Klare Grenzwerte fehlen

Blutdruckvariabilität und kardiovaskuläres Risiko

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Literatur

  1. 1.

    Palatini P et al. Short-term blood pressure variability outweighs average 24-h blood pressure in the prediction of cardiovascular events in hypertension of the young. J Hypertens. 2019;37:1419-26

  2. 2.

    Mancia G, Verdecchia P. Clinical value of ambulatory blood pressure: evidence and limits. Circ Res. 2015;116:1034-45

  3. 3.

    Salles GF et al. Prognostic Effect of the Nocturnal Blood Pressure Fall in Hypertensive Patients: The Ambulatory Blood Pressure Collaboration in Patients With Hypertension (ABC-H) Meta-Analysis. Hypertension. 2016;67:693-700

  4. 4.

    Hermida RC et al. Influence of circadian time of hypertension treatment on cardiovascular risk: results of the MAPEC study. Chronobiol Int. 2010;27:1629-51

  5. 5.

    Hermida RC et al. Hypertension: New perspective on its definition and clinical management by bedtime therapy substantially reduces cardiovascular disease risk. Eur J Clin Invest. 2018;48: e12909

  6. 6.

    Zhang Y et al. Effect of antihypertensive agents on blood pressure variability: the Natrilix SR versus candesartan and amlodipine in the reduction of systolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients (X-CELLENT) study. Hypertension. 2011;58:155-60

  7. 7.

    Parati G et al. Impact of antihypertensive combination and monotreatments on blood pressure variability: assessment by old and new indices. Data from a large ambulatory blood pressure monitoring database. J Hypertens. 2014;32:1326-33

  8. 8.

    Parati G et al. Evaluating 24-h antihypertensive efficacy by the smoothness index: a meta-analysis of an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring database. J Hypertens. 2010;28:2177-83

  9. 9.

    Maseli A et al. Healthy Lifestyle and Blood Pressure Variability in Young Adults. Am J Hypertens. 2017;30:690-9

  10. 10.

    Rothwell PM et al. Effects of beta blockers and calcium-channel blockers on within-individual variability in blood pressure and risk of stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:469-80

  11. 11.

    Nishioka R, et al. Evaluation of the Differences in the Effects of Antihypertensive Drugs on Blood Pressure Variability by 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Chronic Cerebrovascular Disease. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24:1848-54

  12. 12.

    Asayama K et al. Hypertensive Objective Treatment Based on Measurement by Electrical Devices of Blood Pressure Study, Does Antihypertensive Drug Class Affect Day-to-Day Variability of Self-Measured Home Blood Pressure? The HOMED-BP Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e002995

  13. 13.

    Matsui Y et al. Combined effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker and either a calcium channel blocker or diuretic on day-by-day variability of home blood pressure: the Japan Combined Treatment With Olmesartan and a Calcium-Channel Blocker Versus Olmesartan and Diuretics Randomized Efficacy Study. Hypertension. 2012;59:1132-8

  14. 14.

    Kronish IM et al. The Association Between Antihypertensive Medication Nonadherence and Visit-to-Visit Variability of Blood Pressure: Findings From the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. Hypertension. 2016;68:39-45

  15. 15.

    Rothwell PM et al. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet. 2010;375:895-905

  16. 16.

    Muntner P et al. Effect of chlorthalidone, amlodipine, and lisinopril on visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure: results from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014;16:323-30

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dr. med. Alexander Reshetnik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reshetnik, A. Blutdruckvariabilität und kardiovaskuläres Risiko. CV 21, 33–34 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15027-020-3447-3

Download citation