Skip to main content
Log in

Der pädiatrische Notfall im klinischen Alltag

Ist viel immer auch mehr?

  • Fortbildung
  • Published:
Pädiatrie Aims and scope

Pädiatrische Notfallsituationen sind im klinischen Alltag selten, erfordern aber stets ein sehr rasches und zielgerichtetes Handeln eines interprofessionellen und manchmal auch interdisziplinären Teams. Neben den fachlichen Kompetenzen der Teammitglieder ist effektive Kommunikation der wichtigste Faktor, der zu einer guten Teamperformance und damit zu einer gelungenen Notfallversorgung führt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Suresh G et al. Voluntary anonymous reporting of medical errors for neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics 2004; 113:1609–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hunt EA et al. Simulation of inhospital pediatric medical emergencies and cardiopulmonary arrests: Highlighting the importance of the first 5 minutes. Pediatrics 2008; 121:e34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. St Pierre M. Do residents and nurses communicate safety relevant concerns? Simulation study on the influence of the authority gradient. Anaesthesist 2012; 61:857–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmutz JB, Eppich WJ. Promoting learning and patient care through shared reflection: a conceptual framework for team reflexivity in health care. Acad Med 2017 Apr 25

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rall M et al. The “10-seconds-for-10-minutes principle” — Why things go wrong and stopping them getting worse. Bulletin of The Royal College of Anaesthetist Special human factors issue. 2008; 2614–6

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kessler DO et al. Debriefing in the emergency department after clinical events: a practical guide. Ann Emerg Med 2014; 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kolbe M et al. Speaking up is related to better team performance in simulated anesthesia inductions: an observational study. Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation 2012; 115:1099–108

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Okuyama A et al. Speaking up for patient safety by hospital-based health care professionals: a literature review. BMC Health Services Research 2014;14:61

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Eddy K et al. Health professionals’ experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2016;14:96–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heimberg E et al. Typische Probleme bei Kindernotfällen — Mögliche Lösungsstrategien. Med Klin Intensivm Notfmed 2015; 110:354–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rall M et al. Erhöhung der Patientensicherheit durch effektive Incident Reporting Systeme am Beispiel von PaSIS. In: Ennker J (Hrsg): Risikomanagement in der operativen Medizin. Steinkopf, Darmstadt 2007; 122–37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Madsen MD et al. The attitude of doctors and nurses towards reporting and handling errors and adverse events. Ugeskrift for laeger 2006;168:4195–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Interessenkonflikt

Die Autoren erklären, dass bei der Erstellung des Beitrags kein Interessenkonflikt vorlag.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paulun, A., Heimberg, E. Ist viel immer auch mehr?. Pädiatrie 29 (Suppl 1), 22–25 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15014-017-1126-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15014-017-1126-3

Navigation