Abstract
Low-carbon cities have been the favorite subject of many societies with the aim of making a sustainable environment for life. The purpose of this study was to develop a conceptualized model of low-carbon city with a sustainable approach by applying life-cycle cost analysis as the methodology with secondary data from Iranian national report to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. This study attempts to examine the factors affecting the production and increase in carbon emission in urban areas and also provides some solutions to solve these problems and create low-carbon urban areas in order to promote environmental quality with a sustainable development approach. Then, some tools and methods are developed to improve the analytical rigor associated with climate action plans. With a focus on non-behavioral items, the cost and effectiveness of more than 30 action items are quantified. Finally, the scenario analysis was used to evaluate the cost and efficiency of various program designs. Results indicate that greenhouse gases mitigation takes remarkable initial investments. This cost differs from $1 to $70 M for each percent of reduction depending on scale and scope of the program. However, long-term cost savings are considerable if the program is properly designed, with the 20-year return period for different climate action plans, exceeding 100%.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Abbreviations
- CTS:
-
Cost per ton of carbon saved ($/tCO2)
- LCS:
-
Lifetime carbon saved (tCO2)
- NPV:
-
Net present value ($)
- eCO2 :
-
Embodied CO2 emission (ton)
- Mcf:
-
Thousand cubic feet of natural gas
- C :
-
Annualized costs ($/year)
- r :
-
Discount rate (%)
- n :
-
Lifespan (years)
References
Amado M, Poggi F, Amado AR (2016) Energy efficient city: a model for urban planning. Sustain Cities Soc 26:476–485
Calvin K, Clarke L, Krey V, Blanford G, Jiang K, Kainuma M, Kriegler E, Luderer G, Shukla PR (2012) The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: results from the Asia modeling exercise. Energy Econ 34:S251–S260
Cheshmehzangi A (2016) Feasibility study of Songao’s low carbon town planning, China. Energy Procedia 88:313–320
European Commission (2011) Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, cities of tomorrow. Challenges, visions, ways forward. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/citiesoftomorrow/citiesoftomorrow_final.pdf
IPCC (2011) Special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srren/SRREN_FD_SPM_final.pdf
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014 mitigation of climate change (Working Group III contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change). https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_full.pdf
ISO (2003) Task Group 4: life cycle costs in construction. http://onlinebookshop.villareal.fi/docs/LifeCycleCostsinConstruction.pdf
Kainuma M, Shukla PR, Jiang K (2012) Framing and modeling of a low carbon society: an overview. Energy Econ 34:S316–S324
Lovaas D (2004) Suburbanization and energy. Energy 5:765–776
Maier S (2016) Smart energy systems for smart city districts: case study Reininghaus district. Energy Sustain Soc 6(1):23
Marique AF, Reiter S (2014) A simplified framework to assess the feasibility of zero-energy at the neighbourhood/community scale. Energy Build 82:114–122
Neroutsou TI, Croxford B (2016) Lifecycle costing of low energy housing refurbishment: a case study of a 7 year retrofit in Chester Road, London. Energy Build 128:178–189
O’Toole R (2008) Does rail transit save energy or reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Cato Policy Anal (615). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1263426
Schanes K, Giljum S, Hertwich E (2016) Low carbon lifestyles: a framework to structure consumption strategies and options to reduce carbon footprints. J Clean Prod 139:1033–1043
Shammin MR, Herendeen RA, Hanson MJ, Wilson EJ (2010) A multivariate analysis of the energy intensity of sprawl versus compact living in the US for 2003. Ecol Econ 69(12):2363–2373
Skea J, Nishioka S (2008) Policies and practices for a low-carbon society. Clim Policy 8(sup1):S5–S16
UNFCCC (2003) Iran’s Initial National Communication to UNFCCC. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/iranc1.pdf
UNFCCC (2010) Iran’s Secound National Communication to UNFCCC. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/iranc2.pdf
Acknowledgements
All organizations and specialists which helped to prepare this study with their guidance are thanked.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Zhenyao Shen.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mollaei, S., Amidpour, M. & Sharifi, M. Analysis and development of conceptual model of low-carbon city with a sustainable approach. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 6019–6028 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1989-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1989-z