Determination of the Genetic and Synergistic Suppression of a Methoxyfenozide-Resistant Strain of the House Fly Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)
- 90 Downloads
Musca domestica Linnaeus (house fly, Diptera: Muscidae) is a major veterinary and medical important pest all over the world. These flies have ability to develop resistance to insecticides. The present trial was performed to discover the inheritance mode (autosomal, dominance, number of genes involved) and preliminary mechanism of methoxyfenozide resistance in order to provide basic information necessary to develop resistance management strategy for this pest. A strain of M. domestica (MXY-SEL) was exposed to methoxyfenozide for 44 generations which developed a 5253.90-fold level of resistance to methoxyfenozide. The overlapping fiducial limits of LC50 values of the reciprocal crosses, F1 (MXY-SEL ♂ × Susceptible ♀) and F1† (MXY-SEL ♀ × Susceptible ♂), suggest that inheritance of methoxyfenozide resistance was an autosomal and likely completely dominant trait (DLC = 0.93 and 0.94 for F1 and F1†, respectively). Backcrosses of the F1 with the parental MXY-SEL or Susceptible population predict a polygenic mode of inheritance. Piperonyl butoxide significantly altered the LC50 values, suggesting enhanced detoxification by cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenases is a major mechanism of resistance to methoxyfenozide in the MXY-SEL strain. The estimated realized heritability was 0.07 for methoxyfenozide. These results would be helpful for the better management of M. domestica.
KeywordsInheritance pattern, autosomal, realized heritability
The authors are highly grateful to Prof. (Rtd.) Dr. Gerald Wilde and Prof. Dr. R. Jeff Whitworth, Kansas State University, USA, for the critical review of the manuscript to improve English language.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Abbas N, Shad SA, Shah RM (2015c) Resistance status of Musca domestica L. populations to neonicotinoids and insect growth regulators in Pakistan poultry facilities. Pak J Zool 47:1663–1671Google Scholar
- Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Finney D (1971) A statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve. Probit analysis, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, London, p 333Google Scholar
- IRAC (2016) IRAC mode of action classification (version 8.1).pp, 1-26.Google Scholar
- LeOra S (2003) Polo plus, a user’s guide to Probit or logic analysis. LeOra Software, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
- Mota-Sanchez D, Wise JC, Poppen RV, Gut LJ, Hollingworth RM (2008) Resistance of codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.)(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), larvae in Michigan to insecticides with different modes of action and the impact on field residual activity. Pest Manag Sci 64:881–890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Otte J, Pfeiffer D, Tiensin T, Price L, Silbergeld E (2007) Highly pathogenic avian influenza risk, biosecurity and smallholder adversity. Livest Res Rural Dev 19:102Google Scholar
- Robertson JL, Savin N, Preisler HK, Russell RM (2007) Bioassays with arthropods. CRC press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
- Scott JG (1990) Investigating mechanisms of insecticide resistance: methods, strategies, and pitfalls pesticide resistance in arthropods. Springer, p 39–57Google Scholar
- Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 3rd edn. WH Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Tabashnik BE (1992) Resistance risk assessment: Realized heritability of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Econ Entomol 85:1551–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar