Skip to main content
Log in

More than Nothing: Examining the Worldview Influences of Nonreligious College Students

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Review of Religious Research

Abstract

Nonreligious individuals are often defined by their absence of a religious worldview rather than the worldview that might take its place. This study examines data from a unique survey that asked a representative sample of first-year college students to identify important influences on their worldview at the beginning and end of the year. Cross-sectional analyses show that nonreligious students are less likely than religious students to identify family background or cultural traditions as important worldview influences, but are more likely to say that sexual orientation is an important influence on their worldview. Longitudinal analyses show that individuals who were nonreligious at a previous time are less likely to identify family as an important influence at a later time regardless of whether they are still nonreligious. Individuals who become nonreligious over time shift their perceived worldview influences away from religious beliefs and cultural traditions to philosophical traditions. These findings help contribute to our understanding of the content and dynamics of secular worldviews.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In practice, worldviews are not always integrated (Wellman 2008). Since individual worldviews are influenced by the social positions and groups one is a part of (Wellman 2008; Luker 1984), the resulting worldview may not be as ordered as Berger proposed, but may be fragmented (Wellman 2008).

  2. Specifically, Stata’s complex survey commands (svy) are used to denote institutions as the primary sampling unit and to apply the weights.

  3. The analysis does not examine this last option given the lack of certainty in its meaning.

  4. Unitarian Universalism is a nontraditional religious affiliation (Steensland et al. 2000). While some individuals who identify as non-religious (e.g., atheist, agnostic, and so on), may participate in Unitarian Universalist groups (Cimino and Smith 2007; Manning 2013a), the latter is still a religious affiliation and thus, those who identify as Unitarian Universalists are coded as religious.

  5. It is worth noting that other research has grouped atheists and secular humanists as well, sometimes as falling under a larger category of “freethinkers” (e.g., Cimino and Smith 2007).

  6. Note that cases can be missing on multiple variables, so these percentages may overlap some. Note also that there is no missing data on the worldview influence measures, as the variable is coded to assess selection or non-selection. This makes it difficult to distinguish non-selection of a particular influence due to, say, refusal, from non-selection due to a student not viewing that influence as important. As noted in the text, however, the analysis does control for the total number of influences selected to help account for the impact of students who did not select the requested three influences.

References

  • Baker, Joseph O., and Buster G. Smith. 2009a. The Nones: Social Characteristics of the Religiously Unaffiliated. Social Forces 87(3): 1251–1263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Joseph O., and Buster Smith. 2009b. None Too Simple: Examining Issues of Religious Nonbelief and Nonbelonging in the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48(4): 719–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Joseph O., and Buster Smith. 2015. American Secularism: Cultural Contours of Nonreligious Belief Systems. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L. 1967. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimino, Richard, and Christopher Smith. 2007. Secular Humanism and Atheism Beyond Progressive Secularism. Sociology of Religion 68(4): 407–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman III, Thomas J., Ralph W. Hood Jr., and Heinz Streib. 2018. An Introduction to Atheism, Agnosticism, and Nonreligious Worldviews. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 10(3): 203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragun, Ryan T. 2017. The Declining Significance of Religion: Secularization in Ireland. In Values and Identities in Europe: Evidence from the European Social Survey, ed. Michael J. Breen, 17–35. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, Rebecca E., Benjamin P. Correia-Harker, Matthew J. Mayhew, and Alyssa N. Rockenbach. 2017. Leveraging Student Interfaith Cooperation Through Evidence-Based Change. New Directions for Student Services 159: 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgell, Penny. 2006. Religion and Family in a Changing Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggebeen, David, and Jeffrey Dew. 2009. The Role of Religion in Adolescence for Family Formation in Young Adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(1): 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, Michael O. 1996. Through Tinted Glasses: Religion, Worldviews, and Abortion Attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 35(1): 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, Steven E. 1995. Causal Analysis with Panel Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Robert. 2001. Spiritual, but Not Religious: Understanding Unchurched America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadaway, C.Kirk, and Wade Clark Roof. 1979. Those Who Stay Religious ‘Nones’ and Those Who Don’t: A Research Note. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 18(2): 194–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hout, Michael, and Claude S. Fischer. 2002. Why More Religious Americans Have No Religious Preference: Politics and Generations. American Sociological Review 67(2): 165–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hout, Michael, and Claude S. Fischer. 2014. Explaining Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference: Political Backlash and Generational Succession, 1987-2012. Sociological Science 1(1): 423–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunsberger, Bruce, and Bob Altemeyer. 2006. Atheists: A Groundbreaking Study of America’s Nonbelievers. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, James. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Karen, Joseph H. Hammer, and Ryan T. Cragun. 2011. Extending Religion-Health Research to Secular Minorities: Issues and Concerns. Journal of Religion and Health 50(3): 608–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeung, Russell, Brett Esaki, and Alice Liu. 2015. Redefining Religious Nones: Lessons from Chinese and Japanese American Young Adults. Religions 6(3): 891–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori, Yasuko, Teresa K. Pegors, Joseph F. Hulgus, and Jeffrey H.D. Cornelius-White. 2017. A Comparison between Self-Identified Evangelical Christians’ and Nonreligious Persons’ Attitudes Toward Transgender Persons. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity 4(1): 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosmin, Barry A., Ariela Keysar, Ryan Cragun, and Juhem Navarro-Rivera. 2009. American Nones: The Profile of the No Religion Population, A Report Based on the American Religious Identification Survey 2008. http://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/facpub. Accessed 6 June 2017.

  • Krok, Dariusz. 2016. Examining the Role of Religion in a Family Setting: Religious Attitudes and Quality of Life Among Parents and Their Adolescent Children. Journal of Family Studies Advanced Online Publication accessed at. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2016.1176589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDrew, Stephen. 2013. Reply: Toward a Critical Sociology of Atheism: Identity, Politics, Ideology. Sociology of Religion 74(4): 464–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipka, Michael. 2015 (May 13th). A Closer Look at America’s Rapidly Growing Religious ‘Nones’. Pew Research Center. www.pewresearch.org. Accessed 6 June 2017.

  • Lim, Chaeyoon, Carol Ann MacGregor, and Robert D. Putnam. 2010. Secular and Liminal: Discovering Heterogeneity among Religious Nones. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 49(4): 596–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Christel J. 2013a. Unaffiliated Parents and the Religious Training of Their Children. Sociology of Religion 74(2): 149–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Christel J. 2013b. Atheism, Secularity, the Family, and Children. In Atheism and Secularity, ed. Phil Zuckerman, 19–41. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Christel J. 2015. Losing Our Religion: How Unaffiliated Parents are Raising Their Children. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, Scott. 2010. Logistic Regression: From Introductory to Advanced Concepts and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1948. The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. The Antioch Review 8(2): 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Scott M. 1996. An Interactive Model of Religiosity Inheritance: The Importance of Family Context. American Sociological Review 61(5): 858–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Laura R., Wendy Cadge, and James T. Harrison. 2006. Religion and Public Opinion about Same-Sex Marriage. Social Science Quarterly 87(2): 340–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockenbach, Alyssa N. 2017. Building Inclusive Community by Bridging Worldview Differences: A Call to Action from the Interfaith Diversity Experiences and Attitudes Longitudinal Survey (IDEALS). Journal of College and Character 18(3): 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockenbach, Alyssa N., Matthew J. Mayhew, Benjamin P. Correia-Harker, Laura Dahl, and Shauna Morin. 2017. Navigating Pluralism: How Students Approach Religious Difference and Interfaith Engagement in Their First Year of College. Chicago, IL: Interfaith Youth Core.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel, Landon. 2016. Gender and Homosexuality Attitudes Across Religious Groups from the 1970s to 2014: Similarity, Distinction, and Adaptation. Social Science Research 55(1): 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepulvado, Brandon, David Hachen, Michael Penta, and Omar Lizardo. 2015. Social Affiliation from Religious Disaffiliation: Evidence of Selective Mixing Among Youth with No Religious Preference During the Transition to College. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 54(4): 833–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Christian, Michael Emerson, Sally Gallagher, Paul Kennedy, and David Sikkink. 1998. American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thriving. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Jesse M. 2011. Becoming an Atheist in America: Constructing Identity and Meaning from the Rejection of Theism. Sociology of Religion 72(2): 215–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Jesse M. 2013. Creating a Godless Community: The Collective Identity Work of Contemporary American Atheists. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52(1): 80–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Jesse M., and Ryan T. Cragun. 2019. Mapping Religion’s Other: A Review of the Study of Nonreligion and Secularity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 58: 319–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Tom W., Davern, Michael, Freese, Jeremy, and Hout, Michael. General Social Surveys, 1972–2016. [machine-readable data file]. Principal Investigator, Tom W. Smith; Co-Principal Investigators, Peter V. Marsden and Michael Hout, NORC ed. Chicago: NORC, 2017. 1 data file (62,466 logical records) and 1 codebook (3689 pp).

  • Speed, David, Thomas J. Coleman III, and Joseph Langston. 2018. What Do You Mean, ‘What Does It All Mean?’ Atheism, Nonreligion, and Life Meaning. SAGE Open 8(1): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steensland, Brian, Jerry Z. Park, Mark D. Regnerus, Lynn D. Robinson, W. Bradford Wilcox, and Robert D. Woodberry. 2000. The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art. Social Forces 79(1): 291–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumerau, J.E., and Ryan Cragun. 2016. ‘I Think Some People Need Religion’: The Social Construction of Nonreligious Moral Identities. Sociology of Religion 77(4): 386–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, Joel. 2016. You Make the Choice: Religious and Secular Socialization among Marginal Affiliated and Nonreligious Individuals. Secularism and Nonreligion 5(6): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, Joel, and Sarah Wilkins-Laflamme. 2017. Becoming a Religious None: Irreligious Socialization and Disaffiliation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 56(1): 64–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Darwin L. 1988. The Religion-Family Connection: Social Science Perspectives. Provo, UT: Religious Studies Center at Brigham Young University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uecker, Jeremy E., Damon Mayrl, and Samuel Stroope. 2016. Family Formation and Returning to Institutional Religion in Young Adulthood. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 55(2): 384–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, Glenn M. 1969. The Religious ‘Nones’. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 7(2): 219–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman Jr., James K. 2008. Evangelical vs. Liberal: The Clash of Christian Cultures in the Pacific Northwest. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Ian R., Patrick Royston, and Angela M. Wood. 2011. Multiple Imputation Using Chained Equations: Issues and Guidance for Practice. Statistics in Medicine 30(4): 377–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, Phil. 2012. Faith No More: Why People Reject Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible through the generous support of The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, Interfaith Youth Core, Dr. Matthew Mayhew, and Dr. Alyssa Rockenbach. The author also thanks Buster Smith for his feedback on earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher P. Scheitle.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scheitle, C.P., Corcoran, K.E. More than Nothing: Examining the Worldview Influences of Nonreligious College Students. Rev Relig Res 62, 249–271 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-019-00391-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-019-00391-0

Navigation