Abstract
A primary concern in the psychology of religion is the distinct possibility that responses to empirical assessments of individuals’ degree and type of religiosity and spirituality are exaggerated owing to social desirability bias. In spite of increased secularization in American culture and a growing distrust of organized religion, religious involvement, personal religiosity, and spirituality are still viewed as highly desirable characteristics. This study estimates the extent of social desirability biases that affect self-reports of religion and spirituality by utilizing a bogus pipeline procedure. In this procedure, participants are convinced that experimenters can detect disingenuous responses to individual items on questionnaires through the use of physiological measures, although no physiological data are actually collected. If the self-reports of participants in the bogus pipeline condition indicate greater religiosity or spirituality than those in the control condition, self-report bias is indicated. The bogus pipeline procedure has been used in other areas of study to increase veracity of self-reports when social desirability effects are present (such as reporting sexual behaviors or prejudice). The results indicate that social desirability biases influence multiple constructs including religious orientations, religious coping, and daily spiritual experiences. Implications for future research relying on self-reports of religion and spirituality are discussed.
References
Allport, G.W. 1950. The individual and his religion. New York: Macmillan.
Allport, G.W., and J.M. Ross. 1967. Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5: 432–443.
Altemeyer, B., and B. Hunsberger. 1992. Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2: 113–133.
Batson, C.D., S.J. Naifeh, and S. Pate. 1978. SDR, religious orientation, and racial prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 17: 31–41.
Batson, C.D., and P.A. Schoenrade. 1991. Measuring religion as Quest: I. Validity concerns. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 30: 416–429.
Batson, C.D., P.A. Schoenrade, and W.L. Ventis. 1993. Dimensions of individual religion. Religion and the individual, 155–190. New York: Oxford University Press.
Batson, C.D., and W.L. Ventis. 1982. The religious experience: A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brenner, P.S. 2011. Identity importance and the overreporting of religious service attendance: Multiple imputation of religious attendance using the American Time Use Study and the General Social Survey. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 50: 103–115. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01554.x.
Brunell, A.B., and T.D. Fisher. 2014. Using the bogus pipeline to investigate grandiose narcissism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 55: 37–42.
Cox, D., R.P. Jones, and J. Navarro-Rivera. 2014. I know what you did last Sunday: Measuring SDR bias in self-report religious behavior, belief, and identity. Washington, D.C: Public Religion Research Institute.
Donahue, M.J. 1985. Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48: 400–419.
Duck, R.J., and B. Hunsberger. 1999. Religious orientation and prejudice: The role of religious proscription, right-wing authoritarianism, and SDR. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 9: 157–179.
Ellison, C.W. 1983. Spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Psychology and Theology 11: 330–340.
Fisher, T.D. 2013. Gender roles and pressure to be truthful: The bogus pipeline modifies gender differences in sexual but not non-sexual behavior. Sex Roles 68: 401–414. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0266-3.
Fullerton, J.T., and B. Hunsberger. 1982. A unidimensional measure of Christian orthodoxy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 21: 317–326.
Genia, V. 1996. I, E, quest, and fundamentalism as predictors of psychological and spiritual well-being. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 35: 56–64.
Gorsuch, R.L., and S.E. McPherson. 1989. Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-Revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 28: 348–354. doi:10.2307/1386745.
Hadaway, C.K., P.L. Marler, and M. Chaves. 1993. What the polls don’t show: A closer look at U.S. church attendance. American Sociological Review 58: 741.
Hodge, D.R. 2015. Spiritual assessment in social work and mental health practice. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hood, R.J., P.C. Hill, and B. Spilka. 2009. The psychology of religion: An empirical approach, 4th ed. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
Hunsberger, B. 1989. A short version of the Christian orthodoxy scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 28: 360–365.
Hunsberger, B., and J. Ennis. 1982. Experimenter effects in studies of religious attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 21: 131.
Kirkpatrick, L.A. 1992. An attachment-theory approach psychology of religion. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2: 3–28. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr0201_2.
Kirkpatrick, L.A. 1993. Fundamentalism, Christian orthodox, and intrinsic orientation as predictors of discriminatory attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 32: 256–268.
Kirkpatrick, L.A., R.W. Hood Jr., and G.W. Hartz. 1991. Fundamentalist religion conceptualized in terms of Rokeach’s theory of open and closed mind: New perspectives on some old ideas. In Research in the social scientific study of religion, vol. 3, ed. M.L. Lynn, and D.O. Moberg, 157–179. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Koenig, H.G. 2008. Concerns about measuring “spirituality” in research. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 196: 349–355.
Krauss, S.W., and R.W. Hood. 2013. A new approach to religious orientation: The commitment-reflectivity circumplex. Amsterdam: Brill Academic Publishers.
Leak, G.K., and S. Fish. 1989. Religious orientation, impression management, and self-deception: Toward a clarification of the link between religiosity and SDR. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 28: 355–359.
McFarland, S.G. 1989. Religious orientations and the targets of discrimination. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 28(3): 324–336.
Paloutzian, R.F., and C.W. Ellison. 1982. Loneliness, spiritual well-being, and quality of life. In Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy, ed. L.A. Peplau, and D. Perlman. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Pargament, K.I. 1997. The psychology of religion and coping. New York: Guilford Press.
Pargament, K.I. 1999. The psychology of religion and spirituality? Yes and no. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 9: 3–16. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr0901_2.
Pargament, K.I., H.G. Koenig, and L.M. Perez. 2000. The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology 56: 519–543. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200004)56:4<519:AID-JCLP6>3.0.CO;2-1.
Pew Research Center. 2015. America’s Changing Religious Landscape. Retrieved from Pew Research Center America’s Changing Religious Landscape report website: http://www.pewforum.org/files/2015/05/RLS-08-26-full-report.pdf.
Roese, N.J., and D.W. Jamieson. 1993. Twenty years of bogus pipeline research: A critical review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 114: 363–375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.363.
Rowatt, W.C., and L.A. Kirkpatrick. 2002. Two dimensions of attachment to God and their relation to affect, religiosity, and personality constructs. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41: 637–651.
Rowatt, W.C., and D.P. Schmitt. 2003. Associations between religious orientation and varieties of sexual experience. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42: 455–465.
Rowatt, W.C., L.M. Franklin, and M. Cotton. 2005. Patterns and personality correlates of implicit and explicit attitudes toward Christians and Muslims. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44: 29–43.
Saad, L. 2012. U.S. confidence in organized religion at low point; Catholics’ confidence remains significantly lower than Protestants’. Gallup Poll News Service.
Sedikides, C., and J.E. Gebauer. 2010. Religiosity as self-enhancement: A meta-analysis of the relation between socially desirable responding and religiosity. Personality and Social Psychology Review 14: 17–36.
Spilka, B. & McIntosh, D.N. 1996. Religion and spirituality: The known and the unknown. In Paper presented at the American Psychological Association annual conference, Toronto, Canada.
Trimble, D.E. 1997. The religious orientation scale: Review and meta-analysis of SDR effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement 57: 970–986.
Tsang, J., and W.C. Rowatt. 2007. The relationship between religious orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, and implicit sexual prejudice. International Journal of the Psychology of Religion 17: 99–120.
Underwood, L.G., and J.A. Teresi. 2002. The daily spiritual experience scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 24: 22–33. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_04.
Watson, P.J., R.W. Hood, and R.J. Morris. 1985. Dimensions of religiosity and empathy. Journal of Psychology and Christianity 4: 73–85.
Watson, P.J., R.J. Morris, J.E. Foster, and R.W. Hood Jr. 1986. Religiosity and SDR. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 25: 215–232.
Wilkinson, W.W. 2004. Religiosity, authoritarianism, and homophobia: A multidimensional approach. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 14: 55–67. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr1401_5.
Wulff, D.M. 1996. The psychology of religion: An overview. In Religion and the clinical practice of psychology, ed. E.P. Shafranske, 43–70. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Yancey, G.A. 2011. Compromising scholarship: Religious and political bias in American higher education. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
Zinnbauer, B.J., K.I. Pargament, and A.B. Scott. 1999. The emerging meanings of religiousness and spirituality: Problems and prospects. Journal of Personality 67: 889–919. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00077.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, A.E., Elliott, M. Examining Social Desirability in Measures of Religion and Spirituality Using the Bogus Pipeline. Rev Relig Res 59, 47–64 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-016-0261-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-016-0261-6