C-Based Design Methodology and Topological Change for an Indian Agricultural Tractor Component
The failure of tractor components and their replacement has now become very common in India because of re-cycling, re-sale, and duplication. To over come the problem of failure we propose a design methodology for topological change co-simulating with software’s. In the proposed Design methodology, the designer checks Paxial, Pcr, Pfailue, τ by hand calculations, from which refined topological changes of R.S.Arm are formed. We explained several techniques employed in the component for reduction, removal of rib material to change center of gravity and centroid point by using system C for mixed level simulation and faster topological changes. The design process in system C can be compiled and executed with software, TURBO C7. The modified component is developed in proE and analyzed in ANSYS. The topologically changed component with slot 120 × 4.75 × 32.5 mm at the center showed greater effectiveness than the original component.
KeywordsAgricultural tractor Rock shaft arm c-programming Pro-E ANSYS
- 3.A.K. Matta, V. Purushottam, Analysis of the Novel Brake rotor using FEM. In 5th International & 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference, AIMTDR, IIT Guwahati, Assam, India (2014), pp. 869-1–869-4Google Scholar
- 5.A.K. Matta, D.R. Raju, K.N.S. Suman, 3D DESIGN support and software compensation for rapid virtual prototyping of tractor rockshaft arm. In 1st international Conference on CASCE, Dong-A University, Busan, South Korea (2016), pp. 91–94Google Scholar
- 8.A.K. Matta, D.R. Raju, K.N.S. Suman, 3D Design support and software compensation for rapid virtual prototyping of tractor rockshaft arm. In Advances in Civil, Architectural, Structural and Constructional Engineering, Chapter.19, e-books, crc net base (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2016), pp. 91–94Google Scholar
- 9.A.K. Matta, D.R. Raju, K.N.S. Suman, Modeling and optimization of rapid prototyping for an agricultural tractor component. Discov. Eng. J. 13, 375–378 (2016)Google Scholar