Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Search on Mars for a Second Genesis of Life in the Solar System and the Need for Biologically Reversible Exploration

  • Thematic Issue Article: Astrobiology
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The discovery of a second genesis of life besides the one on Earth, this time on Mars, would have profound scientific and philosophical implications. Scientifically, it would provide a second example of biochemistry and of evolutionary history. Many important biological questions may be answerable through the comparison of biochemistry between the life forms on the two planets. Philosophically, the discovery of a second genesis of life in our solar system would suggest that the phenomenon of life is distributed throughout the universe. We could finally be confident that we are not alone. To protect a second genesis as we search for it, the robotic and human exploration of Mars should be done in a way that is biologically reversible, i.e., we must be able to undo our contamination of Mars if we discover a second genesis of life there. It is important to note that human exploration can be done in a way that is biologically reversible. Further, the discovery of a second genesis of life on Mars poses new questions in ethics. One question is: what ethical consideration is due to an alien life form when that life is distinctly different from Earth life, and the members of that life are no more advanced than microorganisms? Will we choose to terraform Mars to enhance the richness and diversity of the indigenous life we find there? In considering our answers to these questions, we should note that for most of Earth’s history our ancestors were microscopic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barengoltz J (2005) A review of the approach of NASA projects to planetary protection compliance. In: Aerospace conference. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Piscataway, pp 253–261

  • Benardini III JN, La Duc MT, Beaudet RA, Koukol R (2014) Implementing planetary protection measures on the Mars Science Laboratory. Astrobiology 14:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr MH (1996) Water on Mars. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark BC (2001) Planetary interchange of bioactive material: probability factors and implications. Orig Life Evol Biosph 31:185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockell CS (2003) Impossible extinction: natural catastrophes and the supremacy of the microbial world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockell CS (2005) The value of microorganisms. Environ Ethics 27:375–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockell CS (2008) Environmental ethics and size. Ethics Environ 13:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davila AF, Schulze-Makuch D (2016) The last possible outposts for life on Mars. Astrobiology 16:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis WL, McKay CP (1996) Origins of life: a comparison of theories and application to Mars. Orig Life Evol Biosph 26:61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devall B, Sessions G (1985) Deep ecology. Gibbs Smith, Layton

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVincenzi DL (1992) Planetary protection issues and the future exploration of Mars. Adv Space Res 12(4):121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVincenzi DL, Klein HP, Race MS (1998) Planetary protection, sample return missions and Mars exploration: history, status and future needs. J Geophys Res 103:28577–28585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezell EC, Ezell LN (1984) On Mars: exploration of the Red Planet, 1958–1978. (The NASA History Series) NASA SP-4212

  • Fogg MJ (1995) Terraforming: engineering planetary environments. SAE International, Warrendale

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehman HW, Barry JL, Deal DW et al (2003) The Columbia accident investigation board report, vol 1. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilichinsky DA, Vorobyova EA, Erokhina LG et al (1992) Long-term preservation of microbial ecosystems in permafrost. Adv Space Res 12(4):255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilichinsky DA, Wilson GS, Friedmann EI et al (2007) Microbial populations in Antarctic permafrost: biodiversity, state, age, and implication for astrobiology. Astrobiology 7:275–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladman BJ, Burns JA, Duncan M et al (1996) The exchange of impact ejecta between terrestrial planets. Science 271:1387–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin R (2000) Mars: the NASA missions. Apogee Books, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay CP (1986) Exobiology and future Mars missions: the search for Mars’s earliest biosphere. Adv Space Res 6(12):269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay CP (1990) Does Mars have rights? An approach to the environmental ethics of planetary engineering. In: MacNiven D (ed) Moral expertise. Routledge, New York, pp 184–197

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay CP (1997) The search for life on Mars. Orig Life Evol Biosph 27:263–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay CP (2001a) The search for a second genesis of life in our Solar System. In: Chela-Flores J (ed) First steps in the origin of life in the universe. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 269–277

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKay CP (2001b, July/August) Let’s put Martian life first. The Planetary report, vol 21, pp 4–5

  • McKay CP (2007) Hard life for microbes and humans on the Red Planet. As Astra 19(3):30–31

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay CP (2009a) Planetary ecosynthesis on Mars: restoration ecology and environmental ethics. In: Bertka CM (ed) Exploring the origin, extent, and future of life: philosophical, ethical, and theological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 245–260

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKay CP (2009b) Biologically reversible exploration. Science 323:718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay CP (2013) Astrobiology and society: the long view. In: Impey C, Spitz A, Stoeger W (eds) Encountering life in the universe: ethical foundations and social implications of astrobiology. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 158–166

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay CP, Davis WL (1989) Planetary protection issues in advance of human exploration of Mars. Adv Space Res 9(6):197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay CP, Toon OB, Kasting JF (1991) Making Mars habitable. Nature 352:489–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay CP, Friedmann EI, Wharton RA, Davis WL (1992) History of water on Mars: a biological perspective. Adv Space Res 12(4):231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McSween HY (1994) What have we learned about Mars from SNC meteorites. Meteoritics 29:757–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mileikowsky C, Cucinotta FA, Wilson JW et al (2000) Natural transfer of viable microbes in space. 1. From Mars to Earth and Earth to Mars. Icarus 145:391–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naess A (1984) The shallow and the deep long-range ecology movement: a summary. Inquiry 16:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Science Space Studies Board (1992) Biological contamination of Mars: issues and recommendations. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Race MS (1995) Societal issues as Mars mission impediments: planetary protection and contamination concerns. Adv Space Res 15(3):285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph RO, McKay CP (2014) Protecting and expanding the richness and diversity of life, an ethic for astrobiology research and space exploration. Int J Astrobiol 13:28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummel JD (2001) Planetary protection in the time of astrobiology: protecting against biological contamination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2128–2131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummel JD, Beaty DW, Jones MA et al (2014) A new analysis of Mars “special regions”: findings of the second MEPAG Special Regions Science Analysis Group (SR-SAG2). Astrobiology 14:887–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuerger AC, Mancinelli RL, Kern RG et al (2003) Survival of endospores of Bacillus subtilis on spacecraft surfaces under simulated Martian environments: implications for the forward contamination of Mars. Icarus 165:253–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HD, McKay CP (2005) Drilling in ancient permafrost on Mars for evidence of a second genesis of life. Planet Space Sci 53:1302–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterns PM, Tennen LI (1995) Legal aspects of planetary protection for Mars missions. Adv Space Res 15(3):281–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden DE, Marchant DR, Potter N et al (1995) Preservation of Miocene glacier ice in East Antarctica. Nature 376:412–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss BP, Kirschvink JL, Baudenbacher FJ et al (2000) A low temperature transfer of ALH84001 from Mars to Earth. Science 290:791–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Space Science Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA

    Christopher P. McKay

Authors
  1. Christopher P. McKay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher P. McKay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McKay, C.P. The Search on Mars for a Second Genesis of Life in the Solar System and the Need for Biologically Reversible Exploration. Biol Theory 13, 103–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0284-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0284-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation