Skip to main content
Log in

Biological leachate treatment using anaerobic/aerobic process: suspended growth-activated sludge versus aerobic granular sludge

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landfill leachate treatment was investigated using two anaerobic/aerobic sequencing batch reactors inoculated with suspended growth-activated sludge (ASBR) and aerobic granular sludge (GSBR). The total ammonium nitrogen (TAN) concentration in the GSBR influent was as high as 1200 mg/L with an average TAN removal efficiency of 99.7%. However, the ASBR treatment did not show a consistent performance in TAN removal. The TAN removal efficiency decreased with increasing ammonium concentration in the influent. Aerobic granular sludge was found to be more resistant to free ammonia (FA). In the GSBR, nitrification was partially inhibited at FA concentration from 48 to 57 mg/L, which was two times more than the FA concentration that inhibited nitrification in the ASBR. Low chemical oxygen demand removal efficiencies were obtained in both reactors, which was associated with the refractory organic content of the leachate used in this study. This resulted in poor phosphorous removal in both treatments. The results prove that aerobic granular sludge is a robust method as compared to suspended-activated sludge to treat leachate containing high levels of TAN and FA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbas AA, Jingsong G, Ping LZ, Ya PY, Al-Rekabi WS (2009) Review on landfill leachate treatments. J Appl Sci Res 5(5):534–545

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adav SS, Lee DJ (2008) Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances from aerobic granule with compact interior structure. J Hazard Mater 154:1120–1126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anthonisen AC, Loehr RC, Prakasam TB, Srinath EG (1976) Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid. J Water Pollut Control Fed 48:835–852

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz HA, Zahari MSM, Adlan MN, Hung YT (2012) Physicochemical treatment processes of landfill leachate. In: Hung YT, Wang LK, Shammas NK (eds) Handbook of environment and waste management: air and water pollution control. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, pp 819–888

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Campos R, Ferraz FM, Vieira EM, Povinelli J (2014) Aerobic co-treatment of landfill leachate and domestic wastewater—are slowly biodegradable organics removed or simply diluted? Water Sci Technol 70(12):1941–1947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Contrera R, Sarti A, De Castro MCA, Foresti E, Zaiat M, Schalch V (2013) Ethanol addition as a strategy for start-up and acclimation of an AnSBBR for the treatment of landfill leachate. Proc Biochem 48(11):1767–1777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Kreuk MK, De Bruin LMM, Van Loosdrecht MCM (2005) Aerobic granular sludge: from idea to pilot plant. In: Bathe S, De Kreuk M, McSwain B, Schwarzenbeck N (eds) Aerobic granular sludge. IWA Publishing, London, pp 111–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28(3):350–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EI-Korashy SA, Elwakeel KZ, El-Hafeiz AA (2016) Fabrication of bentonite/thiourea-formaldehyde composite material for Pb(II), Mn(VII) and Cr(VI) sorption: a combined basic study and industrial application. J Clean Prod 137:40–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwakeel KZ, Guibal E (2016) Potential use of magnetic glycidyl methacrylate resin as a mercury sorbent: from basic study to the application to wastewater treatment. J Environ Chem Eng 4:3632–3645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz FM, Bruni AT, Povinelli J, Vieira EM (2016) Leachate/domestic wastewater aerobic cotreatment: a pilot-scale study using multivariate analysis. J Environ Manag 166:414–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ford DL, Churchwell RL, Kachtick JW (1980) Comprehensive analysis of nitrification of chemical processing wastewaters. J Water Pollut Control Fed 52(11):2726–2746

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frølund B, Palmgren R, Keiding K, Nielsen PH (1996) Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin. Water Res 30(8):1749–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabarró J, Ganigué R, Gich F, Ruscalleda M, Balaguer MD, Colprim J (2012) Effect of temperature on AOB activity of a partial nitritation SBR treating landfill leachate with extremely high nitrogen concentration. Biores Technol 126:283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyik AG, Çeçen F (2016) Production of protein-and carbohydrate-EPS in activated sludge reactors operated at different carbon to nitrogen ratios. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 91(2):522–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giesen A, De Bruin LMM, Niermans RP, Van der Roest HF (2013) Advancements in the application of aerobic granular biomass technology for sustainable treatment of wastewater. Water Pract Technol 8(1):wpt.2013007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldsen P, Barlaz MA, Rooker AP, Baun A, Ledin A, Christensen TH (2002) Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 32:297–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lashkarizadeh M, Yuan Q, Oleszkiewicz JA (2015) Influence of carbon source on nutrient removal performance and physical–chemical characteristics of aerobic granular sludge. Environ Technol 36(17):2161–2167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YM, Wang L, Chi ZM, Liu XY (2008) Bacterial alginate role in aerobic granular bio-particles formation and settleability improvement. Sep Sci Technol 43(7):1642–1652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Wu W, Shi P, Guo J, Cheng J (2015) Characterization of dissolved organic matter in landfill leachate during the combined treatment process of air stripping, Fenton, SBR and coagulation. Waste Manag 41:111–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lotito AM, Fratino U, Mancini A, Bergna G, Di Iaconi C (2012) Effective aerobic granular sludge treatment of a real dyeing textile wastewater. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 69:62–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McSwain BS, Irvine RL, Hausner M, Wilderer PA (2005) Composition and distribution of extracellular polymeric substances in aerobic flocs and granular sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(2):1051–1057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moussavi G, Barikbin B, Mahmoudi M (2010) The removal of high concentrations of phenol from saline wastewater using aerobic granular SBR. Chem Eng J 158:498–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ni B-J, Xie W-M, Liu S-G, Yu H-Q, Wang Y-Z, Wang G, Dai X-L (2009) Granulation of activated sludge in a pilot-scale sequencing batch reactor for the treatment of low-strength municipal wastewater. Water Res 43:751–761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pronk M, De Kreuk MK, De Bruin B, Kamminga P, Kleerebezem R, van Loosdrecht MCM (2015) Full scale performance of the aerobic granular sludge process for sewage treatment. Water Res 84:207–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos C, Suárez-Ojeda ME, Carrera J (2015) Long-term impact of salinity on the performance and microbial population of an aerobic granular reactor treating a high-strength aromatic wastewater. Biores Technol 198:844–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renou S, Givaudan JG, Poulain S, Dirassouyan F, Moulin P (2008) Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity. J Hazard Mater 150:468–493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saito T, Brdjanovic D, van Loosdrecht MCM (2004) Effect of nitrite on phosphate uptake by phosphate accumulating organisms. Water Res 38:3760–3768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salama Y, Chennaoui M, Sylla A, Mountadar M, Rihani M, Assobhei O (2016) Characterization, structure, and function of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of microbial biofilm in biological wastewater treatment systems: a review. Desalin Water Treat 57:16220–16237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seviour T, Lambert LK, Pijuan M, Yuan Z (2010) Structural determination of a key exopolysaccharide in mixed culture aerobic sludge granules using NMR spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 44(23):8964–8970

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Peng Y, Wang S, Ma J (2015) Achieving nitritation at low temperatures using free ammonia inhibition on nitrobacter and real-time control in an SBR treating landfill leachate. J Environ Sci 30:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water and Waste Department–Environmental Standards Division (2016) Brady Road Resource Management Facility Annual Report-2016. http://www.winnipeg.ca/waterandwaste/pdfs/garbage/reports/BRRMF/2016_annual_report.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2017

  • Wei Y, Ji M, Li R, Qin F (2012) Organic and nitrogen removal from landfill leachate in aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactors. Waste Manag 32:448–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Zhou S, Qin F, Peng H, Lai Y, Lin Y (2010) Removal of humic substances from landfill leachate by Fenton oxidation and coagulation. Process Saf Environ Protect 88:276–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan L, Liu Y, Wen Y, Ren Y, Hao G, Zhang Y (2015) Role and significance of extracellular polymeric substances from granular sludge for simultaneous removal of organic matter and ammonia nitrogen. Biores Technol 179:460–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang SF, Tay JH, Liu Y (2004) Inhibition of free-ammonia to the formation of aerobic granules. Biochem Eng J 17:41–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Q, Jia H, Poveda M (2016) Study on the effect of landfill leachate on nutrient removal from municipal wastewater. J Environ Sci 43:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Feng X, Zhu N, Chen J (2007) Role of extracellular protein in the formation and stability of aerobic granules. Enzyme Microb Technol 41:551–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Oehmen A, Lim M, Vadivelu V, Ng WJ (2011) The role of nitrite and free nitrous acid (FNA) in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 45:4672–4682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L, Lv ML, Dai X, Yu YW, Qi HY, Xu XY (2012) Role and significance of extracellular polymeric substances on the property of aerobic granule. Biores Technol 107:46–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu R, Wang S, Li J, Wang K, Miao L, Ma B, Peng Y (2013) Biological nitrogen removal from landfill leachate using anaerobic-aerobic process: denitritation via organics in raw leachate and intracellular storage polymers of microorganisms. Biores Technol 128:401–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is financially supported by National Science and Engineering Research Council (Grant No. RGPIN-2014-05510). The authors would like to thank CNPq-Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (Grant No. 203208/2014-5) for a postdoctoral scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Q. Yuan.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: M. Borghei.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, Y., M. Ferraz, F. & Yuan, Q. Biological leachate treatment using anaerobic/aerobic process: suspended growth-activated sludge versus aerobic granular sludge. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15, 2295–2302 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1633-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1633-3

Keywords

Navigation