Y, Raj JU. Regulation of the pulmonary circulation in the fetus and newborn. Physiol Rev. 2010;90(4):1291–335. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00032.2009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wladimiroff JW, McGhie J. Ultrasonic assessment of cardiovascular geometry and function in the human fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981;88(9):870–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Garbrecht MR, Klein JM, Schmidt TJ, Snyder JM. Glucocorticoid metabolism in the human fetal lung: implications for lung development and the pulmonary surfactant system. Biol Neonate. 2006;89(2):109–19. https://doi.org/10.1159/000088653.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bland RD, Hansen TN, Haberkern CM, Bressack MA, Hazinski TA, Raj JU, et al. Lung fluid balance in lambs before and after birth. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982;53(4):992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1982.53.4.992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bland RD, Nielson DW. Developmental changes in lung epithelial ion transport and liquid movement. Annu Rev Physiol. 1992;54:373–94. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.54.030192.002105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hooper SB, Kitchen MJ, Wallace MJ, Yagi N, Uesugi K, Morgan MJ, et al. Imaging lung aeration and lung liquid clearance at birth. FASEB J. 2007;21(12):3329–37. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-8208com.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kitchen MJ, Lewis RA, Morgan MJ, Wallace MJ, Siew ML, Siu KK, et al. Dynamic measures of regional lung air volume using phase contrast x-ray imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(21):6065–77. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/21/012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dawson JA, Kamlin CO, Vento M, Wong C, Cole TJ, Donath SM, et al. Defining the reference range for oxygen saturation for infants after birth. Pediatrics. 2010;125(6):e1340–7. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-1510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Swanson JR, Sinkin RA. Transition from fetus to newborn. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2015;62(2):329–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2014.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ceriani Cernadas JM, Carroli G, Pellegrini L, Otano L, Ferreira M, Ricci C, et al. The effect of timing of cord clamping on neonatal venous hematocrit values and clinical outcome at term: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2006;117(4):e779–86. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Chen X, Li X, Chang Y, Li W, Cui H. Effect and safety of timing of cord clamping on neonatal hematocrit values and clinical outcomes in term infants: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2018;38(3):251–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-017-0001-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hutton EK, Hassan ES. Late vs early clamping of the umbilical cord in full-term neonates: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. JAMA. 2007;297(11):1241–52. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.11.1241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mercer JS, Erickson-Owens DA, Collins J, Barcelos MO, Parker AB, Padbury JF. Effects of delayed cord clamping on residual placental blood volume, hemoglobin and bilirubin levels in term infants: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2017;37(3):260–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kc A, Rana N, Malqvist M, Jarawka Ranneberg L, Subedi K, Andersson O. Effects of delayed umbilical cord clamping vs early clamping on anemia in infants at 8 and 12 months: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(3):264–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. • Fogarty M, Osborn DA, Askie L, Seidler AL, Hunter K, Lui K, et al. Delayed vs early umbilical cord clamping for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.231 Adds to the recent body of literature evaluating the safety and efficacy of DCC in preterm infants.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Strauss RG, Mock DM, Johnson KJ, Cress GA, Burmeister LF, Zimmerman MB, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing immediate versus delayed clamping of the umbilical cord in preterm infants: short-term clinical and laboratory endpoints. Transfusion. 2008;48(4):658–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01589.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. • Rana A, Agarwal K, Ramji S, Gandhi G, Sahu L. Safety of delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm neonates of less than 34 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018;61(6):655–61. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2018.61.6.655 Adds to the recent body of literature evaluating the safety and efficacy of DCC in preterm infants.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. • Chiruvolu A, Qin H, Nguyen ET, Inzer RW. The effect of delayed cord clamping on moderate and early late-preterm infants. Am J Perinatol. 2018;35(3):286–91. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1607222 Adds to the recent body of literature evaluating the safety and efficacy of DCC in preterm infants.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Rabe H, Reynolds G, Diaz-Rossello J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of a brief delay in clamping the umbilical cord of preterm infants. Neonatology. 2008;93(2):138–44. https://doi.org/10.1159/000108764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. • Garg BD, Kabra NS, Bansal A. Role of delayed cord clamping in prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(1):164–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1370704 Adds to the recent body of literature evaluating the safety and efficacy of DCC in preterm infants.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Mercer JS, Vohr BR, McGrath MM, Padbury JF, Wallach M, Oh W. Delayed cord clamping in very preterm infants reduces the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage and late-onset sepsis: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2006;117(4):1235–42. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1706.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. • Rabe H, Reynolds G, Diaz-Rossello J. Early versus delayed umbilical cord claping in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2004;18(4). Adds to the recent body of literature evaluating the safety and efficacy of DCC in preterm infants. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003248.pub2.

  61. • Chiruvolu A, Tolia VN, Qin H, Stone GL, Rich D, Conant RJ, et al. Effect of delayed cord clamping on very preterm infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(5):676 e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.016 Adds to the recent body of literature evaluating the safety and efficacy of DCC in preterm infants.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. • Backes CH, Rivera BK, Haque U, Bridge JA, Smith CV, Hutchon DJ, et al. Placental transfusion strategies in very preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(1):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000324 Adds to the recent body of literature evaluating the safety and efficacy of DCC in preterm infants.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. • Jelin AC, Zlatnik MG, Kuppermann M, Gregorich SE, Nakagawa S, Clyman R. Clamp late and maintain perfusion (CLAMP) policy: delayed cord clamping in preterm infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(11):1705–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1061496 Adds to the recent body of literature evaluating the safety and efficacy of DCC in preterm infants.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Hooper SB, Te Pas AB, Lang J, van Vonderen JJ, Roehr CC, Kluckow M, et al. Cardiovascular transition at birth: a physiological sequence. Pediatr Res. 2015;77(5):608–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2015.21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Polglase GR, Blank DA, Barton SK, Miller SL, Stojanovska V, Kluckow M, et al. Physiologically based cord clamping stabilises cardiac output and reduces cerebrovascular injury in asphyxiated near-term lambs. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(6):F530–F8. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313657.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Andersson O, Hellstrom-Westas L, Andersson D, Domellof M. Effect of delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping on neonatal outcomes and iron status at 4 months: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;343:d7157. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Andersson O, Domellof M, Andersson D, Hellstrom-Westas L. Effect of delayed vs early umbilical cord clamping on iron status and neurodevelopment at age 12 months: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(6):547–54. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. • Andersson O, Lindquist B, Lindgren M, Stjernqvist K, Domellof M, Hellstrom-Westas L. effect of delayed cord clamping on neurodevelopment at 4 years of age: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(7):631–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0358 Investigates the long-term outcome differences between ICC and DCC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. • Mercer JS, Erickson-Owens DA, Deoni SCL, Dean DC 3rd, Collins J, Parker AB, et al. Effects of delayed cord clamping on 4-month ferritin levels, brain myelin content, and neurodevelopment: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2018;203:266–72 e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.06.006 Investigates the long-term outcome differences between ICC and DCC.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. • Rana N, Kc A, Malqvist M, Subedi K, Andersson O. Effect of delayed cord clamping of term babies on neurodevelopment at 12 months: a randomized controlled trial. Neonatology. 2019;115(1):36–42. https://doi.org/10.1159/000491994 Investigates the long-term outcome differences between ICC and DCC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. • Mercer JS, Erickson-Owens DA, Vohr BR, Tucker RJ, Parker AB, Oh W, et al. Effects of placental transfusion on neonatal and 18 month outcomes in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2016;168:50–5 e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.09.068 Investigates the long-term outcome differences between ICC and DCC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Chopra A, Thakur A, Garg P, Kler N, Gujral K. Early versus delayed cord clamping in small for gestational age infants and iron stores at 3 months of age - a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1214-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Vural I, Ozdemir H, Teker G, Yoldemir T, Bilgen H, Ozek E. Delayed cord clamping in term large-for-gestational age infants: a prospective randomised study. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14242.

  74. • Ruangkit C, Bumrungphuet S, Panburana P, Khositseth A, Nuntnarumit P. A randomized controlled trial of immediate versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in multiple-birth infants born preterm. Neonatology. 2018;115(2):156–63. https://doi.org/10.1159/000494132 Highlights the importance of differentiating between singleton and multiple gestation pregnancies.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Perlman JM, Wyllie J, Kattwinkel J, Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Guinsburg R, et al. Part 7: neonatal resuscitation: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations (Reprint). Pediatrics. 2015;136(Suppl 2):S120–66. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3373D.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Duley. Clamping of the umbilical cord and placental transfusion. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2015. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/scientific-impact-papers/sip-14.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2019.

  77. Sawyer T, Umoren RA, Gray MM. Neonatal resuscitation: advances in training and practice. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:11–9. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S109099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Leslie MS, Greene J, Schulkin J, Jelin AC. Umbilical cord clamping practices of U.S. obstetricians. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;11(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.3233/NPM-181729.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Anton O, Jordan H, Rabe H. Strategies for implementing placental transfusion at birth: a systematic review. Birth. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12398.

  80. Al-Wassia H, Shah PS. Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord milking at birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(1):18–25. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Li J, Yu B, Wang W, Luo D, Dai QL, Gan XQ. Does intact umbilical cord milking increase infection rates in preterm infants with premature prolonged rupture of membranes? The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet 2018:1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1487947.

  82. • Girish M, Jain V, Dhokane R, Gondhali SB, Vaidya A, Aghai ZH. Umbilical cord milking for neonates who are depressed at birth: a randomized trial of feasibility. J Perinatol. 2018;38(9):1190–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0161-4 Shows the feasibility of resuscitating without a delay during UCM.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Katheria A, Blank D, Rich W, Finer N. Umbilical cord milking improves transition in premature infants at birth. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94085. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094085.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Katheria AC, Truong G, Cousins L, Oshiro B, Finer NN. Umbilical cord milking versus delayed cord clamping in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2015;136(1):61–9. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-0368.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. • Nagano N, Saito M, Sugiura T, Miyahara F, Namba F, Ota E. Benefits of umbilical cord milking versus delayed cord clamping on neonatal outcomes in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0201528. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201528 Investigates the long-term outcome differences between DCC and UCM.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Kilicdag H, Gulcan H, Hanta D, Torer B, Gokmen Z, Ozdemir SI, et al. Is umbilical cord milking always an advantage? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(4):615–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1012067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. New York University School of Medicine, 317 East 34th Street, Suite 902, New York, NY, 10016, USA

    Sweta Bhargava, Xuxin Chen, Heather Howell & Purnahamsi Desai

Authors
  1. Sweta Bhargava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xuxin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Heather Howell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Purnahamsi Desai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Purnahamsi Desai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhargava, S., Chen, X., Howell, H. et al. Optimal Timing and Methodology of Umbilical Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants: a Review. Curr Pediatr Rep 7, 90–98 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-019-00197-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-019-00197-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation