Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimized scheduling for electric lift trucks in a sugarcane agro-industry based on thermal, biomass and solar resources

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Resource scheduling for both cost and pollution minimization in the power system is so crucial. To reduce the greenhouse gas emission, employing renewable energy resources, especially solar and wind energy, and beside them plug-in hybrid electric vehicles are effective solutions. In industrial factories, using biomass resources for power generation is both economic and environmental approach. In sugarcane company, bagasse is plant fiber residue which is used as fuel. Electric lift trucks, capable of being connected to power grid, could decrease the pollution in industrial transportations. In this paper, scheduling problem for a large-scale sugarcane factory including solar resources, a thermal unit, and electric lift trucks is presented and solved by CPLEX solver in GAMS software. In order to consider uncertainties, different scenarios are noticed. To contribute better understanding of optimization problem, cost, pollution, and charging regime of electric lift trucks are carefully analyzed. The results show that implementation of the biomass electric power generation is effective for reducing cost and amount of emission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Green House Gas.

Abbreviations

\(\psi_{\hbox{min} } /\psi_{\hbox{max} }\) :

Min/max. State of charge

\(I_{i} \left( t \right)\) :

Status of unit i at hour t

\(I_{\text{ch}} \left( t \right)\) :

Charging status of lift trucks at time t (if \(I_{\text{ch}} \left( t \right) = 1\), then lift trucks are in charge mode)

I dch(t):

Discharging status of lift trucks at time t (if it equals to one, lift trucks are in discharge mode)

\(N_{\text{LF}} \left( t \right)\) :

Number of electric lift trucks connected to the grid at time t

n :

Number of all electric vehicles in investigated place

α i , β i , γ i :

Emission coefficients of unit i

a i , b i , c i :

Cost coefficients of unit i

I :

If it equals to one, the unit is thermal power plant and if it equals to two, the unit is biomass resource

H :

Scheduling hours

S :

Sets of scenario

η :

Efficiency of batteries

w c :

Weight factor for cost

w e :

Weight factor for emission

\({\text{fc}}_{i} ()\) :

Fuel cost function of unit i

\({\text{Sc}}_{i} ()\) :

Start-up cost function of unit i

\({\text{fe}}_{i} ()\) :

Emission function of unit i

D(t):

Load demand at time t

pfe i :

Emission penalty factor of unit i

P ssolar (t):

Power of solar farm at time t considering scenario s

P LF :

Capacity of the electric lift truck’s batteries

P sLF (t):

Power of the electric lift trucks at time t considering scenario s

R :

Efficiency of the battery

\(E^{S} \left( t \right)\) :

Total energy of all batteries at time t considering scenario s

\(E_{\text{F}}\) :

Energy of battery at final hour of day

\(E_{0}\) :

Primary energy of battery at starting time for scheduling

\(E_{\hbox{min} } ,E_{\hbox{max} }\) :

Maximum and minimum energy of battery

P sch (t):

Charging power of all plug-in lift trucks at time t considering scenario s

\(P_{\text{dch}}^{s} \left( t \right)\) :

Discharging power of all plug-in lift trucks at time t considering scenario s

\(i1_{\text{ch}} \left( t \right), i1_{\text{dch}} \left( t \right)\) :

Status of charging and discharging plug-in lift trucks

Randn:

A random number between 0 and 1 in normal probability distributed curve

P s i (t):

Power of unit i at time t considering scenario s

P max i , P min i :

Max/min output limit of unit i

p pv :

Output power of solar panel

p pv-r :

Rated output power of PV array

F pv :

De-rating factor considering shading, wiring, etc.

G :

Solar radiation in current time

G stc :

Solar radiation under the standard test condition

α T :

Temperature coefficient of power

T stc :

Temperature on PV cells under standard test condition

References

  • Abbaspour M, Kahdivi S (2009) Challenges of green management in Iran. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 120:547–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbaspour M, Satkin M, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Noorollahi Y (2013) Optimal scheduling of wind power integrated with compressed air energy storage (CAES). J Renew Energy 51:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alipour S, Karbassi AR, Abbaspour M, Moharamnejad N (2011) Energy and environmental issues in transport sector. J Environ Res 5(1):213–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Allbardli J, Ensians AV, Silva MA (2012) Combined first and second generation ethanol production: analysis of supercritical hydrolysis. Conf Pap Process Integr 29:204–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Alrafea K, Elkamel A, Abdul-Wahab SA (2016) Cost-analysis of health impacts associated with emissions from combined-cycle power plants. J Clean Prod 139:1408–1424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atabi F (2004) Renewable energy in Iran; challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. Int J Sci Environ Techn IJEST 1(1):55–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Dias MOS, Cavalett O, Filho RM, Bonomi A (2014) Integrated first and second generation ethanol production from sugarcane. J AIDIC Chem Eng Trans 37:445–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholami A, Ansari J, Jamei M, Kazemi A (2014) Environmental/economic dispatch incorporating renewable energy sources and plug-in vehicles. IET Gener J Transm Distrib 8(12):2183–2198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafez O, Bhattacharya K (2012) Optimal planning and design of a renewable energy based supply system for microgrids. J Renew Energy 45:7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haghshenas M, Falaghi H (2016) Environmental/economic operation management of a renewable microgrid with wind/PV/FC/MT and battery energy storage based on MSFLA. J Electr Syst 12(1):85–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoglund PG, Niittymaki J (1999) Estimating vehicle emissions and air pollution related to driving patterns and traffic calming. Conf Urban Transp Syst 1(10)

  • Jamali S (2002) Optimized using the energy in sugarcane agro-industry companies. J Iran Energy 15:3–17 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kargari N, Mosturi R (2008) Comparing GHG emissions in different types of power places by using LCA approach. J Iran Energy 13(2):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Macedo IC, Seabra JEA, Silva JEAR (2008) Greenhouse gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: the 2005/2006 average and a prediction for 2020. J Biomass Bioenergy 32:582–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madawala UK, Schweizer P, Haerri VV (2008) Living and mobility: a novel multipurpose in-house grid interface with plug-in hybrid blue angle. In: IEEE ICSET, pp 531–536

  • Michaelis L (1995) The abatement of air pollution from motor vehicles; the role of alternate fuels. J Transp Econ Policy 29:71–84

  • Mohite JN, Barote SS (2015) Low cost vehicle pollution monitoring system. Int J Innov Res Comput Commun Eng 3(7):6521–6525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najafi G, Ghobadian B, Mamat R, Yusaf T, Azmi WH (2015) Solar energy in Iran: current state and outlook. J Renew Sustain Energy Rev 49:931–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanaki EA, Koroneos CJ (2013) Comparative economic and environmental analysis of conventional, hybrid and electric vehicles—the case study of Greece. J Clean Prod 53:261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Weather Service (NOAA). http://www.weather.gov

  • Nouri J, Karbassi AR, Mirkia S (2008) Environmental management of coastal regions in the Caspian Sea. Int J Sci Environ Technol IJEST 5(1):43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panwar NL, Kaushik SC, Kothari S (2011) Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: a review. J Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:1513–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saber A, Venayagamoorthy GK (2011a) Plug-in vehicles and renewable energy sources for cost and emission reductions. IEEE Trans Indu Electron 58(4):1229–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saber A, Venayagamoorthy GK (2011b) Resource scheduling under uncertainty in a smart grid with renewable and plug-in vehicles. J IEEE Syst 6(1):103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saikawa E, Kurokawa J, Takiyawa M, Borken-kleafeld J, Mauzeral DL, Horowitz LW, Ohan T (2011) The impact of China’s vehicle emissions on regional air quality in 2000 and 2020: a scenario analysis. J Atmos Chem Phys 11:9465–9484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi M (2015) Location of greenhouse gases emissions from thermal power plants in india along the urban–rural continuum. J Clean Prod 103:582–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiehbeigi A, Abbaspour M, Soltaniyeh M, Hosseinzadeh F, Abedi Z (2014) Evaluation of climate change and prediction of its importance on efficiency and fuel consumption of thermal power plants in Iran in next decade. Int J Sci Environ Technol IJEST 16:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Solar Energy Services for Professionals, SODA, solar radiation data. http://www.soda-is.com/eng/services

  • Twidell J, Weir T (2002) Renewable energy resources. J Taylor Francis Biomass Biofuels Part 351–400

  • Vasudevan S, Farooq Sh, Karimi IA, Agrawal R (2016) Energy penalty estimates for CO2 capture: comparison between fuel types and capture-combustion modes. J Energy 103:709–714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Quiceno R, Price C, Malpas R, Woods J (2014) Economic and GHG emissions analysis for sugarcane ethanol in Brazil: looking forward. J Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:573–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Tsang DHK, Qian LP, Meng L (2014) Optimal energy scheduling for residential smart grid with centralized renewable energy source. J IEEE Syst 8(2):562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu L, Ruan X, Ma Ch (2013) An improved optimal sizing method for wind–solar–battery hybrid power system. J IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 4:774–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Guo Y (2013) Process simulations of large-scale CO2 capture in coal-fired power plants using aqueous ammonia solution. Int J Greenh Gas Control 16:61–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu C, Tian H, Cheng K, Liu K, Wang K, Hua Sh, Gao J, Zhou J (2016) Potentials of whole process control of heavy metals emissions from coal-fired power plants in China. J Clean Prod 114:343–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Babak Mozafari, the dean of Electrical and computer faculty of science and research branch Islamic Azad University, for supporting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Faghihi.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Necip Atar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pashangpour, R., Faghihi, F. & Soleymani, S. Optimized scheduling for electric lift trucks in a sugarcane agro-industry based on thermal, biomass and solar resources. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15, 2349–2358 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1535-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1535-4

Keywords

Navigation