Advertisement

Intrinsic Factors Influencing Decision making of Arbitrators in Dispute Resolution of variation Claims

  • K. C. Iyer
  • N. B. Chaphalkar
  • Smita K. Patil
Original Contribution

Abstract

Occurrence of disputes is a common feature in construction contracts. Adjudication of disputes through the arbitration process involves detailed and through analysis of facts and evidences related to the case before arriving at the final decision. These facts and evidences have been explored by researchers to develop dispute resolution mechanisms. As a part of the research, the present work identifies the factors which influence the decision making of arbitrators in resolving disputes through a case study of 72 arbitration awards and settled court cases related to Indian construction contracts. This work further seeks consensus for the identified factors from experts and also ranks the factors based on their importance with the help of the responses obtained through a questionnaire survey and statistical tests.

Keywords

Construction disputes Claims Dispute resolution Arbitration awards Variation Intrinsic factors 

References

  1. 1.
    K.C. Iyer, S.N. Kalidindi, L.S. Ganesh, Dispute prone contract clauses—a basis for operational flexibility in contract administration. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 3(4), 39–51 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K.C. Iyer, N.B. Chaphalkar, Understanding head office overheads in construction project, CE & CR, pp. 30–36 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Mahfouz, A. Kandil, Factors Affecting Litigation Outcomes of Differing Site Conditions (DSC) Disputes: A Logistic Regression Models (LRM). in Construction Research Congress, pp. 239–248 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Arditi, F.E. Oksay, O.B. Tokdemir, Predicting the outcome of construction litigation using neural networks. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 13, 75–81 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Arditi, T. Pulket, Predicting the outcome of construction litigation using boosted decision trees. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 19(4), 387–393 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K.W. Chau, Application of PSO-based neural network in analysis of outcomes of construction claims. Autom. Constr. 16, 642–646 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Pulket, D. Arditi, Construction litigation prediction system using ant colony optimization. Constr. Manag. Econ. 27, 241–251 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Arditi, T. Pulket, Predicting the outcome of construction litigation using an integrated artificial intelligence model. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 24(1), 73–80 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N.B. Chaphalkar, S.S. Sandbhor, Comparison of provision for escalation in various Indian construction contract forms. J. Constr. Eng. Technol. Manag. (JoCETM) II(1), 1–11 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B.S. Patil, Building and Engineering Contracts, 5th edn. (Mrs. S. B. Patil Publications, Aundh, 2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Gajria, GT Gajria’s Law Relating to Building and Engineering Contracts in India, 4th edn. (LexisNexis Butterworths, New Delhi, 2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H.R. Thomas, D.E. Wright, Resolving disputes over contract notice requirements. J. Const. Eng. Manag. 116(4), 738–755 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Diekmann, C. Nelson, Construction claims: frequency and severity. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 111(1), 74–81 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    N.B. Chaphalkar, S.K. Patil, Causes and implications of variation and deviations in construction contracts. NICMAR J. Constr. Manag. XXV(III), 34–44 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. El-adaway, A.S. Ezeldin, J.K. Yates, Arbitral Tribunal Proceedings Case Study: Egyptian Large Scale Construction Project. J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 1(3), 147–153 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Ndihokubwayo, T. Haupt, Uncovering the Origins of Variation Orders, in 5th Postgraduate Conference—Construction Industry Development Board, Bloemfontein-South Africa (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edn. (SAGE Publications Inc, Thousand oaks, 2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institution of Engineers (India) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. C. Iyer
    • 1
  • N. B. Chaphalkar
    • 2
  • Smita K. Patil
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringJSPM’s Rajarshi Shahu College of EngineeringPuneIndia
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringMAEER’s MIT College of EngineeringPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations