Advertisement

Assessing land-use and transport integration via a spatial composite indexing model

  • F. Dur
  • T. Yigitcanlar
Original Paper

Abstract

Achieving sustainable urban development is identified as one ultimate goal of many contemporary planning endeavours and has become central to formulation of urban planning policies. Within this concept, land-use and transport integration is highlighted as one of the most important and attainable policy objectives. In many cities, integration is embraced as an integral part of local development plans, and a number of key integration principles are identified. However, the lack of available evaluation methods to measure extent of urban sustainability levels prevents successful implementation of these principles. This paper introduces a new indicator-based spatial composite indexing model developed to measure sustainability performance of urban settings by taking into account land-use and transport integration principles. Model indicators are chosen via a thorough selection process in line with key principles of land-use and transport integration. These indicators are grouped into categories and themes according to their topical relevance. These indicators are then aggregated to form a spatial composite index to portray an overview of the sustainability performance of the pilot study area used for model demonstration. The study results revealed that the model is a practical instrument for evaluating success of local integration policies and visualizing sustainability performance of built environments and useful in both identifying problematic areas as well as formulating policy interventions.

Keywords

Land-use and transport integration Sustainable urban development Composite index Spatial indexing Indicator 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is an outcome of an Australian Research Council Linkage Project (ARC-LP0882637), jointly funded by the Commonwealth Government of Australia, Gold Coast City Council, Queensland Transport and Main Roads and Queensland University of Technology (QUT). The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of the project partners and research team, expert panel, and the financial support of QUT, School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment and Academic Strategic Transport Research Alliance (ASTRA). We also acknowledge and cordially thank the editor and four anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and insightful suggestions, which helped us to improve the manuscript.

References

  1. Allen E (2008) Clicking toward better outcomes. In: Brail R (ed) Planning support systems for cities and regions. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkisson A (1996) Developing indicators of sustainable community. Environ Impact Assess Rev 16(4–6):337–350Google Scholar
  3. Alshuwaikhat H, Aina Y (2006) GIS-based urban sustainability assessment. Local Environ 11(2):141–162Google Scholar
  4. Bandura R (2008) A survey of composite indices measuring country performance. UNDP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum S, Arthurson K, Rickson K (2010) Happy people in mixed-up places. Urban Stud 47(3):467–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhat C, Guo J (2007) A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transp Res Part B 41(5):506–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black J, Paez A, Suthanaya P (2002) Sustainable urban transportation. J Urban Plan Dev 128(1):184–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cervero R, Kockelman K (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds. Transp Res Part D 2(3):199–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Department of Infrastructure and Planning (DIP) (2009) South East Queensland Regional Plan 2009–2031. DIP, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  10. Dizdaroglu D, Yigitcanlar T, Dawes L (2012) A micro-level indexing model for assessing urban ecosystem sustainability. Smart Sustain Built Environ 1(3):291–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duvarci Y, Yigitcanlar T, Alver Y, Mizokami S (2011) The variant concept of transportation disadvantaged: evidence from Aydin, Turkey and Yamaga, Japan. J Urban Plan Dev-ASCE 137(1):82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ercolano S, Romano O (2011) Exploring environmental urban policies. University Library of Munich, Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  13. European Commission (EC) (2001) Towards a local sustainability profile. Office for Official Publications of the EC, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission (EC) (2004) Achieving sustainability in transport and land-use (ASTRAL). Office for Official Publications of the EC, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  15. European Environmental Agency (EEA) (2009) Indicators tracking transport and environment in the EU. EEA, Copenhagen Google Scholar
  16. Gasparatos A, El-Haram M, Horner M (2008) A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28(1):286–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilbert R, Tanguay H (2000) Sustainable transportation performance indicators project. Center for Sustainable Transportation, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  18. Gold Coast City Council (GCCC) (1998) Gold Coast City transport plan. GCCC, Gold CoastGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanafizadeh M, Saghaei A, Hanafizadeh P (2009) An index for cross-country analysis of ICT infrastructure and access. Telecommun Policy 33(1):385–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Handy S (2005) Smart growth and the transportation land-use connection. Int Reg Sci Rev 28(2):146–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Josza A, Brown D (2005) Neighborhood sustainability indicators. McGill University, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  22. Litman T (2007) Developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning. J Transp Res Board 2017:10–15Google Scholar
  23. Mackay M (2001) Which suburbs work?. Ministry of Planning, PerthGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahbub P, Goonetilleke A, Ayoko G, Egodawatta P, Yigitcanlar T (2011) Analysis of build-up of heavy metals and volatile organics on urban roads in Gold Coast. Aust Water Sci Technol 63(9):2077–2085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mameli F, Marletto G (2009) A selection of indicators for monitoring sustainable urban mobility policies. In: Marletto G, Musso E (eds) Trasporti, ambiente e territorio. La ricerca di un nuovo equilibrio. Franco Angeli, Milano, pp 167–174Google Scholar
  26. Maoh H, Kanaroglou P (2009) A tool for evaluating urban sustainability via integrated transportation and land use simulation models. Environ Urbain/Urban Environ 3(1):28–46Google Scholar
  27. Minken H, Jonsson D, Shepherd S, Järvi T, May T, Page M, Vold A (2003) Developing sustainable urban land-use and transport strategies. Institute for Transport Economics, OsloGoogle Scholar
  28. Nardo M, Paisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Hoffman A, Giovannini E (2008) Handbook on constructing composite indicators. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. Newton P, Flood J, Berry M, Bhatia K, Brown S, Cabelli A, Ritchie V (1998) Environmental indicators for national state of the environment reporting. Department of the Environment, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  30. OECD (2003) Organsation for Economic Co-operation and Dvelopment (OECD) environmental indicators. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  31. Rassafi A, Vaziri M (2005) Sustainable transport indicators: definition and integration. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2(1):83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ravetz J (2000) Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20(1):31–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Repetti A, Desthieux G (2006) A relational indicator set model for urban land-use planning and management. Landsc Urban Plan 77(1–2):196–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rydin Y, Holman N, Wolff E (2003) Local sustainability indicators. Local Environ 8(6):581–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S (2005) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. J R Stat Soc 168(2):307–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sessa C (2007) Achieving sustainable cities with integrated land-use and transport strategies. Land use and transport: European research towards integrated policies. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Singh R, Murty H, Gupta S, Dikshit A (2009) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Ind 9(1):189–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smart Growth Network and International City/County Management Association (SGN) (2002) Getting to Smart Growth: 100 policies for implementation. SGN, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  39. Stead D, Marshall S (2001) The relationships between urban form and travel patterns: an international review and evaluation. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 1(2):113–141Google Scholar
  40. Sustainable Measures (2010) Transportation, environment, land-use and recreation-accessibility measures. Sustainable Measures, West Hartford, CTGoogle Scholar
  41. Tanguay G, Rajaonson J, Lefebvre J, Lanoie P (2010) Measuring the sustainability of cities. Ecol Ind 10(2):407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van de Walle S, Steenberghen T, Paulley N, Pedler A, Martens M (2004) The role of indicators in the assessment of integrated land-use and transport policies in European cities. Int Plan Stud 9(2–3):173–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Witten K, Pearce J, Day P (2011) Neighbourhood destination accessibility index. Environ Plan A 43(1):205–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yigitcanlar T (ed) (2010a) Sustainable urban and regional infrastructure development: technologies, applications and management. IGI-Global, HerseyGoogle Scholar
  45. Yigitcanlar T (ed) (2010b) Rethinking sustainable development: urban management, engineering and design. IGI Global, HerseyGoogle Scholar
  46. Yigitcanlar T, Dur F (2010) Developing a sustainability assessment model. Sustainability 2(1):321–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yigitcanlar T, Dodson J, Gleeson B, Sipe N (2007) Travel self containment in master planned estates: analysis of recent Australian trends. Urban Policy Res 25(1):133–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yigitcanlar T, Fabian L, Coiacetto E (2008) Challenges to urban transport sustainability and smart transport in a tourist city: the Gold Coast. Open Transp J 2(1):29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environment and Sustainability BranchLogan City CouncilLogan CityAustralia
  2. 2.School of Civil Engineering and Built EnvironmentQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations