Agricultural Research

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 245–249 | Cite as

Effect of Seasons on Subsequent Production Behavior of Small Size Potato Mini-tubers

  • Ashwani K. Sharma
  • Tanuja Buckseth
  • R. K. Singh
BRIEF Research Article


For the effective utilization of healthy and precious planting material, one-time multiplication of extremely small mini-tubers of potato under protected conditions is an alternative option to improve the size of progeny tubers for making them suitable for field multiplication. With this objective, the extremely small potato mini-tubers, viz. < 1, 1–2 and 2–3 g, produced during Kharif and autumn seasons were evaluated for their production behavior and health status under polyhouse (aphid proof) conditions of northwestern India (2700 m above mean sea level) during 2012 and 2013. The study revealed that mini-tubers produced during both the seasons had almost similar production potential and can be multiplied simultaneously without any special treatment. The number of tubers/m2 was more with mini-tubers grown in Kharif season than the autumn ones, but the yield was similar with the mini-tubers from both the seasons. However, plant vigor, number of tubers and yield were significantly affected by the grade of mini-tubers. The ELISA test of 5% plants raised from the mini-tubers from both the seasons revealed 100% healthy stocks in all the grades of mini-tubers.


Mini-tubers Ground cover Haulms Season 



The authors are grateful to the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India, for providing financial supports and necessary facilities to carry out research work.


  1. 1.
    Dua VK, Bhargawa R (2002) Effect of physiological age of seed tubers on growth and yield of potato. In: Paul Khurana SM et al (eds) Potato global research and development, vol II. Indian Potato Association, Shimla, pp 1139–1143Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ezekiel R (2004) Effect of physiological age of potato seed tubers on sprout and plant growth characteristics. Potato J 31(1–2):77–80Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ezekiel R (2000) Influence of physiological age of seed potatoes on crop growth and yield. Indian J Plant Physiol 5(4):314–319Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ezekiel R (1994) Effect of physiological age of seed tubers on sprout growth and yield of potato. In: Shekhawat GS (ed) Potato: present and future. Indian Potato Association, Shimla, pp 265–269Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Wiley, New York, p 680Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Patel CK, Patel PT, Chaudhari SM (2008) Effect of physiological age and seed size on seed production of potato in north Gujarat. Potato J 35(1–2):85–87Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rafique T, Jaskani MJ, Raza H, Abbas M (2004) In vitro studies on microtuber induction in potato. Int J Agric Biol 6(2):375–377Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rana RK, Sharma N, Arya S, Kadian MS, Singh BP (2013) Seed potato utilization pattern and its impact on farmer’s profitability in Karnataka. Indian J Agric Res 47(6):488–495Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharma AK, Venkatasalam EP, Singh RK (2011) Micro-tuberproduction behaviour of some commercially important potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars. Indian J Agric Sci 81(11):1008–1013Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sharma AK, Venkatasalam EP, Kumar V (2013) Potato mini-tuber production during main and off crop seasons in high hills of north-western Himalaya. Potato J 40(1):29–37Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sharma AK, Kumar V, Pandey KK (2013) Effect of intra-row spacing on the production behaviour of potato mini-tubers under protected conditions. Potato J 40(2):173–175Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singh SP, Kushwah VS (2010) Effect of size of seed tubers and date of haulm cuttings on production of small seed tubers. Potato J 37(3–4):167–170Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wiersema SG (1989) Comparative performance of three small seed tuber sizes and standard size seed tubers planted at similar stem densities. Potato Res 32:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© NAAS (National Academy of Agricultural Sciences) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashwani K. Sharma
    • 1
  • Tanuja Buckseth
    • 2
  • R. K. Singh
    • 2
  1. 1.ICAR-Central Potato Research StationKufriIndia
  2. 2.ICAR-Central Potato Research InstituteShimlaIndia

Personalised recommendations