Advertisement

Review of Religious Research

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 65–80 | Cite as

The Origins of Religious Homophily in a Medium and Large School

  • J. Benjamin Cook
  • Philip Schwadel
  • Jacob E. Cheadle
Research Note
  • 137 Downloads

Abstract

How religion influences social interactions, and how social interactions influence religion, are fundamental questions to the sociology of religion. We address these processes and build on Cheadle and Schwadel’s (Soc Sci Res 41:1198–1212, 2012) analysis of selection and influence in religion-based social tie homogeneity (i.e. network–religion autocorrelation) in small schools by analyzing networks from larger schools, by focusing on differences across schools, and by testing different operationalizations of social influence. Using two waves of full network data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health and dynamic longitudinal network SIENA models, we find (1) that both selection and influence impact network–religion autocorrelation; (2) that the factors influencing network–religion autocorrelation vary across school contexts; and (3) that religious influence is proportional to the number of friends in an adolescent’s network, which means influence reflects both the size of an individual’s network and the consistency of religion among members of the network. We conclude by addressing potential reasons for differences across school contexts and by discussing the theoretical logic behind the total similarity effect that best operationalized religious influence.

Keywords

Social networks Religion Adolescents Schools Social selection Social influence 

References

  1. Adamczyk, Amy, and Jacob Felson. 2006. Friends’ religiosity and first sex. Social Science Research 35: 924–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyatzis, Chris J., and Denise L. Janicki. 2003. Parent-child communication about religion: Survey and diary data on unilateral transmission and bi-directional reciprocity styles. Review of Religious Research 44: 252–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheadle, Jacob E., and Bridget J. Goosby. 2012. The small-school friendship dynamics of adolescent depressive symptoms. Society and Mental Health 2: 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheadle, Jacob E., and Philip Schwadel. 2012. The ‘friendship dynamics of religion’, or the ‘religious dynamics of friendship’? A social network analysis of adolescents who attend small schools. Social Science Research 41: 1198–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheadle, Jacob E., Michael Stevens, Deadric T. Williams, and Bridget J. Goosby. 2013. The differential contributions of teen drinking homophily to new and existing friendships: An empirical assessment of assortative and proximity selection mechanisms. Social Science Research 42: 1297–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheadle, Jacob E., and Deadric Williams. 2013. The role of drinking in new and existing friendships across high school settings. Health 05: 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornwall, Marie. 1989. The determinants of religious behavior: A theoretical model and empirical test. Social Forces 68: 572–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Durkheim, Emile. 1965[1915]. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ebaugh, Helen Rose Fuchs, and Sharron Lee Vaughn. 1984. Ideology and recruitment in religious groups. Review of Religious Research 26: 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friemel, Thomas N. (ed.). 2008. Why context matters: Applications of social network analysis. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  11. Goodreau, Steven M., James A. Kitts, and Martina Morris. 2009. Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography 46: 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris, Kathleen Mullan, Carolyn Tucker Halpern, Pamela Entzel, Joyce Tabor, Peter S. Bearman, and J. Richard Udry. 2008. The national longitudinal study of adolescent health: Research design. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design.
  13. Kiuru, Noona, William J. Burk, Brett Laursen, Katariina Salmela-Aro, and Jari-Erik Nurmi. 2010. Pressure to drink but not to smoke: Disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. Journal of Adolescence 33(6): 801–812.Google Scholar
  14. Kox, Willem, Wim Meeus, and Harm’t Hart. 1991. Religious conversion of adolescents: Testing the Lofland and stark model of religious conversion. Sociological Analysis 52: 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lim, Chaeyoon, and Robert D. Putnam. 2010. Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. American Sociological Review 75: 914–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lofland, John, and Rodney Stark. 1965. Becoming a world-saver: A theory of conversion to a deviant perspective. American Sociological Review 30: 862–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Louch, Hugh. 2000. Personal network integration: Transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations. Social Networks 22: 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moran, P.A.P. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37: 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. National Center for Education Statistics, Information on Public Schools and School Districts in the United States, National Center for Education Statistics, Retrieved September, 2011. http://www.nces.ed.gov/ccd/.
  21. Niebuhr, H.Richard. 1929. The social sources of denominationalism. Gloucester: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
  22. Pew Research Center. 2014. The shifting religious identity of latinos in the United States. http://www.pewforum.org/files/2014/05/Latinos-Religion-07-22-full-report.pdf. Accessed 13 Nov 2015.
  23. Ripley, Ruth M., Tom A. B. Snijders, and Paulina Preciado Lopez. 2011. Manual for RSIENA. University of Oxford: Department of Statistics, Nuffield College: http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/siena/RSiena_Manual.pdf.
  24. Schwadel, Philip. 2005. Individual, congregational, and denominational effects on church members’ civic participation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44(2): 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schwadel, Philip. 2011. Age, period, and cohort effects on religious activities and beliefs. Social Science Research 40: 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwadel, Philip. 2012. Race, class, congregational embeddedness, and civic and political participation. Research in the Sociology of Work 23: 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwadel, Philip, Jacob E. Cheadle, Sarah E. Malone, and Michael Stout. 2016. Social networks and civic participation and efficacy in two evangelical protestant churches. Review of Religious Research 58(2): 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schweinberger, Michael. 2012. Statistical modelling of network panel data: Goodness of fit. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 65: 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sherkat, Darren E. 2003. Religious socialization: Sources of influence and influences of agency. In Handbook of the sociology of religion, ed. Michele Dillon, 151–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Simmel, Georg. 1905. A contribution to the sociology of religion. American Journal of Sociology 11: 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, Christian. 1998. American evangelicalism: Embattled and thriving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, Christian. 2003. Religious participation and network closure among American adolescents. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42: 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Snijders, Tom A.B., Christian Steglich, and Michael Schweinberger. 2007. Modeling the coevolution of networks and behavior. In Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences, ed. K.V. Montfort, J. Oud, and A. Satorra, 41–71. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Snow, David A., Louis A. Zurcher Jr., and Sheldon Ekland-Olson. 1980. Social networks and social movements: A microstructural approach to differential recruitment. American Sociological Review 45(5): 787–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stark, Rodney, and William Sims Bainbridge. 1980. Networks of faith: Interpersonal bonds and recruitment to cults and sects. The American Journal of Sociology 85(6): 1376–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Steensland, Brian, Jerry Z. Park, Mark D. Regnerus, Lynn D. Robinson, W. Bradford Wilcox, and Robert D. Woodberry. 2000. The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces 79: 291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steglich, Christian, Tom A.B. Snijders, and Michael Pearson. 2010. Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology 40: 329–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vaisey, Stephen, and Omar Lizardo. 2010. Can cultural worldviews influence network composition? Social Forces 88: 1595–1618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. White, R.H. 1968. Toward a theory of religious influence. Pacific Sociological Review 11(1): 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wrzus, Cornelia, Martha Hänel, Jenny Wagner, and Franz J. Neyer. 2013. Social network changes and life events across the life span: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 39(1): 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wuthnow, Robert. 1988. The restructuring of american religion: Society and faith since World War II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wuthnow, Robert. 2005. America and the challenges of religious diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Religious Research Association, Inc. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Benjamin Cook
    • 1
  • Philip Schwadel
    • 2
  • Jacob E. Cheadle
    • 2
  1. 1.HudlLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations