Advertisement

Rejecting Darwinian Evolution: The Effects of Education, Church Tradition, and Individual Theological Stance Among UK Churchgoers

  • Andrew Village
  • Sylvia Baker
Original Paper

Abstract

A sample of 2232 committed churchgoers from a range of churches in the UK completed a questionnaire that included a measure of rejection of Darwinian evolution. Respondents with undergraduate or postgraduate qualifications had slightly lower odds of rejecting evolution than those without degrees, but whether qualifications were in non-biological science, biology or theology made little difference to the likelihood of rejection. Those who attended Anglican or Methodist (AM) churches were much less likely to reject evolution than those who attended Evangelical or Pentecostal (EP) churches, but the effect of education on reducing rejection was similar in both groups. Individual theological conservatism was strongly associated with rejection, but whereas liberals showed declining rejection with increased education, there was no such effect for conservatives. Frequent church attendance and Bible reading both predicted rejection, and the effect of Bible reading was most pronounced among AM churchgoers. Higher education of any kind may reduce the likelihood of rejection of evolution among many UK churchgoers, but theological conservatives from any tradition will tend to maintain their belief that Darwinian evolution does not explain the origin of species whatever their educational experience.

Keywords

Churchgoers Conservatism Cultural cognition Education Evolution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank those who took part in this study, and the Biblical Creation Trust for supporting some of the costs of this project.

References

  1. Antolin, M.F., and J.M. Herbers. 2001. Perspective: Evolution’s struggle for existence in America’s public schools. Evolution 55 (12): 2379–2388.  https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[2379:pessfe]2.0.co;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, Joseph O. 2013. Acceptance of evolution and support for teaching creationism in public schools: The conditional impact of educational attainment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52 (1): 216–228.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, Sylvia. 2010. Creationism in the classroom: A controversy with serious consequences. Research in Education 83 (1): 78–88.  https://doi.org/10.7227/rie.83.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkman, Michael B., and Eric Plutzer. 2010. Evolution, creationism, and the battle to control America’s classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bielo, James S. 2009. Words upon the word: An ethnography of evangelical group Bible study. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blackwell, W.H., M.J. Powell, and G.H. Dukes. 2003. The problem of student acceptance of evolution. Journal of Biological Education 37 (2): 58–67.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blancke, Stefaan, Maarten Boudry, Johan Braeckman, Johan De Smedt, and Helen De Cruz. 2011. Dealing with creationist challenges. What European biology teachers might expect in the classroom. Journal of Biological Education 45 (4): 176–182.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.546677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burdette, Amy M., Christopher G. Ellison, and Terrence D. Hill. 2005. Conservative Protestantism and tolerance toward homosexuals: An examination of potential mechanisms. Sociological Inquiry 75 (2): 177–196.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.2005.00118.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornish-Bowden, Athel, and Maria Luz Cárdenas. 2007. The threat from creationism to the rational teaching of biology. Biological Research 40 (2): 113–122.  https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-97602007000200002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darwin, Charles. 1859. The origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ecklund, Elaine Howard, and Jerry Z. Park. 2009. Conflict between religion and science among academic scientists? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48 (2): 276–292.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01447.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans, E.M. 2001. Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology 42 (3): 217–266.  https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eve, Raymond A., and Francis B. Harrold. 1990. The creationist movement in modern America. Boston, MA: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Finlay, Barbara, and Carol S. Walther. 2003. The relation of religious affiliation, service attendance, and other factors to homophobic attitudes among university students. Review of Religious Research 44 (4): 370–393.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3512216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, Patricia K., and David J. Houston. 2011. Rejecting Darwin and support for science funding. Social Science Quarterly 92 (5): 1151–1168.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00812.x.Google Scholar
  16. Gayon, Jean. 1998. Darwinism’s struggle for survival: Heredity and the hypothesis of natural selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hand, Carl M., and Kent D. Van Liere. 1984. Religion, mastery-over-nature, and environmental concern. Social Forces 63 (2): 555–570.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2579062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henry, Carl. 1979. God, revelation and authority. Hermeneutics, authority, and canon. Waco, TX: Word Books.Google Scholar
  19. Hill, Jonathan P. 2014. Rejecting evolution: The role of religion, education, and social networks. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 53 (3): 575–594.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ICBI. 1978. Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy. http://www.bible-researcher.com/chicago1.html. Accessed 6 Dec 2017.
  21. Kahan, Dan M, and Keith E Stanovich. 2016. Rationality and belief in human evolution. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2838668. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  22. Kahan, Dan M. 2015. What is the ‘science of science communication’? JCOM: Journal of Science Communication 14 (3): 1–12.Google Scholar
  23. Kahan, Dan M., Hank Jenkins-Smith, and Donald Braman. 2011. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research 14 (2): 147–174.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lac, Andrew, Vanessa Hemovich, and Igor Himelfarb. 2010. Predicting position on teaching creationism (instead of evolution) in public schools. Journal of Educational Research 103 (4): 253–261.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laland, Kevin N., Tobias Uller, Marcus W. Feldman, Kim Sterelny, Gerd B. Müller, Armin Moczek, Eva Jablonka, and John Odling-Smee. 2015. The extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282 (1813): 20151019.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Larson, Edward John. [1997] 2006. Summer for the gods: The Scopes trial and America’s continuing debate over scjence and religion. New York: BasicBooks.Google Scholar
  27. Mackenzie, Jim. 2010. How biology teachers can respond to intelligent design. Cambridge journal of education 40 (1): 53–67.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640903567039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malley, Brian. 2004. How the Bible works: An anthropological study of evangelical biblicism. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  29. McCain, Kevin, and Kostas Kampourakis. 2016. Which question do polls about evolution and belief really ask, and why does it matter? Public Understanding of Science 27 (1): 2–10.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516642726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, Jon D., Eugenie C. Scott, and Shinji Okamoto. 2006. Public acceptance of evolution. Science 313 (5788): 765–766.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1126746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moore, Randy. 2000. The revival of creationism in the United States. Journal of Biological Education 35 (1): 17–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morris, Henry M., and Gary Parker. 1982. What is creation science?. El Cajon, CA: Master Books.Google Scholar
  33. Müller, Tim S., Nan Dirk De Graaf, and Peter Schmidt. 2014. Which societies provide a strong religious socialization context? Explanations beyond the effects of national religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 53 (4): 739–760.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newport, Frank. 2012. In US, 46% hold creationist view of human origins. http://www.gallup.com/poll/155003/Hold-Creationist-View-Human-Origins.aspx. Accessed 15 June 2012.
  35. Persson, Johannes, Nils-Eric Sahlin, and Annika Wallin. 2015. Climate change, values, and the cultural cognition thesis. Environmental Science and Policy 52: 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. PEW_Research_Centre. 2017. Religious landscape study. http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/. Accessed 19 Apr 2017.
  37. Poling, Devereaux A., and E.Margaret Evans. 2004. Religious belief, scientific expertise, and folk ecology. Journal of Cognition and Culture 4 (3): 485–524.  https://doi.org/10.1163/1568537042484931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Randall, Kelvin. 2005. Evangelicals etcetera: Conflict and conviction in the Church of England’s parties. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  39. Rodman, Rosamund C. 2009. “We are Anglicans, They are the Church of England”: Uses of Scripture in the Anglican crisis. In The social life of scriptures: Cross-cultural perspectives on biblicism, ed. James S. Bielo, 100–113. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Ronald, Emily K. 2012. More than “alone with the Bible”: Reconceptualizing religious reading. Sociology of Religion 73 (3): 323–344.  https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srs001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schilders, Mariska, Peter Sloep, Einat Peled, and Kerst Boersma. 2009. Worldviews and evolution in the biology classroom. Journal of Biological Education 43 (3): 115–120.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2009.9656165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shtulman, Andrew, and Prassede Calabi. 2012. Cognitive constraints on the understanding and acceptance of evolution. In Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution, ed. Karl Sven Rosengren. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. van der Linden, Sander. 2016. A conceptual critique of the cultural cognition thesis. Science Communication 38 (1): 128–139.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015614970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Village, Andrew. 2005a. Christian belief about the Bible and the Holy Spirit in relation to psychological type. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion 16: 1–16.Google Scholar
  45. Village, Andrew. 2005b. Factors shaping biblical literalism: A study among Anglican laity. Journal of Beliefs and Values 26 (1): 29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13617670500047566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Village, Andrew. 2007. The Bible and lay people: An empirical approach to ordinary hermeneutics. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  47. Village, Andrew. 2014. The relationship of psychological type to interpretations of Genesis among churchgoers in England. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 6 (1): 72–82.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Village, Andrew. 2015. Was White right? Biblical interpretation, theological stance and environmental attitudes among a sample of UK churchgoers. Journal of Empirical Theology 28 (1): 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1163/15709256-12341321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Village, Andrew. unpublished manuscript. What does the Liberal-Conservative scale measure? A study among clergy and laity in the Church of England.Google Scholar
  50. Village, Andrew, and Sylvia Baker. 2013a. Reasons given by UK churchgoers for their stance on evolution. Journal of Beliefs and Values 34 (2): 165–177.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2013.801652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Village, Andrew, and Sylvia Baker. 2013b. Rejection of Darwinian evolution among churchgoers in England: The effects of psychological type. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52 (3): 557–572.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Williams, James D. 2009. Belief versus acceptance: Why do people not believe in evolution? BioEssays 31 (11): 1255–1262.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.200900082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Religious Research Association, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.York St John UniversityYorkUK
  2. 2.University of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations