Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Microlevel Analysis of the Adoption and Efficiency of Modern Farm Inputs Use in Rural Areas of Kano State, Nigeria

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study conducted a dual microanalysis of modern agricultural inputs use behaviour in rural areas of Kano State, Nigeria. Probit regression model was estimated to analyse the factors that influence modern inputs adoption. On the other hand, OLS, Poisson and instrumental variable regression models were used to estimate the efficiency of modern inputs adoption and consumption at farm level. The estimated OLS model indicates that additional use of 1 bag of fertiliser, increases the level of productivity by about 5.4%. Similarly, the estimated Poisson model indicates that an additional 1 bag of fertiliser use on a farm increases the productivity per hectare by about 4.5%. Meanwhile, the estimated 2SLS model shows that a 1% increase in the amount of fertiliser use increases the level of output productivity by about 0.34%. Furthermore, the method adopted by farmers on how to use modern agricultural inputs has a significant influence on the level of output production. Modern method of fertiliser application improves the level of output production. Government can use this medium to improve the rate of input use by rural farmers via agricultural schemes that will introduce the farmers to and maintain the modern techniques of farming. Additionally, farmers need to be exposed to skills and training on some off-farm jobs to raise their income to be able to afford the recommended amount of fertiliser. Lastly, the adoption of policies that will encourage the rate of farmers’ contact with extension agents will improve the manner of fertiliser utilisation which in turn increases the level of efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Akpan SB, Udoh EJ, Nkanta VS (2012) Factors influencing fertilizer use intensity among Small Holder Crop Farmers in Abak Agricultural Zone in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. J Biol Agric Healthc 2:54–65

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amadi AC (2010) An assessment of the socio-economic factors influencing fertilizer use among sugarcane farmers in Mumias. Dissertation, University of Nairobi

  4. Arslan A, McCarthy N, Lipper L, Asfaw S, Cattaneo A (2013) Adoption and intensity of adoption of conservation farming practices in Zambia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 187:72–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Assa M, Mehire A, Ngoma K, Magombo E, Gondwe P (2014) Determinants of smallholder farmers’ demand for purchased inputs in Lilongwe District, Malawi: Evidence from Mitundu extension planning area. Middle East J Sci Res 19:1313–1318

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bartlett JE, Kotrlik JW, Higgins C (2001) Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Inf Technol Learn Perform J 19:43–50

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chembezi DM (1990) Estimating fertiliser demand and output supply for Malawi’s smallholder agriculture. Agric Syst 33:293–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Danlami AH (2014) Determinants of demand for fertiliser: a conceptual review. IOSR J Econ Finance 4:45–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Danlami AH, Islam R, Applanaidu SD, Tsauni AM (2016) An empirical analysis of fertiliser use intensity in rural Sub-Saharan Africa Evidence from Tofa local government area, Kano State, Nigeria. Int J Soc Econ 43:1400–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dillman DA (2011) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method-2007 update with new internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  11. Druilhe Z, Barreiro-Hurlé J (2012) Fertiliser subsidies in sub-Saharan Africa (No. 12-04). ESA working paper

  12. Eakins J (2013) An analysis of the determinants of household energy expenditures: empirical evidence from the Irish household budget survey. Dissertation, University of Surrey

  13. Filippini M, Pachauri S (2004) Elasticities of electricity demand in urban Indian households. Energy Policy 32:429–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Greene WH (2002) Econometric analysis. Prince Hall Ltd., Newark

    Google Scholar 

  15. Idrisa YL, Gwary MM, Shehu H (2008) Analysis of food security status among farming households in Jere Local Government of Borno State, Nigeria. J Trop Agric Food Environ Ext 7:199–205

    Google Scholar 

  16. Idris AR, Ahmad N (2013) Demand for fertilizer in least developed countries (LDCs). Can Soc Sci 9:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kefyalew E (2010) Fertilizer consumption and agricultural productivity in Ethiopia. Working Papers 003, Ethiopian Development Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kormawa P, Munyemana A, Soule B (2003) Fertiliser market reforms and factors influencing fertiliser use by small-scale farmers in Bénin. Agric Ecosyst Environ 100:129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma L, Feng S, Reidsma P, Qu F, Heerink N (2014) Identifying entry points to improve fertiliser use efficiency in Taihu Basin, China. Land Use Policy 37:52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mariano MJ, Villano R, Fleming E (2012) Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of modern rice technologies and good management practices in the Philippines. Agric Syst 110:41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marenya P, Nkonya E, Xiong W, Deustua J, Kato E (2012) Which policy would work better for improved soil fertility management in sub-Saharan Africa, fertiliser subsidies or carbon credits? Agric Syst 110:162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mwangi WM (1996) Low use of fertilisers and low productivity in sub-Saharan Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 47:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Naseem A, Kelly VA (1999) Macro trends and determinates of fertilizer use in Sub-Saharan Africa (No. 54671). Michigan State University

  24. Nkamleu GB, Adesina AA (2000) Determinants of chemical input use in peri-urban lowland systems: bivariate probit analysis in Cameroon. Agric Syst 63:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oad FC, Buriro UA, Agha SK (2004) Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer application on maize fodder production. Asian J Plant Sci 3:375–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Olayide OE, Alene AD, Ikpi A (2009) Determinants of fertiliser use in Northern Nigeria. Pak J Soc Sci 6:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  27. Paudel P, Kumar AS, Matsuoka A (2009) Socio-economic factors influencing adoption of fertiliser for maize production in Nepal: a case study of Chitwan District. A paper presented at the 83rd annual conference of the Agricultural Economics Society, Dublin

  28. Rani A (2014) Consumption of chemical fertilisers in Haryana: an empirical study. ZENITH Int J Bus Econ Manag Res 4:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  29. Roscoe JT (1975) Fundamental research statistics for the behavioural sciences. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Saweda LO, Tasie L (2014) Fertiliser subsidies and private market participation: the case of Kano State, Nigeria. Agric Econ 45:663–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schreinemachers P, Berger T, Aune JB (2007) Simulating soil fertility and poverty dynamics in Uganda: a bio-economic multi-agent systems approach. Ecol Econ 64:387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sekaran U (2003) Research methods for business: a skill-building approach. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sharma VP, Thaker H (2011) Demand for fertiliser in India: determinants and outlook for 2020. W.P. No. 2011-04-01. Indian Institute of Management

  34. Sheahan M, Black R, Jayne TS (2013) Are Kenyan farmers under-utilizing fertiliser? Implications for input intensification strategies and research. Food Policy 41:39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh H, Solanki RS (2014) Factors influencing the use of fertilisers in agriculture of Madhya Pradesh in India. Int J Sci Res Math Stat Sci 1:18–40

    Google Scholar 

  36. Takeshima H, Nkonya E (2014) Government fertiliser subsidy and commercial sector fertiliser demand: evidence from the Federal Market Stabilization Program (FMSP) in Nigeria. Food Policy 47:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Varma A, Bakshi M, Lou B, Hartmann A, Oelmueller R (2012) Piriformospora indica: a novel plant growth-promoting Mycorrhizal fungus. Agric Res 1:117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wakeyo MB, Gardebroek C (2013) Does water harvesting induce fertiliser use among smallholders? Evidence from Ethiopia. Agric Syst 114:54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wooldridge JM (2012) Introductory econometrics. South-Western Publishers, Mason

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the editor in chief (Agricultural Research Journal) Dr. Anupam Varma and the anonymous reviewers for improving the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abubakar Hamid Danlami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Danlami, A.H., Applanaidu, SD. & Islam, R. A Microlevel Analysis of the Adoption and Efficiency of Modern Farm Inputs Use in Rural Areas of Kano State, Nigeria. Agric Res 8, 392–402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-018-0373-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-018-0373-z

Keywords

Navigation