Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of Chaetosiphon fragaefolii (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Different Strawberry Cultivars

  • Pest Management
  • Published:
Neotropical Entomology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The green aphid Chaetosiphon fragaefolii (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) is one of the most important pests of strawberry production systems worldwide. One of the fundamental points for developing management strategies for this aphid is the understanding of its population growth since this allows predictions about future population peaks and which are the most appropriate hosts for its survival and reproduction. Thus, the goal of this study was to evaluate the biological and population growth parameters of C. fragaefolii in four strawberry cultivars (Albion, Aromas, Camarosa, and San Andreas). The highest survival of the nymph stage was observed in ‘San Andreas’ (87%) and the lowest in ‘Camarosa’ (43%). ‘Albion’ had the highest net reproductive rate (R0 = 6.39) and the mean time for the population to double in number (TD = 5.61), thus presenting the best reproductive parameters for C. fragaefolii. ‘Camarosa’ and ‘Aromas’ had the lowest R0 values (2.65 and 2.70, respectively) and the highest TD values (10.89 and 10.34, respectively). We conclude that antibiosis mechanisms are involved in the resistance process of ‘Camarosa’ to C. fragaefolii. The characterization and the use of resistant cultivars can be an essential strategy to assist aphid management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antunes LEC, Reisser JRC, Schwengber JE (eds) (2016) Morangueiro. Embrapa, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bathia V, Uniyal PL, Bhattacharya R (2011) Aphid resistance in Brassica crops: challenges, biotechnological progress and emerging possibilities. Biotechnol Adv 29:879–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellows Junior TS, Van Driesche RG, Elkinton JS (1992) Life-table construction and analysis in the evaluation of natural enemies. Annu Rev Entomol 37:587–614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.003103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benatto A, Mógor AF, Penteado SRC, Pereira LS, Salas FJS, Zawadneak MAC (2018) Influence of trichomes in strawberry cultivars on the feeding behavior of Chaetosiphon fragaefolii (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Neotrop Entomol 47(5):569–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-018-0596-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi D, Garcia MS, Botton M, Nava DE (2012) Biology and fecundity life table of the green aphid Chaetosiphon fragaefolli on strawberry cultivars. J Insect Sci 12:28–28. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.012.2801

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi D, Araujo ES, Zawadneak MAC, Botton M, Mogor AF, Garcia MS (2013) Aphid species and population dynamics associated with strawberry. Neotrop Entomol 42:628–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-013-0153-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi D, Botton M, Nava DE, Zawadneak MAC (2015) Guia para a identificação e monitoramento de pragas e seus inimigos naturais em morangueiro. Embrapa, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman RL, Eastop VF (1984) Aphids on the world’s crops: an identification guide. Wiley e Sons, New York, p 466

    Google Scholar 

  • Cédola C, Greco N (2010) Presence of the aphid, Chaetosiphon fragaefolii, on strawberry in Argentina. J Insect Sci 9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.010.0901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cisneros JJ, Godfrey LD (2001) Midseason pest status of the cotton aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) in California cotton: is nitrogen a key factor? Environ Entomol 30:501–510. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-30.3.501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daubeny H (1994) Strawberry. In: J.N. Cummins (ed.). Register of new fruit and nut varieties - list 36. HortScience 29:960–964

  • de Souza MT, Zawadneak MAC (2018) Monitorando e identificando as pragas e inimigos naturais do morangueiro. Campo & Negócios HF 5:58–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon AFG (1987) Parthenogenetic reproduction and the rate of increase in aphids. In: Minks AK, Harrewinjn P (eds) World crop pests. Aphids: their biology, natural enemies and control, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 269–287

  • Dixon AFG (1998) Aphid ecology. London, Chapman & Hall, p300

  • Dogimont C, Bendahmane A, Chovelon V, Boissot N (2010) Host plant resistance to aphids in cultivated crops: genetic and molecular bases, and interactions with aphid populations. C R Biol 333(6–7):566–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2010.04.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frazie NW, Mellor FC (1970) In: Frazier NW (ed) Virus diseases of small fruits and grapevines. Univ. of Calif. Div. of Agric. Sci, Berkeley, Calif, p 18

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier NW (1955) Strawberry vein banding virus. Phytopathology 45:307–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldemond JA, Van Den Brink WJ, Den Belder E (1998) Methods of assessing population increase in aphids and the effect of growth stage of the host plant on population growth rates. Entomol Exp Appl 86:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.1998.00277.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlec F, Duarte ADF, Oliveira ACBD, Cunha USD (2017) Development of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in different strawberry cultivars. Rev Bras Frutic 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452017171

  • Karley AJ, Douglas AE, Parker WE (2002) Amino acid composition and nutritional quality of potato leaf phloem sap for aphids. J Exp Biol 205:3009–3018

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kloth KJ, Busscher-Lange J, Wiegers GL, Kruijer W, Buijs G, Meyer RC, Albrectsen BR, Bouwmeester HJ, Dicke M, Jongsma MA (2017) Sieve element-lining chaperone1 restricts aphid feeding on Arabidopsis during heat stress. Plant Cell 29:2450–2464. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kocourek F, Havelka J, Beránková J, Jarosik V (1994) Effect of temperature on development rate and intrinsic rate of increase of Aphis gossypii reared on greenhouse cucumbers. Entomol exp appl 71:59–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1994.tb01769.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavandero B, Rojas P, Ramirez CC, Salazar M, Caligari PD (2012) Genetic structure of the aphid, Chaetosiphon fragaefolii, and its role as a vector of the Strawberry yellow edge virus to a native strawberry, Fragaria chiloensis in Chile. J Insect Sci 12:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.012.11001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor FC, Forbes AR (1960) Transmission of strawberry viruses by aphids. Can J Bot 38(3):343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milenković S, Pešaković M, Marčić D, Milošević D (2014) Strawberry resistance to the aphid Chaetosiphon fragaefolii Cockerell Homoptera: Aphididae. Pestic Fitomed 29:267–273. https://doi.org/10.2298/PIF1404267M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minks AK, Harrewijn P (Eds) (1987) Aphids, their biology, natural enemies and control. World Crop Pests 2A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp312

  • Moran N (1981) Intraspecific variability in herbivore performance and host quality: a field study of Uroleucon caligatum (Homoptera: Aphididae) and its Solidago hosts (Asteraceae). Ecol Entomol 6:301–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1981.tb00617.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mottaghinia L, Razmjou J, Nouri-Ganbalani G, Rafiee-Dastjerdi H (2011) Antibiosis and antixenosis of six commonly produced potato cultivars to the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae Sulzer (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Neotrop entomol 40:380–386. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2011000300012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nardelli A, Peona V, Toschi A, Mandrioli M, Manicardi GC (2017) Afit: a bioinformatic tool for measuring aphid fitness and invasiveness. Bull Entomol Res 107(4):458–465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485316001061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Painter RH (1951) Insect resistance in crop plants. Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peixoto Neto PAS, Azevedo JL, Araújo WL (2002) Microrganismos endofíticos. Biotecnolog. Cienc. Desenvolv 29:62–77

  • Penteado SRC, Oliveira EB, Lazzari SMN (2010) TabVida – Sistema computacional para cálculo de parâmetros biológicos e de crescimento populacional de afídeos. Embrapa Florestas, 1 CD-ROM (Embrapa Florestas, Documentos, 203), Colombo

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell RB, Stern MJ, Ardoin N (2006) A sustainable evaluation framework and its application. Appl Environ Educ Commun 5:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/15330150601059290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051–07-0. Available in: <http://www.R-project.org/.>

  • Rabinovich JE (1978) Ecologia de Poblaciones Animales. Secretaria General de La Organización de los Estados Americanos. Consejo Nacional para la Enseñanza de la Biología, Editorial Continental. México, pp 313

  • Rondon SI, Cantliffe DJ (2004) Chaetosiphon fragaefolii (Homptera: Aphididae): a potencial new pest in Florida? Fla Entomol 87(4):612–616. https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2004)087[0612:CFHAAP]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu HK (2016) Cultivares de morangueiro. In: Rampazzo EF, Shimizu HK, Marques GN, RMN P, Fermino MH, Furlani PR, Vidal HR, Zawadneak MAC (eds) Dolci In: Cultivo de morangueiro em substrato, SENAR PR, Curitiba, pp 17–34

  • Smith CM (1989) Plant resistance to insects: a fundamental approach. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p 286

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson LJ, Macfadyen S, Hoffmann AA (2010) Predicting the effects of climate change on natural enemies of agricultural pests. Biol Control 52:296–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.01.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood N, Halpern S, Klein C (2011) Effect of host-plant genotype and neighboring plants on strawberry aphid movement in the greenhouse and field. Am Midl Nat 165:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-165.1.38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valério E, Cecílio A (2005) Afídeos. In: Palha MG (c) (ed) Manual do morangueiro. Belgráfica, Lisboa, Alhos Vedros, pp 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lenteren JC, Woets J (1988) Biological and integrated pest control in greenhouses. Annu Rev Entomol 33:239–269. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.33.010188.001323

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank PROEXT MEC Sesu for the financial support, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Nível Superior (CAPES) for a grant to the first author, the Fundação Araucária de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Estado do Paraná (FA) for the productivity grants in research awarded to the last author, and Bioagro (Araucária, Paraná State, Brazil) for providing seedlings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AB, SCP, and MACZ planned and designed the study, AB executed experimental work and conducted the data analyses, and AB, SCP, and MACZ wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M A C Zawadneak.

Additional information

Edited by Leandro P Ribeiro – EPAGRI

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benatto, A., Penteado, S.C. & Zawadneak, M.A.C. Performance of Chaetosiphon fragaefolii (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Different Strawberry Cultivars. Neotrop Entomol 48, 692–698 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-019-00683-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-019-00683-8

Keywords

Navigation