Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization and Standardization of Conditions for Production of Commercially Viable Formulation of Native Agrobacterium sp. UHFBA-218

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
National Academy Science Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies were carried out for the mass multiplication of native Agrobacterium sp. UHFBA-218 (MCC 2101, NCBI: KC488176; deposited as UHFBA-218[Cherry 2E-2-2]) and Rhizobium rhizogenes strain K84 at different pH, temperature, incubation period, broth media and at different air supply. The most effective pH, temperature, incubation period, broth medium and air supply for both the isolates was 7.0, 25 °C, 4 days, yeast extract mannitol broth medium and 20 L/min, respectively. These parameters were further used for mass multiplication of these strains and mixing the multiplied bacterial inoculum for studying the viability of Agrobacterium sp. UHFBA-218 and R. rhizogenes strain K84 in different carrier media—white stone powder, carboxymethyl cellulose and activated charcoal during 6 months of storage at room temperature at three different locations, mixed in one part of broth culture in exponential phase having 270 ± 10 × 1012 cfu/ml to two part of carrier and one part of broth culture mixed to five part of carrier and were compared for viable counts observed in different formulations kept at 4 °C for reference. White stone powder was superior to other carrier media tested under these studies. There were appreciable counts ranging from 34.67 to 103.3 × 108 cfu/g after 6 months of room temperature storage at different locations. However, irrespective of strains, storage at 4 °C temperature provided maximum viability of 108.50 and 155.7 × 108 cfu/g in white stone powder mixed in 1:5 and 1:2 ratios, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Gelvin SB (2003) Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: the biology behind the “gene-jockeying” tool. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:16–37

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mousavi SA, Osterman J, Wahlberg N, Nesme X, Lavire C, Vial L, Paulin L, de Lajudie P, Lindstrom K (2014) Phylogeny of the Rhizobium-Allorhizobium-Agrobacterium clade supports the delineation of Neorhizobium gen. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 37:208–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mousavi SA, Willems A, Nesme X, de Lajudie P, Lindström K (2015) Revised phylogeny of Rhizobiaceae: proposal of the delineation of Pararhizobium gen. nov., and 13 new species combinations. Syst Appl Microbiol 38:84–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Petersen SG, Stummann BM, Olesen P, Henningsen KW (1989) Structure and function of root-inducing (Ri) plasmids and their relation to tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmids. Plant Physiol 77:427–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kerr A (1972) Biological control of crown gall: seed inoculation. J Appl Bacteriol 35:493–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore LW, Warren G (1979) Agrobacterium radiobacter strain K84 and biological control of crown gall. Ann Rev Phytopathol 17:163–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anonymous (2012) Completion report of NFBSRA/PCN/AP-18/2007-08 project ‘‘Molecular analysis of agrocin producing Agrobacterium radiobacter for biological control of crown gall in stone fruits”. Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Dr. Y.S.Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, p 38

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dua A, Sangwan N, Kaur J, Saxena A, Kohli P, Gupta AK, Lal R (2013) Draft genome sequence of Agrobacterium sp. strain UHFBA-218, isolated from rhizosphere soil of crown gall-infected cherry rootstock Colt. Genome Announc 1(3):e00302-13. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomea.00302-13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Okereke GU, Okeh O (2007) Survival of cowpea bradyrhizobia in carrier materials and inoculation response in soil. Afr Crop Sci Soc Conf Proc 8:1183–1186

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoben HJ, Somasegaran P (1982) Comparison of the pour, spread and drop plate method for enumeration of Rhizobium spp. In inoculants made from pre sterilized peat. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:1246–1247

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1983) Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 357–427

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith EF, Townsend CO (1907) A plant tumor of bacterial origin. Science 25:671–673

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore LW, Canfield M (1996) Biology of Agrobacterium and management of crown gall disease. In: Hall R (ed) Principles and practice of managing soil borne plant pathogens. APS Press, St. Paul, pp 151–191

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pesenti-Barili B, Ferdani E, Mosti M, Degli- Innocenti F (1991) Survival of Agrobacterium radiobacter K84 on various carriers for crown gall control. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2047–2051

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kloepper JW, Schroth MN (1981) Development of a powder formulation of rhizobacteria for inoculation of potato seed pieces. Phytopathology 71:590–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaljeet S, Keyeo F, Amir HG (2011) Influence of carrier materials temperature on survivability of rhizobial inoculants. Asian J Plant Sci 10(6):331–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thomson J A (1984) Production and quality control of carrier based inoculants. International crop research institute for semi-arid tropics. http://dspaceIcrisat.ac.in/handle/10731/908

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to the Dean, College of Horticulture, Dr. Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan-173 230, Himachal Pradesh for providing lab facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, A., Gupta, A.K. & Mahajan, R. Optimization and Standardization of Conditions for Production of Commercially Viable Formulation of Native Agrobacterium sp. UHFBA-218. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 41, 249–253 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-018-0638-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-018-0638-x

Keywords

Navigation