Solid state characterization of two novel gums from Cedrela odorata and Enterolobium cyclocarpum
- 71 Downloads
Functional and physicochemical properties of two novel polymers from plants were characterized with a view of determining suitability for use in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Cedrela gum (CD) and Enterolobium gum (ET) were extracted from the incised trunk of Cedrela odorata (Meliaceae) and Enterolobium cyclocarpum (Mimosoideae) trees respectively. The gums were characterized using particle size and distribution analysis, density measurements, swelling index, angle of repose, Carrs’ compressibility index and Hausner’s ratio. Other physicochemical properties were determined by pH measurement, powder X-ray diffractometry (PXRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and viscometry. Hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose (HPMC) was the reference polymer. The polymers generally had particle size range of 145–436 µm and the particles were normally distributed. The gums had comparable particle density, Carr’s index and Hausner’s ratio with HPMC, indicating similar packing properties between the gums and HPMC. All polymers had angle of repose values in the range for excellent flow properties. The polymers were of alkaline pH, thereby suggesting compatibility with basic drugs. Hydration capacity of the polymers was generally high. The ranking order for viscosity was ET > CD > HPMC (p < 0.05). Similar thermal behaviour was recorded by DSC for the gums and HPMC. SEM revealed irregularly shaped and aggregating surface morphology while broad halo diffraction patterns were obtained by the PXRD. CD and ET gums showed comparable functional and physicochemical properties with HPMC, a standard polymer. These gums could be used as pharmaceutical excipients in bioadhesive formulations and other drug delivery systems.
KeywordsPolymers Solid state Enterolobium gum Cedrela gum Excipients
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
John O. Ayorinde and Michael A. Odeniyi hereby declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of human and animal right
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subject performed by any of the authors.
- Amaro MI, Tajber L, Corrigan OI, Healy AM (2014) Co-spray dried carbohydrate microparticles: crystallization delay/inhibition and improved aerosolization characteristics through the incorporation of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin with amorphous raffinose or trehalose. Pharm Res 32:180–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ayorinde JO (2008) Effects of formulation variables on compression characteristics of diclofenac tablet formulations. Dissertation, University of Ibadan, NigeriaGoogle Scholar
- Ayorinde JO, Odeku OA, Itiola OA (2005) The survival of Bacillus subtilis spores in dicalcium phosphate, lactose and corn starch and their binary mixtures during Tabletting. Pharm Technol 29(12):56–67Google Scholar
- Ayorinde JO, Itiola OA, Odeku OA, Odeniyi MA (2011) Influence of binder type and process parameters on the compression properties and microbial survival in diclofenac tablet formulations. Braz. J Pharm Sci 47(4):845–854Google Scholar
- Berressem P (1999) The birth of new delivery systems. Chem Br 35(2):29–32Google Scholar
- Cain J (2002) An alternative technique for determining ANSI/CEMA standard 550 flowability ratings for granular materials. Powder Hand Proc 14(3):218–220Google Scholar
- Janzen DH (1983) Enterolobium cyclocarpum. In: Janzen DH (ed) Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 816Google Scholar
- Odeniyi MA, Onu RN, Adetunji OA (2011) Evaluation of bioadhesive properties of natural and modified banana starches. East Central Afr J Pharm Sci 14(2):34–42Google Scholar
- Othman N, Azahari NA, Ismail H (2011) Thermal properties of polyvinyl alcohol (PVOH)/corn starch blend film. Malays Polym J 6(6):147–154Google Scholar
- Shaikh AM, Sayyed N, Shaikh S, Patel MS, Chavda AW (2011) Euphobia neriifolia LINN: a phytopharmacological review. Int Res J Pharm 2(5):41–48Google Scholar
- Wadsworth FH (1997) Forest production for tropical America. Agricultural Handbook 710 United States Department of AgricultureGoogle Scholar