Characterization of Settled Particles of the Red Mud Waste Exposed to Different Aqueous Environmental Conditions

Original Paper
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

Red mud waste is generally transferred to the storage area in a slurry form with solids content varying from 15 to 40%. Due to arise of a variety of environmental and climatic conditions in the due course of time, settling behaviour of particles as well as properties of settled particles changes. Thus, understanding of the settling behaviour of waste particles becomes essential after disposing the waste into the pond. In addition, studies related to the settling behaviour of particles become important during the extraction of alumina from bauxite ore (i.e. in settlers). In the present study, efforts are made to investigate the settling behaviour of red mud waste particles when exposed to different aqueous environmental conditions. For testing purpose, a series of differential free swell tests were conducted considering aqueous environmental conditions such as tap water, distilled water, kerosene, NaCl solutions of 1.71 and 3.42 M, and HCl solutions with a pH range from 1 to 4, respectively. In addition, efforts are also devoted to characterizing the post-exposed sediment samples to ascertain possible changes in the mineralogical, morphological, and elemental compositions of the particles. Results reveal that aqueous environment has a considerable effect on the settling behaviour of particles, while the effect of pH found to be trivial. The analyses of characterization studies disclose a marginal to considerable changes in elemental, phase compositions and morphological characteristics of the post exposed particles.

Keywords

Red mud waste Settling behaviour Aqueous environment Mineralogical–morphological–elemental compositions Dispersion and flocculation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are highly thankful to Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB)-Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, for the financial support (Grant No.: SB/FTP/ETA-0297/2013) to carrying out this research work. The help is greatly acknowledged by the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Sridharan A, Prakash K (2001) Settling behaviour and clay mineralogy. Soils Found 41(2):105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li LY (1998) Properties of red mud tailings produced under varying process conditions. J Environ Eng 124(3):254–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tombácz E, Szekeres M (2006) Surface charge heterogeneity of kaolinite in aqueous suspension in comparison with montmorillonite. Appl Clay Sci 34:105–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaya A, Oren AH, Yükselen Y (2006) Settling of kaolinite in different aqueous environment. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 24(3):203–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Orban F, Pinter T, Sigmond G, Siklosi P, Solymar K, Toth P, Zambo J (1973) Processing of bauxites containing goethite. Hung Teljes 6:758Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Villar LFS, Campos TMP, Azevedo RF, Zornberg JG (2009) Influence of laboratory techniques on the geotechnical characterization of mining and industrial wastes. In: 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Alexandria, Egypt, pp 186–189Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deventer BBGV, Usher SP, Kumar A, Rudman M, Scales PJ (2011) Aggregate densification and batch settling. Chem Eng J 171:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parekh BK, Goldberger WM (1976) An assessment of technology for possible utilization of bayer process muds. USEPA-600/2-76-30.1:154Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li LY, Rutherford GK (1996) Effect of bauxite properties on the settling of red mud. Int J Miner Process 48:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Newson T, Dyer T, Adam C, Sharp S (2006) Effect of structure on the geotechnical properties of bauxite residue. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(2):143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Snars K, Gilkes RJ (2009) Evaluation of bauxite residues (red muds) of different origins for environmental applications. Appl Clay Sci 46:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davis CE (1973) The mineralogy of Jamaican bauxites. In: The Journal of Geological Society of Jamaica, proceedings of bauxite symposium, vol II, pp 6–20Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krizek RJ (2004) Slurries in geotechnical engineering. The Twelfth Spencer J. Buchanan Lecture, Texas A&M University, Texas, p 75Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ruyters S, Mertens J, Vassilieva E, Dehandschutter B, Poffijin A, Smolders E (2011) The red mud accident in Ajka (Hungary): plant toxicity and trace metal bioavailability in red mud contaminated soil. Environ Sci Technol 45(4):1616–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gomes HI, Mayes WM, Rogerson M, Stewart DI, Burke IT (2016) Alkaline residues and the environment: a review of impacts, management practices and opportunities. J Clean Prod 112(4):3571–3582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gräfe M, Power G, Klauber C (2011) Bauxite residue issues: III Alkalinity and associated chemistry. Hydrometallurgy 108(1–2):60–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rao BH, Reddy NG (2017) Zeta potential and particle size characteristics of red mud waste, chapter-8. In: Babu GLS et al (eds) Geoenvironmental practices and sustainability, developments in geotechnical engineering. Springer, Singapore, pp 69–89Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rout SK, Sahoo S, Das SK (2012) Utility of red mud as an embankment material. Int J Earth Sci Eng 5(6):1645–1651Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sundaram R, Gupta S (2010) Construction of foundation on red mud. 6th international congress on environmental geotechnics, New Delhi, India, pp 1172–1175Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    IS: 2720-Part 26 (1987) Indian standard methods of test for soils: determination of pH value. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu Y, Naidu R, Ming H (2013) Surface electrochemical properties of red mud (bauxite residue): zeta potential and surface charge density. J Colloid Interface Sci 394:451–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kosmulski M (2002) The pH-dependent surface charging and the points of zero charge. J Colloid Interface Sci 253:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kosmulski M (2009) Compilation of PZC and IEP of sparingly soluble metal oxides and hydroxides from literature. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 152(1–2):14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chevdov D, Ostap S, Le T (2001) Surface properties of red mud particles from potentiometric titration. Colloids Surf A 182(1–3):131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang K, Ping H, Zhang L, Chen Q (2008) Surface charge properties of red mud particles generated from Chinese diaspore bauxite. Trans Nonferrous Met Soci China 18(5):1285–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    IS: 2720-Part 40 (1977) Indian standard methods of test for soils: determination of free swell index of soils. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nikraz HR, Bodley AJ, Cooling DJ, Kong PYL, Soomro M (2007) Comparison of physical properties between treated and untreated bauxite residue mud. J Mater Civ Eng 19(1):2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khaitan S, Dzombak D, Lowry GV (2009) Chemistry of the acid neutralization capacity of bauxite residue. Environ Eng Sci 26(5):873–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rai S, Wasewar KL, Lataye DH, Mukhopadhyay J, Yoo CK (2013) Feasibility of red mud neutralization with seawater using Taguchi’s methodology. Int J Environ Sci Technol 10(2):305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reddy NG, Rao BH (2016) Evaluation of the compaction characteristics of untreated and treated red mud. ASCE GSP 272:23–32Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Michaels AS, Bolger JC (1962) Settling rates and sediment volumes of flocculated kaolin suspensions. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 1:24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Das SK, Rout S, Alam S (2015) Characterization of red mud as a subgrade construction material. In: 3rd conference of transportation research group of India (3rd CTRG), Kolkata, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pecharsky V, Zavalij P (2009) Fundamentals of powder diffraction and structural characterization of materials, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wu F (2012) Aluminous goethite in the Bayer process and its impact on alumina recovery and settling. PhD dissertation, Curtin UniversityGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Soltani A, Estabragh AR (2015) Treatment of expansive soils with quality saline pore water by cyclic drying and wetting. Desert 20(1):73–82Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kim M, Kim S, Kim J, Kang S, Lee S (2013) Factors affecting flocculation performance of synthetic polymer for turbidity control. J Agric Chem Environ 2(1):16–21Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Li LY (2001) A study of iron mineral transformation to reduce red mud tailings. Waste Manag 21(6):525–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ostap S (1984) Effect of bauxite mineralogy on its processing characteristics. In: Jacob L Jr (eds) Bauxite, proceedings of bauxite symposium. Los Angeles, CA, pp 651–671Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Solymar K, Sajo I, Steiner J, Zoldi J (1992) Characteristics and separability of red mud. In: Proceedings of the 121st TMS annual meeting, San Diego, USA, pp 209–223Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cusack PB, Healy MG, Ryan PC, Burke IT, O’Donoghue LM, Ujaczki E, Ronan C (2018) Enhancement of bauxite residue as a low-cost adsorbent for phosphorus in aqueous solution, using seawater and gypsum treatments. J Clean Prod 179:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rai S, Wasewar KL, Lataye DH, Mishra RS, Puttewar SP, Chaddha MJ, Mahindiran P, Mukhopadhyay J (2012) Neutralization of red mud with pickling waste liquor using Taguchi’s design of experimental methodology. Waste Manag Res 30(9):922–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Reddy NG, Rao BH (2018) Compaction and consolidation behaviour of untreated and treated waste of Indian red mud. Geotech Res.  https://doi.org/10.1680/jgere.18.00005 Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cengeloglu Y, Kir E, Ersoz M (2002) Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by using red mud. Sep Purif Technol 28(1):81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Swain K, Mahamaya M, Alam S, Das SK (2018) Stabilization of dispersive soil using biopolymer. In: Singh D, Galaa A (eds) Contemporary issues in geoenvironmental engineering, GeoMEast 2017, sustainable civil infrastructures. Springer, Cham, pp 132–147Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rai S, Wasewar KL, Mukhopadhyay J, Yoo CK, Uslu H (2012) Neutralization and utilization of red mud for its better waste management. Arch Environ Sci 6:13–33Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ma P, Pierre AC (1997) Effect of interaction between clay particles and Fe3+ ions on colloidal properties of kaolinite suspensions. Clays Clay Miner 45(5):733–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Geotechnical Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of InfrastructureIIT BhubaneswarArgul, JataniIndia

Personalised recommendations