Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Übersicht zur Studienlage banderhaltender Eingriffe

VKB-Ruptur: Kann das vordere Kreuzband durch Naht erhalten werden?

  • Fortbildung
  • Published:
Orthopädie & Rheuma Aims and scope

In den vergangenen Jahren ist zur Behandlung eines rupturierten vorderen Kreuzbandes (VKB) die Kreuzbandnaht und somit der Erhalt des Ligaments im Gegensatz zur VKB-Plastik erneut in den Fokus geraten. Diese Arbeit vermittelt einen aktuellen Überblick über den Entwicklungsstand diverser VKB-erhaltender Operationsverfahren sowie deren experimentelle und klinische Studienlage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Achtnich A, Herbst E, Forkel P, Metzlaff S, Sprenker F, Imhoff AB, Petersen W (2016) Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: Outcomes After Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Repair Versus Anatomic SingleBundle Reconstruction. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery 32:2562—2569

  2. Achtnich A, Rosslenbroich S, Beitzel K, Imhoff AB, Petersen W (2016) Arthroscopic refixation of acute proximal anterior cruciate ligament rupture using suture anchors. Oper Orthop Traumatol 29:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersen RB, Gormsen J (2010) Fibrin Dissolution in Synovial Fluid. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology 16:319–333

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA (2011) Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med 45:596–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ateschrang A, Ahmad SS, Stöckle U, Schroeter S, Schenk W, Ahrend MD (2017) Recovery of ACL function after dynamic intraligamentary stabilization is resultant to restoration of ACL integrity and scar tissue formation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:589–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ateschrang A, Schreiner AJ, Ahmad SS, Schröter S, Hirschmann MT, Körner D, Kohl S, Stöckle U, Ahrend MD (2018) Improved results of ACL primary repair in one-part tears with intact synovial coverage. Knee Surgery 26:589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DiFelice GS, Villegas C, Taylor S (2015) Anterior Cruciate Ligament Preservation: Early Results of a Novel Arthroscopic Technique for Suture Anchor Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery 31:2162–2171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Domnick C, Garcia P, Raschke MJ, Glasbrenner J, Lodde G, Fink C, Herbort M (2017) Trends and incidences of ligament-surgeries and osteotomies of the knee: an analysis of German inpatient records 2005—2013. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:989–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eggli S, Kohlhof H, Zumstein M, Henle P, Hartel M, Evangelopoulos DS, Bonel H, Kohl S (2014) Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization: novel technique for preserving the ruptured ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1215–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Evangelopoulos DS, Kohl S, Schwienbacher S, Gantenbein B, Exadaktylos A, Ahmad SS (2015) Collagen application reduces complication rates of mid-substance ACL tears treated with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization. - PubMed - NCBI. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Springer Berlin Heidelberg 1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. HARROLD AJ (1961) The defect of blood coagulation in joints. J. Clin. Pathol. BMJ Publishing Group 14:305–308

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Häberli J, Henle P, Acklin YP, Zderic I, Gueorguiev B (2016) Knee joint kinematics with dynamic augmentation of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair - a biomechanical study. J EXP ORTOP 3:2230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Henle P, Bieri KS, Brand M, Aghayev E, Bettfuehr J, Haeberli J, Kess M, Eggli S (2017) Patient and surgical characteristics that affect revision risk in dynamic intraligamentary stabilization of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 43:121

    Google Scholar 

  14. Henle P, Röder C, Perler G, Heitkemper S, Eggli S (2015) Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization (DIS) for treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament ruptures: case series experience of the first three years. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Herbort M, Michel P, Raschke MJ, Vogel N, Schulze M, Zoll A, Fink C, Petersen W, Domnick C (2016) Should the Ipsilateral Hamstrings Be Used for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Case of Medial Collateral Ligament Insufficiency? Biomechanical Investigation Regarding Dynamic Stabilization of the Medial Compartment by the Hamstring Muscles. Am J Sports Med 45:819–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoogeslag RAG, Brouwer RW, Huis in t Veld R, Stephen JM, Amis AA (2018) Dynamic augmentation restores anterior tibial translation in ACL suture repair: a biomechanical comparison of non-, static and dynamic augmentation techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:549

    Google Scholar 

  17. Iain C Anthony GM (2015) Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Revisited. Preliminary Results of Primary Repair with Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation: A Case Series. Orthop Muscul Syst 04

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kiapour AM, Fleming BC, Murray MM (2015) Biomechanical Outcomes of Bridge-enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Are Influenced by Sex in a Preclinical Model. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 473:2599–2608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kohl S, Evangelopoulos DS, Schar MO, Bieri K, Muller T, Ahmad SS (2016) Dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation: initial experience with treatment of acute ACL ruptures. Bone Joint J 98-B:793–798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kösters C, Herbort M, Schliemann B, Raschke MJ, Lenschow S (2015) Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization of the anterior cruciate ligament. Unfallchirurg 118:364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krismer AM, Gousopoulos L, Kohl S, Ateschrang A, Kohlhof H, Ahmad SS (2017) Factors influencing the success of anterior cruciate ligament repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation. Knee Surgery 25:3923–3928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lubowitz JH (2013) Anatomic ACL reconstruction produces greater graft length change during knee range-of-motion than transtibial technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1190–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marshall JL, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Reider B (1979) The anterior cruciate ligament: a technique of repair and reconstruction. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  24. Meister M, Koch J, Amsler F, Arnold MP, Hirschmann MT (2017) ACL suturing using dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation showing good clinical outcome but a high reoperation rate: a retrospective independent study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:655–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Murray MM, Fleming BC (2013) Use of a Bioactive Scaffold to Stimulate Anterior Cruciate Ligament Healing Also Minimizes Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis After Surgery. Am J Sports Med 41:1762–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Paessler HH, Deneke J, Dahners LE (1992) Augmented repair and early mobilization of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 20:667–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schliemann B, Herbort M, Lenschow S, Raschke MJ, Kösters C (2015) Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization of acute anterior cruciate ligament tears (Ligamys). Trauma Berufskrankh 18:254–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schliemann B, Lenschow S, Domnick C, Herbort M, Häberli J, Schulze M, Wähnert D, Raschke MJ, Kösters C (2015) Knee joint kinematics after dynamic intraligamentary stabilization: cadaveric study on a novel anterior cruciate ligament repair technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:1184–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. van der List JP, DiFelice GS (2017) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predicts eligibility for arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:660–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. van der List JP, DiFelice GS (2017) Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: A paradigm shift. The Surgeon 15:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vavken P, Fleming BC, Mastrangelo AN, Machan JT, Murray MM (2012) Biomechanical Outcomes After Bioenhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Are Equal in a Porcine Model. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery 28:672–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Weaver JK, Derkash RS, Freeman JR, Kirk RE, Oden RR, Matyas J (1985) Primary knee ligament repair—revisited. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 185–191

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. OCM — Orthopädische Chirurgie München, Steinerstraße 6, 81369, München, Deutschland

    Mirco Herbort

  2. http://www.springermedizin.de

    Johannes Glasbrenner, Christoph Domnick, Benedikt Schliemann, Christoph Kittl & Michael J. Raschke

Authors
  1. Mirco Herbort
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Johannes Glasbrenner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christoph Domnick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Benedikt Schliemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christoph Kittl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael J. Raschke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirco Herbort.

Additional information

Interessenkonflikt

Mirco Herbort ist Berater bei Medacta, Mathys, Conmed-Linvatec, DJO, Olympus. Benedikt Schliemann ist Berater bei Mathys.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herbort, M., Glasbrenner, J., Domnick, C. et al. VKB-Ruptur: Kann das vordere Kreuzband durch Naht erhalten werden?. Orthop. Rheuma 22, 30–35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15002-019-1562-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15002-019-1562-2

Search

Navigation