Using parent feedback: A qualitative study of residents’ and physician-educators’ perspectives
- 180 Downloads
Patients and family members can contribute to resident assessment in competency-based medical education. However, few studies have examined the use of patient/family member feedback generated from questionnaire-based assessments. To implement appropriate assessment strategies and optimize feedback use, we need to understand how residents and physician-educators would use feedback from these stakeholders. This study aimed to understand how paediatric residents and physician-educators would use parent feedback generated from questionnaire-based assessments.
This study was conducted at a paediatric academic health science centre. We held dyadic interviews with six residents and six physician-educators. A three-step approach was used to analyze the data: data reduction, data display, and conclusions/verifications. We developed an initial coding scheme, conducted an in-depth review of the data and coded it, finalized our coding scheme, and identified categories.
Participants described that they would use parent feedback to: (a) provide additional direct observations of residents’ performances, (b) teach and coach residents, (c) assess residents’ overall performance and progression, and (d) encourage resident self-assessment and behaviour change.
Parents directly observe residents as they interact with them and their children and, therefore, can provide feedback on residents’ performances. Residency programs should include parent feedback and promote and facilitate its use by residents and physician-educators.
This study provides an initial understanding of how paediatric residents and physician-educators would use parent feedback if they were to receive it. This information, combined with future research, can inform the development and implementation of parent feedback strategies in competency-based medical education.
KeywordsFeedback Medical education Parents Qualitative research
What this paper adds
Patients and their family members can make significant contributions to resident assessment, especially within competency-based medical education. However, few studies have examined residents’ and physician-educators’ use of feedback from these key stakeholders. It is important to understand feedback use in order to implement appropriate patient and family member assessment strategies that optimize use. This study provides insight into how paediatric residents and physician-educators would use parent feedback on residents’ skills and abilities generated from questionnaire-based assessments, ultimately informing their clinical practices and professional development.
Patients and family members can meaningfully assess residents’ professionalism, collaboration, interpersonal abilities, and communication skills [1, 2]. Their involvement in resident assessment is important given the prevalence of patient- and family-centred care in health contexts as well as its impact on healthcare quality and health outcomes . The Institute for Patient- and Family-Centered Care stresses that all aspects of professional practice should incorporate patient- and family-centred care, including medical education . Educators and researchers further emphasize these stakeholders’ roles in medical education and the need for leaners to learn with and from them [5, 6]. Efforts are underway to involve patients and family members in learner assessment , including, for example, the assessment of learners’ communication skills via questionnaires [8, 9, 10, 11]. However, research is needed to understand how residents and physician-educators would use the feedback generated from questionnaires to improve clinical practices.
As educators and researchers work to involve patients and family members in medical education, others are working to transition from time-based to competency-based medical education (CBME) . Of interest to this study, paediatrics residency programs in Canada are currently in the midst of transitioning to CBME  and therefore, educators and researchers are looking for new and innovative assessment strategies for residents . To effectively improve residents’ skills, direct observation of performance is the most accurate assessment method and allows for timely feedback [14, 15]. Performance-based assessment, especially through direct observation in clinical settings, is essential but not well studied amidst the above-mentioned curricular changes [16, 17].
For assessment to be effective, residents must utilize the feedback generated from it. Many factors can influence the use of feedback, such as its timing, understanding what to do with it, and one’s perceived need for and openness to receiving it [18, 19, 20]. Residents’ perceptions of the assessors’ credibility and the data collected are central to their use of feedback [21, 22, 23]. It is therefore important to understand how residents and physician-educators would incorporate it into their practices. This understanding would facilitate the implementation of appropriate assessment strategies within paediatric settings that adhere to or are transitioning to CBME and optimize feedback use. Within paediatrics, medical educators also need to be mindful of the important role that patients’ parents (i. e., caregivers, guardians) can play in resident assessment and understand how residents and physician-educators would use parent feedback.
Parents are experts on residents’ interactions with them and their children, as they directly witness residents’ performance. Therefore, parents are considered important sources of feedback in multisource feedback [14, 24], an assessment method that includes the perspectives and observations of various assessors [25, 26]. That said, a review of assessment data found that only 34% of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education specialties and subspecialty programs in the United States (US) included family members as assessors, but that this involvement was increasingly prevalent in primary care specialties, including paediatrics, where learners had multiple interactions with family members . In the Canadian paediatric context, parents typically provide feedback informally when physician-educators request it. This informal parent feedback is a potential reflection of the limited research on parent involvement in assessment processes and on the development of educational assessment tools to facilitate this involvement . Few studies have examined residents’ and physician-educators’ use of parent feedback. As such, the aim of this study was to answer: How would paediatric residents and physician-educators use parent feedback generated from questionnaire-based assessments?
To fulfil the study aim, we used a basic interpretive qualitative approach , within a constructivist viewpoint. This approach seeks to understand a phenomenon from the perspective of those who experience it and provides a descriptive account of the findings. As our understanding of the potential use of parent feedback in this context is limited, this approach allowed us to describe this use from the perspective of paediatric residents and physician-educators. However, we recognize that our backgrounds as PhD-trained health professions education researchers and advocates for patient and family engagement in educational processes are also reflected throughout this study and our interpretation of the findings. We obtained approval from the study site’s Research Ethics Board prior to study commencement.
Setting and participants
We conducted this study at a standalone, urban paediatric academic health science centre in Ontario, Canada. This centre is committed to patient- and family-centred care. The paediatrics residency program at this centre typically consists of 40 residents and is currently preparing to transition to CBME.
We used purposeful sampling  to recruit residents enrolled in the paediatrics residency program as well as physician-educators with resident supervision and assessment responsibilities. We sought to identify individuals with similar relationships to and experiences with resident training and assessment in order to pair them for participation in dyadic interviews. Specifically, we recruited and paired paediatric residents by postgraduate year and physician-educators by number of years of experience supervising and assessing residents in order create a safe interview space for participants to express their opinions and minimize any potential hierarchy issues within each dyad . The research assistant emailed the information letter to paediatric residents on rotation and to physician-educators at the centre via their designated listservs. With this information letter, we invited interested residents and physician-educators to contact the research assistant for additional information and to schedule an interview.
We [KE and KAM] individually conducted the dyadic interviews from October to November 2015 while the research assistant took notes. Dyadic interviews require two interviewees (i. e., two residents or two physician-educators) to interact with one another, engage in dialogue on the topic, and share ideas while answering open-ended questions posed by a moderator [32, 33]. This data collection method allows participants to share their experiences and thoughts on a topic in an in-depth manner that is not always feasible in focus groups, while maintaining and encouraging the active interaction between participants, which is lost in one-on-one interviews.
Dyadic interview questions and example prompts
1. Tell us a little bit about yourselves
2. If you were to receive feedback from parents/caregivers through a questionnaire for a resident you were supervising, how would you use that feedback?
Example prompt: How would it inform what you do as an educator?
3. In your opinion, how would the resident use that feedback?
Example prompt: How would it inform their training or practices?
4. Is there anything else on this topic that you would like to talk about?
1. Tell us a little bit about yourselves
2. If you were to receive feedback from parents/caregivers through a questionnaire, how would you use that feedback?
Example prompt: How would it inform your training?
3. In your opinion, how would your supervising physician use that feedback?
Example prompt: How would it inform what they do as an educator?
4. Is there anything else on this topic that you would like to talk about?
The transcribed interviews were entered into NVivo 11 to organize and manage the data . We independently analyzed and coded the data, ensuring rigor and trustworthiness. A systematic, three-step approach to data analysis was used: data reduction, data display, and conclusions and verifications . Our research question, the assessment literature, and our interview notes and summaries guided our analysis. First we reduced the data by developing an initial coding scheme. Next, we conducted an in-depth review of the transcripts and coded the data as per our initial coding scheme, while allowing new codes to emerge from the data. Then we met to compare and discuss our analysis and made minor revisions to our initial coding scheme. This allowed us to identify categories  across the participant groups and ensure that we fulfilled our study purpose. Using the final coding scheme, we created a matrix query in NVivo to display and review the data across the participant groups, allowing us to better understand the findings and draw conclusions. We also extracted supporting quotations for reporting purposes. We created an audit trail to document all coding decisions .
Six paediatric residents and six physician-educators participated in this study. Half of the residents (n = 3) were female and two were from each year 1, 2, and 3 of residency. Four of the physician-educators were female. All had experience supervising and assessing residents: two had 1–5 years; two had 6–10 years; and two had 16–20 years of experience.
Paediatric residents and physician-educators believed that they would use parent feedback to: (a) provide additional direct observations of residents’ performances, (b) teach and coach residents, (c) assess residents’ overall performance and progression, and (d) encourage resident self-assessment and behaviour change.
To provide additional direct observations of residents’ performances
We are making a bit of a leap to say we understand how they interact with us and we have, you know, good vibes versus a little bit of fear. … we perceive that’s how they would carry themselves with the families.
… they [staff] don’t often see you communicate with patients. And if they do, it’s kind of a nerve-wracking experience as well. It’s a very artificial one. … your interaction is completely different from how you would normally do it, mostly because you’re watching your ps and qs cause you’re trying to be so professional for your staff, so that may not be the way you actually are and I think it’s really good to get that feedback … this is actually how I’m going to interact with a patient when they come in.
To teach and coach residents
… if there was an episode where I was flagrantly unprofessional, flagrantly a bad communicator… I still want to know about that. … if it [assessment] goes to the staff… and [they] go ‘well there was one episode where we don’t think the communication went as well as you could’ve, here are some things that you can work on’ …
I think that [parent assessments] would provide very valuable feedback that could be read back in a summative fashion to the resident … at the end of the shift to say ‘Okay, so this is the feedback of the parent of Johnny. They’ve identified these two things that you could have done better. Let’s talk about that.’ And it becomes an opportunity. A really teachable moment, right?
So in those instances where there are people who have been identified as potentially unprofessional, but it’s been a difficult way to substantiate that or give any evidence of it and that would be helpful hearing … Like from a parent … ‘Actually that encounter was completely unprofessional and this is why.’
… if there’s a trend over time of parents saying similar comments or the same kind of ratings … that could be a flag to you … that this is someone that you need to go into the room with them and work together to figure out why the parents are getting that.
To assess residents’ overall performance and progression
I did one of my rotations in July, I could have been terrible, I don’t know. I’m gonna do two other senior blocks before I get that feedback for the first one. So, I could have really used that information to change how I’m interacting for the next two [rotations] …
If our staff have it, and they’re doing our final evals, and they’re kind of helping [with] that to put in specific comments … and … rate us on how we did on our communicator role, like on the final ITER [In-Training Evaluation Report], I can see that being possibly useful to them.
… hopefully that, even though it’s only a month that we’ve imparted some [knowledge] and made some refinement to some of those softer skills about those CanMEDS roles around collaborator and around communicator and around health advocate … getting evaluations from parents and getting them back to them [residents] … [if it] was actually resulting in a better doctor at the end of the month if not at some point near the end of the residency …
To encourage resident self-assessment and behaviour change
… you get all these suggestions from the staff about ‘this is how I do it … so therefore, this is how you should do it’. But you have 10 different people who do it 10 different ways, so you kind of pick what you think is best. But it would be really nice from the … receiver, the caregiver or the child who is getting … what we’re putting out for them, how they actually took it. Because I think that is actually the more important thing.
Negative feedback is, thankfully, it’s more uncommon, but when you do get it, there’s a lot more thinking about negative feedback. And, you know, the process is usually first of all, do I consciously agree with that parent assessment of, or that negative feedback that I’m getting from them … and if I do, well then we say, okay, well what led to that?
The physician-educators explained that providing residents with parent feedback would provide them with: ‘… feedback that’s truly of value to them. That they’re going to appreciate, that they’re going to incorporate and use and not feel like it’s just one more thing.’ Reflecting from a resident perspective, a physician-educator further explained that ‘… it would be invaluable to know how people perceive you and how people perceive their interaction with you. And what you could work on to do better and what you do well. And you could carry that forward.’
This study sought to understand how paediatric residents and physician-educators would use parent feedback generated from questionnaire-based assessments. Assessment in CBME demands direct observations of authentic resident-patient-parent interactions. This performance-based assessment is critical for residents’ professional growth to ensure that they can enact the skills they have learned in clinical settings [14, 15, 19, 38]. Moreover, this type of assessment should be done regularly, rather than on a one-off basis, to properly reflect residents’ skills and abilities . We believe parents can provide timely feedback that can be regularly collected via a questionnaire following their interactions with a resident. The immediate use of parent feedback would benefit residents by facilitating appropriate resident recall and opportunity for immediate behaviour change . However, to enable parents to provide feedback, we need to develop and use questionnaires designed specifically for parents in paediatric contexts .
Participants’ descriptions of how they would use parent feedback suggest that they view parents as credible sources of feedback. This aligns with research from the US showing that the inclusion of family members as assessors is more prevalent in primary care specialties . The participants noted that parents directly observe residents as they interact with them and their children, and therefore are directly familiar with residents’ performance. These views are important to consider as the credibility of the assessor is a central factor in the use of feedback [21, 22, 23]. Further, the participants thought that parent feedback would be important and meaningful for residents’ professional development. These perceptions reflect those of previous research that described learners’ perceptions of service user involvement in health professions education as a positive and rewarding professional development experience .
In multisource feedback, an assessment method promoted within CBME , family members are viewed as a source of feedback for residents in addition to that from physician-educators, peers, and other health professionals [14, 24, 26]. Research has shown that feedback generated through this questionnaire-based method is generally accepted by learners and that they use it to reflect on and/or make changes to their practices . The participants expressed desire for parent feedback in addition to that from physician-educators. That being said, in the Canadian paediatric context, feedback from family members is typically provided informally and on an ad hoc basis, most often if physician-educators ask for their feedback on residents who interacted with them. In fact, while multisource feedback is used within the paediatrics program in this study, parent feedback is not included in it.
The findings from this study suggest that there is value in incorporating parent feedback into assessment processes across all paediatric residency programs. This would contribute to well-rounded assessments and ensure consistency across programs [40, 41]. Incorporating parent feedback would promote and facilitate the consistent use of this feedback in training environments, all of which are necessary factors in using feedback for self-assessment . Self-assessment plays an integral role in medical education; reflective practice is encouraged and modelled so that residents involve themselves in their own learning and assessment. The literature also highlights that self-assessment should not be done in isolation, but informed by multiple sources of evidence [14, 42]. The participants expressed that they would use parent feedback to inform resident self-assessment and in turn, inform their reflections on their behaviours and practices. Therefore, parent feedback can be a valuable contribution to this process.
This study presents certain limitations that should be considered. It included a limited group of paediatric residents from a single paediatric residency program and a limited group of physician-educators from a single paediatric academic health science centre. Further, this study described residents’ and physician-educators’ perceptions of how they would use parent feedback, and does not report descriptions of their actual use of this feedback.
Parents can play an important role in paediatric resident assessment. This study provides an initial understanding of how paediatric residents and physician-educators would use parent feedback. This information, combined with future research, can inform the development and implementation of parent feedback strategies. Importantly, it can help promote the use of parent feedback for paediatric resident assessment in CBME.
Conflict of interest
K. Eady and K.A. Moreau declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical approval was sought and obtained from the centre’s Research Ethics Board. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. There was no potential harm to participants and participants signed an informed consent form prior to participating. While anonymity could not be guaranteed because of the use of dyadic interviews, participants were asked to keep each other’s identities as well as the information shared in the interviews confidential.
- 13.Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. CBD implementation 2017. 2017. http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/cbd/cbd-implementation-e. Accessed 4 July 2017.Google Scholar
- 15.Holmboe ES. Direct observation by faculty. In: Holmboe ES, Hawkins RE, editors. Practical guide to the evaluation of clinical competence. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2008. pp. 119–29.Google Scholar
- 25.Lockyer J, Clyman SG. Multisource feedback (360-degree evaluation). In: Holmboe ES, Hawkins RE, editors. Practical guide to the evaluation of clinical competence. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2008. pp. 75–85.Google Scholar
- 29.Merriam SB. Qualitative research in practice. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.Google Scholar
- 30.Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: SAGE; 2015.Google Scholar
- 34.Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: SAGE; 1985.Google Scholar
- 35.NVivo 11 for Windows. 11 ed. Burlington, MA: QSR International; 2015.Google Scholar
- 36.Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1994.Google Scholar
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.