Advertisement

Agricultural Research

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 129–134 | Cite as

Assessing Breeding Potential of Three-Way Cross and Double-Cross Hybrids in Chilli (Capsicum annuum)

  • T. Lakshmi Pathy
  • A. Mohan Rao
  • S. Ramesh
Full-Length Research Article

Abstract

Assessing breeding potential of multi-parent crosses is essential in order to isolate inbreds with broad genetic base. Five parental lines of chilli were used to produce ten single-cross hybrids in diallel design. These ten single crosses were in turn used to produce 15 double-cross hybrids and 30 three-way cross hybrids. The breeding potential of these three-way cross and double-cross hybrids was assessed for fruit yield per plant in terms of quantitative traits means, variances and their ability to produce transgressive segregants. Rank sums were also calculated based on individual means and variance. The hybrids which showed better values for all these parameters were compared and inferred that (Byadagikaddi × Gouribidanur) × (CCA 9907-9611 × Tiwari) and (CCA 9907-9611 × Tiwari) × PBC 483 have highest breeding potential and hence can be utilized for further improvement.

Keywords

Capsicum annuum Double-cross hybrids Three-way cross hybrids Breeding potential Transgressive segregants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) for providing financial assistance through Junior Research Fellowship (JRF).

References

  1. 1.
    Chahal GS, Gosal SS (2002) Principles and procedures of plant breeding. Narosa Publishing House, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choo TM, Kotecha A, Reinbergs E, Song LSP, Fejer SO (1986) Diallel analysis of grain yield in barley using doubled haploid lines. Plant Breed 97:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fasoulas A (1981) Principles and methods of plant breeding. Publication no. 11. Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Aristellian University of Thessaloniki, ThessalonikiGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khan R, Dubey RB (2015) Combining ability analysis for nutritional quality and yield in maize (Zea mays L.). The Bioscan 10(2):785–788Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krishnappa M, Ramesh S, Chandraprakash J, Jayarame G, Doss DD (2009) Breeding potential of selected crosses for genetic improvement of finger millet. J SAT Agric Res 7:1–6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lakshmi Pathy T, Mohan Rao A, Ramesh S (2016) Heterosis and combining ability studies in Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) by diallel Analysis. Adv Life Sci 5(21):9778–9780Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reddy MK, Srivastava A, Kumar S, Kumar R, Chawda N, Ebert AW, Vishwakarma M (2014) Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) breeding in India: an overview. SABRAO J Breed Genet 46:160–173Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roy D (2000) Plant breeding—analysis and exploitation of variation. Narosa Publishing House, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    White-house RNH (1969) An application of canonical analysis to plant breeding. Genet Agrar 23:61–69Google Scholar

Copyright information

© NAAS (National Academy of Agricultural Sciences) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Genetics and Plant BreedingUAS BangaloreBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding InstituteCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations