TLBO Algorithm for Multi-Level Inverter-Based Multi-Terminal HVDC System in Grid-Tied Photovoltaic Power Plant


The main objective of this paper is to overcome the problems with conventionally tuned proportional-plus-integral (PI) controller by using TLBO-PI technique, which enhances the dynamic performance. The significant problem is that it is not able to provide optimal parameters, which is overcome by new teaching-learning-based optimization (TLBO) algorithm. This research work develops a new TLBO for multi-level inverter (MLI)-based multi-terminal HVDC (MLI-MT-HVDC) in grid-tied photovoltaic power plants (GTPVPPs). In this, 7-level inverter is replaced by a conventional 3-level, due to its advantage of less number of switching components, less dc source requirement, low total harmonic distortion (THD) and due to main effective reason of application in HVDC transmission. Here two terminals with individual grid integration are interconnected to a common terminal of solar distributed generation (DG). Among those terminals with grid integration, one is faulty and other is healthy terminal, in which the healthy terminal is not affected due to the fault on a faulty terminal. A teacher and students in a class are employed in step-by-step manner to generate an optimal result. The test system is also controlled with a fuzzy logic controller (FLC), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), but due to its simple structure and its application in industries, a PI controller with new optimization method is implemented. Additionally, it is clear that TLBO-PI can reduce the THD to the level as per IEEE 519-2014 standards, improve fault-ride-through (FRT) capability and enhance the dynamic performance better during abnormalities and dynamic load.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7


  1. 1.

    B. Badrzadeh, HVDC Transmission: technology and practical aspects part 1. IEEE Tutorial (2012)

  2. 2.

    IEEE Guide for Establishing Basic Requirements for High-Voltage Direct-Current Transmission Protection and Control Equipment. in IEEE Std 1899–2017, pp.1–47 (2017).

  3. 3.

    IEECutE Guide for Specification of High-Voltage Direct-Current Systems. Part I - Steady-State Performance in ANSI/IEEE Std 1030–1987, pp 0–1 (1988).

  4. 4.

    X. Zhao, K. Li, Y. Xue, in Backstepping DC Voltage Control in a Multi-terminal HVDC System Connecting Offshore Wind Farms. ICSEE 2014, LSMS 2014: Intelligent Computing in Smart Grid and Electrical Vehicles, springer, pp 286-295

  5. 5.

    G.-J. Li, S.-Y. Ruan, T.T. Lie, Real power regulation design for multi-terminal VSC-HVDC systems. Cent. Eur. J. Eng. 3(2), 243–252 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    I.M. Sanz, P.D. Judge, C.E. Spallarossa, B. Chaudhuri, T.C. Green, Dynamic overload capability of VSC HVDC interconnections for frequency support. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 32(4), 1544–1553 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    A.S. Abdel-Khalik, A.M. Massoud, A.A. Elserougi, S. Ahmed, Optimum power transmission-based droop control design for multi-terminal HVDC of offshore wind farms. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(3), 3401–3409 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    J. Wang, J. Liang, C. Wang, X. Dong, Circulating current suppression for MMC-HVDC under unbalanced grid conditions. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 53(4), 3250–3259 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    J. Beerten, S. Cole, R. Belmans, Modeling of multi-terminal VSC HVDC systems with distributed dc voltage control. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 29(1), 34–42 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    J. Cao, W. Du, H.F. Wang, An improved corrective security constrained OPF for meshed AC/DC grids with multi-terminal VSC-HVDC. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31(1), 485–495 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    H. Ito, HVDC Switching Equipment. CIGRE Green Books Book Series (CIGREGB), Switching Equipment, pp 503-538

  12. 12.

    A. Raza, X. Dianguo, L. Yuchao, S. Xunwen, B.W. Williams, C. Cecati, Coordinated operation and control of VSC based multiterminal High voltage DC transmission systems. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 7(1), 364–373 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    J. Renedo, A. García-Cerrada, L. Rouco, Active power control strategies for transient stability enhancement of AC/DC grids with VSC-HVDC multi-terminal systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31(6), 4595–4604 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    G.P. Adam, I. Abdelsalam, L. Xu, J. Fletcher, G. Burt, B. Williams, Multi-tasking dc-dc and dc-ac converters for dc voltage tapping and power control in highly meshed multi-terminal HVDC networks. IET Power Electron. 10(15), 2217–2228 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    R. Li, L. Xu, L. Yao, B.W. Williams, Active control of DC solid-state transformers during ride-through operation of multi-terminal HVDC systems. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 31(4), 1336–1346 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    M. Stumpe, P. Tünnerhoff, J. Dave, A. Schnettler, D. Ergin, A. Schön, K. Würflinger, F. Schettler, DC fault protection for modular multi-level converter-based HVDC multi-terminal systems with solid state circuit breakers. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 12(12), 3013–3020 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    T. Lova Lakshmi, M. Gopichand Naik, Active control of excessive AC currents at PCC of grid-tied multi-terminal HVDC system during fault ride through operation. J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst. 10(4), 339–346 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    M. Mirhosseini, J. Pou, B. Karanayil, V.G. Agelidis, Resonant verses conventional controllers in grid-connected photovoltaic power plants under unbalanced grid voltages. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 7(3), 1124–1132 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    A. Yazdani, R. Iravani, Voltage-Sourced Converters in Power Systems Modeling, Control, and Applications (IEEE Press, Chichester, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    R. Teodorescu, M. Liserre, P. Rodriguez, F. Blaabjerg, Grid Converters for Photovoltaic and Wind Power Systems (Wiley, West Sussex, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    519-2014: IEEE Recommended Practice and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electric Power Systems, Revision of IEEE Std 519-1992 (2014)

  22. 22.

    F. Meng, W. Yang, S. Yang, L. Gao, Active harmonic reduction for 12-pulse diode bridge rectifier at DC side with two-stage auxiliary circuit. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 11(1), 64–73 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    T. Wanjekeche, D.V. Nicolae, A.A. Jimoh, Modeling, Control and Simulation of Cascaded 3-5-9 Hybrid Inverter Topology for Grid Interface Application, in Smart Power Grids 2011. Power Systems, ed. by A. Keyhani, M. Marwali (Springer, Berlin, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sadigh A.K., MasoudBarakati S. (2012) Topologies and Control Strategies of Multilevel Converters. In: Wang L. (eds) Modeling and Control of Sustainable Power Systems. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  25. 25.

    T. Lova Lakshmi, M. Gopichand naik, Unbalanced voltage compensation of grid integrated PV system with fuzzy based novel seven level inverter. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 13(13), 11201–11207 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    R. Venkata Rao, Teaching Learning Based Optimization Algorithm and Its Engineering Applications (Springer, London, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    S. Subramanian, M. Abirami, S. Ganesan, Reliable/cost-effective maintenance schedules for a composite power system using fuzzy supported teaching learning algorithm. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 9(9), 805–819 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    R. Buddala, S.S. Mahapatra, An integrated approach for scheduling flexible job-shop using teaching–learning-based optimization method. J. Ind. Eng. Int. (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    E. Natarajan, V. Kaviarasan, W.H. Lim, S.S. Tiang, T.H. Tan, Enhanced Multi-Objective Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization for Machining of Delrin (IEEE Access, Chichester, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Lova Lakshmi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lova Lakshmi, T., Gopichand Naik, M. & Rajendra Prasad, S. TLBO Algorithm for Multi-Level Inverter-Based Multi-Terminal HVDC System in Grid-Tied Photovoltaic Power Plant. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. B (2020).

Download citation


  • Multi-level inverter
  • Solar PV
  • PI controller
  • Grid integration
  • TLBO technique