Advertisement

Optimal Contractor Selection in Construction Industry: The Fuzzy Way

  • M. V. Krishna Rao
  • V. S. S. Kumar
  • P. Rathish Kumar
Original Contribution
  • 117 Downloads

Abstract

A purely price-based approach to contractor selection has been identified as the root cause for many serious project delivery problems. Therefore, the capability of the contractor to execute the project should be evaluated using a multiple set of selection criteria including reputation, past performance, performance potential, financial soundness and other project specific criteria. An industry-wide questionnaire survey was conducted with the objective of identifying the important criteria for adoption in the selection process. In this work, a fuzzy set based model was developed for contractor prequalification/evaluation, by using effective criteria obtained from the percept of construction professionals, taking subjective judgments of decision makers also into consideration. A case study consisting of four alternatives (contractors in the present case) solicited from a public works department of Pondicherry in India, is used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The final selection of contractor is made based on the integrated score or Overall Evaluation Score of the decision alternative in prequalification as well as bid evaluation stages.

Keywords

Contractor evaluation Fuzzy Set Theory Prequalification Selection criteria Overall Evaluation Score 

References

  1. 1.
    L.G. Crowley, D.E. Hancher, Evaluation of competitive bids. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. ASCE 121(2), 238–245 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Alhazmi, R. McCaffer, Project procurement system selection model. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. ASCE 126(3), 176–184 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Herrera, V.E. Herrera, Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 115, 67–82 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Banaitiene, A. Banaitis, Analysis of criteria for contractors’ qualification evaluation. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 12(4), 276–282 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Herrera, V.E. Herrera, J.L. Verdegay, A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assignments. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 78, 73–87 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Sonmez, J.B. Yang, G.D. Holt, Addressing the contractor selection problem using an evidential reasoning approach. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 8(3), 198–210 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.S. Russell, D.E. Hancher, M.J. Skibniewski, Contractor prequalification data for construction owners. Constr. Manag. Econ. 10, 117–129 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G.D. Holt, P.O. Olomolaiye, F.C. Harris, Evaluating prequalification criteria in contractor selection. Build. Environ. 29(4), 437–448 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Z. Hatush, M. Skitmore, Criteria for contractor selection. Constr. Manag. Econ. 15(1), 19–38 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Waara, J. Brochner, Price and non-price criteria for contractor selection. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. ASCE 132(8), 797–804 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.V. Krishna Rao, V.S.S. Kumar, P. Rathish Kumar, Contractor selection criteria in the indian context: a proposal. NICMAR J. Constr. Manag. 30(3), 13–22 (2015). (July–September Issue) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Palaneeswaran, M. Kumaraswamy, Recent advances and proposed improvements in contractor prequalification methodologies. Build. Environ. 36(1), 73–87 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V.U. Nguyen, Tender evaluation by fuzzy sets. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. ASCE 111(3), 231–243 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G.D. Holt, P.O. Olomolaiye, F.C. Harris, Applying multi-attribute analysis to contractor selection decisions. Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 1(3), 139–148 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Z. Hatush, M. Skitmore, Assessment and evaluation of contractor data against client goals using PERT approach. Constr. Manag. Econ. 15, 327–340 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.S. Russell, M.J. Skibniewski, Qualifier-2: knowledge-based system for contractor prequalification. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. ASCE 116(1), 157–171 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Sonmez, G.D. Holt, J.B. Yang, G. Graham, Applying evidential reasoning to prequalifying construction contractors. J. Manag. Eng. 18(3), 111–119 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. McCabe, V. Tran, J. Ramani, Construction prequalification using data envelopment analysis. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 32(1), 183–193 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A.S. Hanna, J.S. Russell, M.A. Taha, S.C. Park, Application of neural networks to owner–contractor prequalification, in ed. by N Kartam, I Flood, J.H Garrett Artificial neural networks for civil engineers: fundamentals and applications (ASCE, New York, 1997), pp. 124–136Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    K.C. Lam, T.S. Hu, S.T. Ng, M. Skitmore, S.O. Cheung, A fuzzy neural network approach for contractor pre-qualification. Constr. Manag. Econ. 19, 175–188 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. Singh, R.L.K. Tiong, Fuzzy decision framework for contractor selection. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. ASCE 131(1), 62–70 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. Singh, R.L.K. Tiong, Contractor selection criteria: investigation of opinions of Singapore construction practitioners. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. ASCE 132(9), 998–1008 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A.N. Morote, F. Ruz-Vila, A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for construction contractor prequalification. Autom. Constr. 25, 8–19 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M.V. Krishna Rao, V.S.S. Kumar, P. Rathish Kumar, Prequalification of contractor in the construction industry using multi-attribute utility theory: a multiplicative approach. Malays. J. Civ. Eng. 28(3), 469–480 (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    P. Paul, P.S. Salini, S. Mohan. Selection of the most optimal contractor in Indian Construction Industry using TOPSIS and Extended TOPSIS model. IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng. 67–78 (2016). https://www.iosrjournals.org
  26. 26.
    M.V. Krishna Rao. Multi-criteria decision making for contractor selection—a fuzzy set theoretic approach. Ph.D. thesis, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. Plebankiewicz, Criteria of contractor selection used by Polish investors. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 15(4), 377–385 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    T.H. Nguyen, T. Shehab, Selecting an architecture–engineering team by using fuzzy set theory. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 15(3), 282–298 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institution of Engineers (India) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. V. Krishna Rao
    • 1
  • V. S. S. Kumar
    • 2
  • P. Rathish Kumar
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringChaitanya Bharathi Institute of TechnologyHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kakinada KakinadaIndia
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyWarangalIndia

Personalised recommendations