Current Obesity Reports

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 97–104 | Cite as

Obesity Prevention: Strategies and Challenges in Latin America

  • Louise Cominato
  • Georgia Finardi Di Biagio
  • Denise Lellis
  • Ruth Rocha Franco
  • Marcio Correa Mancini
  • Maria Edna de Melo
Obesity Prevention (A Must, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Obesity Prevention

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this study is to present changes of policies and norms aimed to reduce obesity levels that have been adopted in some Latin American countries.

Recent Findings

The global increase of the excess weight within the population has been demanding governmental actions aimed at preventing health impacts generated by obesity. Over recent years, many Latin American countries have established a number of regulations aimed at reducing weight in the population using interventions that could effectively prevent childhood obesity, including the taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), increasing physical activity in open spaces, and, especially, front-of-package labeling.

Summary

Some strategies are part of the Action Plan for Prevention of Child and Adolescence Obesity signed by all countries in Latin America, which currently have among the highest prevalence of childhood obesity in the world. Among them are the implementation of fiscal policies on energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods and taxes on SSBs; improvements in nutrition labeling, highlighting the front-of-package (FOP) labeling to promote the choice of healthier products at the time of purchase; and promotion of an active lifestyle, such as encouraging the use of bicycle paths or physical activity programs at school. The real impact of these prevention strategies implemented in Latin America on the prevalence of obesity is still unknown.

Keywords

Obesity, prevention Chronic disease, non-communicable Meals Fast food Physical activity School health services Schools, public health Food labeling 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Louise Cominato, Georgia Finardi Di Biagio, Denise Lellis, Ruth Rocha Franco, Marcio Correa Mancini, and Maria Edna de Melo declare they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pont SJ, Puhl R, Cook SR, Slusser W, Section on obesity and The Obesity Society. Stigma experienced by children and adolescents with obesity. Pediatrics. 2017;140:e20173034.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nishida C, Uauy R, Kumanyika S, Shetty P. The joint WHO/FAO expert consultation on diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: process, product and policy implications. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7(1A):245–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sawaya AL, Roberts S. Stunting and future risk of obesity: principal physiological mechanisms. Cad Saude Publica. 2003;19(1):21–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Plan of action for the prevention of obesity in children and adolescents. Resolution CE154.R2. In: 154th Session of the Pan American Health Organization Executive Committee. Washington, D.C., USA, 16-20 2015.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pérez-Escamilla R, Kac G. Childhood obesity prevention: a life-course framework. Int J Obes Suppl. 2013;3(1):3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tirado MC, Galicia L, Husby HM, López J, Olamendi S, Chaparro MP, et al. Mapping of nutrition and sectoral policies addressing malnutrition in Latin America. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016;40(2):114–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caballero B, Vorkoper S, Anand S, Rivera JA. Preventing childhood obesity in Latin America: an agenda for regional research and strategic partnerships. Obes Rev. 2017;18(2):3–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Colchero MA, Salgado JC, Unar Munguia M, Hernandez Avila M, Rivera Dommarco JA. Price elasticity of the demand for sugar sweetened beverages and soft drinks in Mexico. Econ Hum Biol. 2015;19:129–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Colchero MA, Popkin BM, Rivera JA, Ng SW. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ. 2016;352:h6704.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Colchero MA, Guerrero-Lopez CM, Molina M, Rivera JA. Beverages sales in Mexico before and after implementation of a sugar sweetened beverage tax. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163463.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163463.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    • Colchero MA, Rivera Dommarco J, Popkin BM, Ng SW. In Mexico, evidence of sustained consumer response two years after implementing a sugar sweetened beverage tax. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(3):564–71. After Mexico implemented a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (January 1, 2014), purchases of taxed beverages decreased 5.5 percent in 2014 and 9.7 percent in 2015, yielding an average reduction of 7.6 percent over the study period. Households at the lowest socioeconomic level had the largest decreases in purchases of taxed beverages in both years. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Batis C, Rivera JA, Popkin BM, Taillie LS. First year evaluation of Mexico’s tax on nonessential energy dense foods: an observational study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(7):e1002057.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alvarado M, Kostova D, Suhrcke M, Hambleton I, Hassell T, Samuels TA, et al. Trends in beverage prices following the introduction of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Barbados. Prev Med. 2017;105:23–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    WCRF/AICR. Policy and action for cancer prevention—food, nutrition and physical activity: a global perspective. Washington DC: WCRF/AICR; 2009. http://www.dietandcancerreport.org/cancer_resource_center/policy_report.php. Accessed on 20 Jan 2018Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Galicia L, López de Romaña D, Harding KB, De-Regil LM, Grajeda R. Tackling malnutrition in Latin America and the Caribbean: challenges and opportunities. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016;40(2):138–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    FAO/PAHO. Panorama of food and nutrition security in Latin America and the Caribbean: healthy food systems to end hunger and malnutrition. Santiago, 2016. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6977e.pdf. Accessed on 20 Jan 2018.
  18. 18.
    World Health Organization. Global Nutrition Targets 2025: Childhood overweight policy brief. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/149021/2/WHO_NMH_NHD_14.6_eng.pdf. Accessed on 20 Jan 2018.
  19. 19.
    Rincón-Gallardo PS, Carriedo A, Tolentino-Mayo L, Allemandi L, Tiscornia V, Araneda J, et al. Review of current labelling regulations and practices for food and beverage targeting children and adolescents in Latin America countries (Mexico, Chile, Costa Rica and Argentina) and recommendations for facilitating consumer. Hong Kong: United Nations Children’s fund (UNICEF); 2016.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    •• Arrúa A, et al. Warnings as a directive front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme: comparison with the guideline daily amount and traffic-light systems. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(13):2308–17. In the present work, WOBS was compared with two of the most widely studied FOP labels, GDA and traffic-light systems. WOBS seemed to be more effective in helping consumers identify unhealthful products than more detailed semi-directive FOP labels, such as the traffic-light system, and discouraging consumers from buying unhealthful products which have been linked with obesity and several non-communicable diseases. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    • Arrúa A, Curutchet MR, Rey N, Barreto P, Golovchenko N, Sellanes A, et al. Impact of front-of-pack nutrition information and label design on children's choice of two snack foods: comparison of warnings and the traffic-light system. Appetite. 2017;116:139–46. It was clearly about the influence of the marketing strategies used by the food industry on children’s choices through the presence of cartoon characters, fruit drawings, or nutrient claims. It significantly influenced the preference of products with unfavorable nutrient profile and could also affect their healthfulness perception. FOP labels could improve children’s awareness of the nutrition profile of products and discourage consumption of unhealthful products. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mandle J, Tugendhaft A, Michalow J, Hofman K. Nutrition labelling: a review of research on consumer and industry response in the global South. Glob Health Action. 2015;22(8):25912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    World Health Organization JC, FAO Expert. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases; 2003. p. 916.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ministerio de Salud. Gobierno de Chile. Informe de evaluación de la implementación de la ley sobre composición nutricional de los alimentos y su publicidad. Santiago; 2017.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nieto C, Rincon-Gallardo Patiño S, Tolentino-Mayo L, Carriedo A, Barquera S. Characterization of breakfast cereals available in the Mexican market: sodium and sugar content. Nutrients. 2017;9(8):884.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Governo do Brasil. Relatório do Grupo de Trabalho Sobre Rotulagem Nutricional. Brasil, 2017. http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/219201/2782895/Documento+3+-Relat%C3%B3rio+do+Grupo+de+Trabalho+sobre+Rotulagem+Nutricional.pdf/eed8cd1b-33c1-42c6-b847-12255e3d2264. Accessed on 20 Jan 2018.
  27. 27.
    Ng SW, Popkin BM. Time use and physical activity: a shift away from movement across the globe. Obes Rev. 2012;13(8):659–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):247–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Müller AM, Alley S, Schoeppe S, Vandelanotte C. The effectiveness health interventions to promote physical activity and healthy diets in developing countries: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13(1):109.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rubinstein A, Miranda JJ, Beratarrechea A, et al. Effectiveness of a health intervention to improve the cardiometabolic profile of people with prehypertension in low-resource urban settings in Latin America: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(1):52–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Florindo AA, Barrozo LV, Cabral-Miranda W, Rodrigues EQ, Turrell G, Goldbaum M, et al. Public open spaces and leisure-time walking in Brazilian adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(6):553.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Montes F, Sarmiento OL, Zarama R, Pratt M, Wang G, Jacoby E, et al. Do health benefits outweigh the costs of mass recreational programs? An economic analysis of four Ciclovia programs. J Urban Health. 2012;89(1):153–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pratt MSD, Cavill N, Giles-Corti B, et al. An international perspective on the nexus of physical activity research and policy. Environ Behav. 2016;48(1):37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Díaz del Castillo A, Pedraza C, González S, Díaz J, Ibarra L, Fernández D, et al. Ciclovías recreativas. A healthy epidemic. Colombia: Universidad de los Andes; 2016.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    World Health Organization. 1000 cities 1000 lives: urban health matters. Geneva, Switzerland; 2010. http://www.who.int/world-health-day/2010/1000cities_1000lives_brochure_blue.pdf. Accessed on 20 Jan 2018.
  36. 36.
    Sarmiento O, Torres A, Jacoby E, Pratt M, Schmid TL, Stierling G. The Ciclovia-Recreativa: a mass-recreational program with public health potential. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7(2):163–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zieff SG, Hipp JA, Eyler AA, Kim MS. Ciclovia initiatives: engaging communities, partners, and policy makers along the route to success. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013;3(1):74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Heath GW, Parra DC, Sarmiento OL, Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group, et al. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet. 2012;380:272–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Reis RS, Hino A, da Silva FL, et al. Promoting physical activity and quality of life in Vitoria, Brazil: evaluation of the Exercise Orientation Service (EOS) Program. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11:38–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sallis JF, Bull F, Guthold R, Heath GW, Inoue S, Kelly P, et al. Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium. Lancet. 2016;388:1325–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bürgi R, Tomatis L, Murer K, de Bruin ED. Localization of physical activity in primary school children using accelerometry and global positioning system. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142223.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brooke HL, Corder K, Atkin AJ, van Sluijs EM. A systematic literature review with meta-analyses of within- and between-day differences in objectively measured physical activity in school-aged children. Sports Med. 2014;44(10):1427–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Long MW, Sobol AM, Cradock AL, Subramanian SV, Blendon RJ, Gortmaker SL. School-day and overall physical activity among youth. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(2):150–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bassett DR, Fitzhugh EC, Heath GW, Erwin PC, Frederick GM, Wolff DL, et al. Estimated energy expenditures for school-based policies and active living. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(2):108–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ribeiro IC, Parra DC, Hoehner CM, Soares J, Torres A, Pratt M, et al. School-based physical education programs: evidence-based physical activity interventions for youth in Latin America. Glob Health Promot. 2010;17(2):5–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Briefel RR, Crepinsek MK, Cabili C, Wilson A, Gleason PM. School food environments and practices affect dietary behaviors of US public school children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(2):91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fox MK, Dodd AH, Wilson A, Gleason PM. Association between school food environment and practices and body mass index of US public school children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(2):108–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    •• Corvalán C, Garmendia ML, Jones-Smith J, Lutter CK, Miranda JJ, Pedraza LS, et al. Nutrition status of children in Latin America. Obes Rev. 2017;18(2):7. This paper reviews the nutrition status, physical activity situation, and a coexistence of undernutrition/overweight in Latin America children. Social programs have played an important role in decreasing undernutrition. Diets that rely on energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods and sedentary behaviors have become the norm among children. If no action is taken, the rates of overweight and obese children will continue to rise. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bustos N, Olivares S, Leyton B, Cano M, Albala C. Impact of a school-based intervention on nutritional education and physical activity in primary public schools in Chile (KIND) programme study protocol: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ministério da Educação. Governo do Brasil. Fundo Nacional de Desenvolvimento da Educação. Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário (MDA). O encontro da agricultura familiar com a alimentação escolar: http://www.mda.gov.br/sitemda/tags/programa-nacional-de-alimenta%C3%A7%C3%A3o-escolar.
  51. 51.
    Azeredo CM, de Rezende LF, Canella DS, et al. Food environments in schools and in the immediate vicinity are associated with unhealthy food consumption among Brazilian adolescents. Prev Med. 2016;88:73–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Leite FH, Oliveira MA, Cremm EC, Abreu DS, Maron LR, Martins PA. Availability of processed foods in the perimeter of public schools in urban areas. J Pediatr. 2012;88(4):328–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    He M, Tucker P, Gilliland J, Irwin JD, Larsen K, Hess P. The influence of local food environments on adolescents; food purchasing behaviors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(4):1458–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Van Hulst A, Barnett TA, Gauvin L, et al. Associations between children diets and features of their residential and school neighborhood food environments. Can J Public Health. 2012;103(3):e48–54.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Arámbulo P, Almeida CR, Cuéllar J, Belotto AJ. Street food vending in Latin America. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1994;28(4):344–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Barrera LH, Rothenberg SJ, Barquera S, Cifuentes E. The toxic food environment around elementary schools and childhood obesity in Mexican cities. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(2):264–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lobelo F, Garcia de Quevedo I, Holub CK, Nagle BJ, Arredondo EM, Barquera S, et al. School-based programs aimed at the prevention and treatment of obesity: evidence-based interventions for youth in Latin America. J Sch Health. 2013;83(9):668–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Verstraeten R, Roberfroid D, Lachat C, Leroy JL, Holdsworth M, Maes L, et al. Effectiveness of preventive school-based obesity interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96(2):415–38.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Monteiro CA, Cannon G. The impact of transnational “Big Food” companies on the south: a view from Brazil. PLoS Med. 2012;9(7):e1001252. http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001252. Accessed February 6th, 2018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Coitinho D, Monteiro CA, Popkin BM. What Brazil is doing to promote healthy diets and active lifestyles. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5:263–7.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    BRAZIL. Law n ° 11,947, of June 16, 2009. It provides for the attendance of school feeding and the Direct Money Program in the School to students of basic education and other measures. Brasília, 2009. http://www.camara.gov.br/sileg/integras/845673.pdf. Accessed on February 18th, 2018
  62. 62.
    Joint Committee on National Health Education Standards. National Health Education Standards: achieving excellence. 2nd ed. Cited in http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/sher/standards/index.htm (2016).
  63. 63.
    IOM (Institute of Medicine). Accelerating progress in obesity prevention: solving the weight of the nation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Saúde na escola. 96 p. : il. – Série B. Textos Básicos de Saúde. Cadernos de Atenção Básica; n. 24 – Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louise Cominato
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Georgia Finardi Di Biagio
    • 3
    • 4
  • Denise Lellis
    • 3
    • 5
  • Ruth Rocha Franco
    • 1
    • 3
  • Marcio Correa Mancini
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Maria Edna de Melo
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Pediatric Endocrinology Unit of the Children’s Institute of the Medicine FacultyUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Brazilian Association for the Study of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome (ABESO)São PauloBrazil
  3. 3.São PauloBrazil
  4. 4.League of Childhood Obesity of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of MedicineUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  5. 5.Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome Group of the Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations