Advertisement

Apidologie

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 473–483 | Cite as

No evidence for an inbreeding avoidance system in the bumble bee Bombus terrestris

  • Gherardo Bogo
  • Natasha de Manincor
  • Alessandro Fisogni
  • Marta Galloni
  • Laura Zavatta
  • Laura Bortolotti
Original article
  • 113 Downloads

Abstract

Inbreeding is caused by the mating of closely related individuals and may produce a decrease in the fitness of offspring and have deleterious consequences for adults. In haplodiploid social Hymenoptera inbreeding has a further negative effect due to the production of unviable or sterile diploid males. As a consequence, mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance would be expected to evolve. In this study, we investigated the mating choice between related (inbred) or unrelated (outbred) gynes and males of Bombus terrestris reared in laboratory conditions by performing cage and tunnel experiments. Not only did we find no mating preference for related or unrelated partners (mating success 41.55 ± 3.7 and 39.69 ± 4.4%, respectively), but the mating latency was even shorter in inbred (6.97 ± 0.6 min) than in outbred matings (8.74 ± 0.8 min). We hypothesize that in wild populations of B. terrestris, the lack of incest avoidance could be compensated by tolerance of high levels of inbreeding.

Keywords

Bombus terrestris inbreeding incest avoidance kin recognition mating preference 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out as part of the Life+ Project PP-ICON (Plant-Pollinator CONservation approach: a demonstrative proposal—LIFE09/NAT/IT000212), funded by the European Union. We thank Bioplanet s.c.a. for supplying the colonies, Mariachiara Zanichelli and Luca Galeotti for helping with bumble bee rearing, and Dr. Fabio Sgolastra for the precious help with statistics. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for comments on an early version of the manuscript.

Authors contribution

GB and LB conceived this research and designed experiments; GB, NdM, AF, MG, and LB participated in the design and interpretation of the data; GB, LB, NdM, and LZ carried out experiments and analysis; GB, NdM, AF, MG, LZ, and LB wrote the paper and participated in the revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amin, M. R., Kwon, Y. J., Suh, S. J. (2007) Photoperiodic influence on the body mass of bumblebee, Bombus terrestris and its copulation duration. J. Appl. Entomol. 131 (8), 537–541Google Scholar
  2. Amin, M. R., Than, K. K., Kwon, Y. J. (2010) Mating status of bumblebees, Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) with notes on ambient temperature, age and virginity. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 45 (3), 363–367Google Scholar
  3. Amin, M. R., Bussière, L. F., Goulson, D. (2012) Effects of male age and size on mating success in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. J. Insect. Behav. 25 (4), 362–374Google Scholar
  4. Ayasse, M., Jarau, S. (2014) Chemical ecology of bumble bees. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 59, 299–319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baer, B., Maile, R., Schmid-Hempel, P., Morgan, E. D., Jones, G. R. (2000) Chemistry of a mating plug in bumblebees. J. Chem. Ecol. 26 (8), 1869–1875Google Scholar
  6. Baer, B., Morgan, E. D., Schmid-Hempel, P. (2001) A non-specific fatty acid within the bumblebee mating plug prevents females from remating. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 98 (7), 3926–3928PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Baer, B. (2003) Bumblebees as model organisms to study male sexual selection in social insects. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54 (6), 521–533Google Scholar
  8. Barrett, S. C. H., Charlesworth, D. (1991) Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352 (6335), 522–524PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Beekman, M., Van Stratum, P., Veerman, A. (1999) Selection for non-diapause in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris, with notes on the effect of inbreeding. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 93 (1), 69–75Google Scholar
  10. Bergman, P., Bergström, G. (1997) Scent marking, scent origin, and species specificity in male premating behavior of two Scandinavian bumblebees. J. ChemEcol. 23 (5), 1235–1251Google Scholar
  11. Blacher, P., Boreggio, L., Leroy, C., Devienne, P., Châline, N., Chameron, S. (2013) Specific recognition of reproductive parasite workers by nest-entrance guards in the bumble bee Bombus terrestris. Front. Zool. 10 (1), 74PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Bogo, G., de Manincor, N., Fisogni, A., Galloni, M., Bortolotti, L. (2017) Effects of queen mating status, pre-diapause weight and pupae’s sex on colony initiation in small-scale rearing of Bombus terrestris. Apidologie 1–10.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, M. J. F., Baer, B., Schmid-Hempel, R., Schmid-Hempel, P. (2002) Dynamics of multiple-mating in the bumble bee Bombus hypnorum. Insectes Soc. 49 (4), 315–319Google Scholar
  14. Brown, M. J. F., Baer, B. (2005) The evolutionary significance of long copulation duration in bumble bees. Apidologie 36 (2), 157–167Google Scholar
  15. Buckle, G. R., Greenberg, L. (1981) Nestmate recognition in sweat bees (Lasioglossum zephyrum): does an individual recognize its own odour or only odours of its nestmates?. Anim. Behav. 29 (3), 802–809Google Scholar
  16. Charlesworth, D., Charlesworth, B. (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18 (1), 237–268Google Scholar
  17. Charlesworth, D., Willis, J. H. (2009) The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10 (11), 783–796PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Coppée, A., Terzo, M., Valterova, I., Rasmont, P. (2008) Intraspecific variation of the cephalic labial gland secretions in Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Chem. Biodivers. 5 (12), 2654–2661PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Darvill, B., Ellis, J. S., Lye, G. C., Goulson, D. (2006) Population structure and inbreeding in a rare and declining bumblebee, Bombus muscorum (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Mol. Ecol. 15 (3), 601–611PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Darvill, B., Lepais, O., Woodall, L. C., Goulson, D. (2012) Triploid bumblebees indicate a direct cost of inbreeding in fragmented populations. Mol. Ecol. 21 (16), 3988–3995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Djegham, Y., Verhaeghe, J. C., Rasmont, P. (1994) Copulation of Bombus terrestris L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in captivity. J. Apic. Res. 33 (1), 15–20Google Scholar
  22. Duchateau, M. J., Hoshiba, H., Velthuis, H. H. (1994) Diploid males in the bumble bee Bombus terrestris. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 71 (3), 263–269Google Scholar
  23. Duchateau, M. J., Marien, J. (1995) Sexual biology of haploid and diploid males in the bumble bee Bombus terrestris. Insectes Soc. 42 (3), 255–266Google Scholar
  24. Duvoisin, N., Baer, B., Schmid-Hempel, P. (1999) Sperm transfer and male competition in a bumblebee. Anim. Behav. 58 (4), 743–749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ellis, J. S., Knight, M. E., Darvill, B., Goulson, D. (2006) Extremely low effective population sizes, genetic structuring and reduced genetic diversity in a threatened bumblebee species, Bombus sylvarum (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Mol. Ecol. 15 (14), 4375–4386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Estoup, A., Scholl, A., Pouvreau, A., Solignac, M. (1995) Monoandry and polyandry in bumble bees (Hymenoptera; Bombinae) as evidenced by highly variable microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 4 (1), 89–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Foster, R. L. (1992) Nestmate recognition as an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 65 (3), 238–243Google Scholar
  28. Gamboa, G. J., Reeve, H. K., Ferguson, I. D., Wacker, T. L. (1986) Nestmate recognition in social wasps: the origin and acquisition of recognition odours. Anim. Behav. 34 (3), 685–695Google Scholar
  29. Gerloff, C. U., Ottmer, B. K., Schmid-Hempel, P. (2003) Effects of inbreeding on immune response and body size in a social insect, Bombus terrestris. Funct. Ecol. 17 (5), 582–589Google Scholar
  30. Gerloff, C. U., Schmid-Hempel, P. (2005) Inbreeding depression and family variation in a social insect, Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Oikos 111 (1), 67–80Google Scholar
  31. Getz, W. M., Smith, K. B. (1986) Honey bee kin recognition: learning self and nestmate phenotypes. Anim. Behav. 34 (6), 1617–1626Google Scholar
  32. Goulson, D. (2010) Bumblebees: behaviour, ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Gosterit, A. (2016) Adverse effect of inbreeding on colony foundation success in bumblebee, Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 51, 521–526Google Scholar
  34. Gosterit, A., Gurel, F., (2016) Male remating and its influences on queen colony foundation success in the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris. Apidologie 47 (6), 828–834Google Scholar
  35. Keller, L., Passera, L. (1993) Incest avoidance, fluctuating asymmetry, and the consequences of inbreeding in Iridomyrmex humilis, an ant with multiple queen colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33 (3), 191–199Google Scholar
  36. Keller, L., Ross, K. G. (1998) Selfish genes: a green beard in the red fire ant. Nature 394 (6693), 573–575Google Scholar
  37. Kokko, H., Ots, I. (2006) When not to avoid inbreeding. Evol. 60 (3), 467–475Google Scholar
  38. Kraus, F. B., Wolf, S., Moritz, R. F. A. (2009) Male flight distance and population substructure in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. J. Anim. Ecol. 78 (1), 247–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuo, T. H., Yew, J. Y., Fedina, T. Y., Dreisewerd, K., Dierick, H. A., Pletcher, S. D. (2012) Aging modulates cuticular hydrocarbons and sexual attractiveness in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 215 (5), 814–821PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Kwon, Y. J., Amin, M. R., Suh, S. J. (2006) Mating propensity of Bombus terrestris reared in different photoperiodic regimes. Apidologie 37 (6), 679–686Google Scholar
  41. Lacy, R. C., Petric, A., Warneke, M. (1993) Inbreeding and outbreeding in captive populations of wild animal species, in: Thornhill, N. W. (ed.) The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding: theoretical and empirical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 352–374Google Scholar
  42. Liebert, A. E., Johnson, R. N., Switz, G. T., Starks, P. T. (2004) Triploid females and diploid males: underreported phenomena in Polistes wasps? Insectes Soc. 51 (3), 205–211Google Scholar
  43. Liebert, A. E., Wilson-Rich, N., Johnson, C. E., Starks, P. T. (2010) Sexual interactions and nestmate recognition in invasive populations of Polistes dominulus wasps. Insectes Soc. 57 (4), 457–463Google Scholar
  44. Lihoreau, M,, Zimmer, C., Rivault, C. (2007) Kin recognition and incest avoidance in a group-living insect. Behav. Ecol. 18 (5), 880–887Google Scholar
  45. Lihoreau, M., Rivault, C. (2010) German cockroach males maximize their inclusive fitness by avoiding mating with kin. Anim. Behav. 80 (2), 303–309Google Scholar
  46. Martin, S. J., Carruthers, J. M., Williams, P. H., Drijfhout, F. P. (2010) Host specific social parasites (Psithyrus) indicate chemical recognition system in bumblebees. J. Chem. Ecol. 36 (8), 855–863PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pusey, A., Wolf, M. (1996) Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11 (5), 201–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rasmont, P., Terzo, M., Aytekin, A. M., Hines, H., Urbanova, K., Cahlikova, L., Valterova, I. (2005) Cephalic secretions of the bumblebee subgenus Sibiricobombus Vogt suggest Bombus niveatus Kriechbaumer and Bombus vorticosus Gerstaecker are conspecific (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombus). Apidologie 36 (4), 571–84Google Scholar
  49. Rasmont, P., Coppée, A., Michez, D., De Meulemeester, T. (2008) An overview of the Bombus terrestris (L. 1758) subspecies (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 44 (2), 243–250Google Scholar
  50. Ross, K. G., Fletcher, D. J. C. (1986) Diploid male production—a significant colony mortality factor in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19 (4), 283–291Google Scholar
  51. Rottler, A. M., Schulz, S., Ayasse, M. (2013) Wax lipids signal nest identity in bumblebee colonies. J. Chem. Ecol. 39 (1), 67–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sauter, A., Brown, M. J. F. (2001) To copulate or not? The importance of female status and behavioural variation in predicting copulation in a bumblebee. Anim. Behav. 62 (2), 221–226Google Scholar
  53. Schmid-Hempel, R., Schmid-Hempel, P. (2000) Female mating frequencies in Bombus spp. from Central Europe. Insectes Soc. 47 (1), 36–41Google Scholar
  54. Schmid-Hempel, P., Schmid-Hempel, R., Brunner, P. C., Seeman, O. D., Allen, G. R. (2007) Invasion success of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, despite a drastic genetic bottleneck. Heredity 99 (4), 414–422PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith, B. H., Ayasse, M. (1987) Kin-based male mating preferences in two species of halictine bee. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20 (5), 313–318Google Scholar
  56. Tabadkani, S. M., Nozari, J., Lihoreau, M. (2012) Inbreeding and the evolution of sociality in arthropods. Naturwissenschaften 99 (10), 779–788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tasei, J. N., Moinard, C., Moreau, L., Himpens, B., Guyonnaud, S. (1998) Relationship between aging, mating and sperm production in captive Bombus terrestris. J. Apic. Res. 37 (2), 107–113Google Scholar
  58. Van Wilgenburg, E., Driessen, G., Beukeboom, L. W. (2006) Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an “unintelligent” design. Front. Zool. 3 (1), 1PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Whitehorn, P. R., Tinsley, M. C., Brown, M. J., Darvill, B., Goulson, D. (2009a) Impacts of inbreeding on bumblebee colony fitness under field conditions. BMC Evol. Biol. 9 (1), 152PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Whitehorn, P. R., Tinsley, M. C., Goulson, D. (2009b) Kin recognition and inbreeding reluctance in bumblebees. Apidologie 40 (6), 627–633Google Scholar
  61. Whitehorn, P. R., Tinsley, M. C., Brown, M. J., Darvill, B., Goulson, D. (2011) Genetic diversity, parasite prevalence and immunity in wild bumblebees. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 278 (1709), 1195–1202Google Scholar
  62. Williams, M. R., Abbott, I., Liddelow, G. L., Vellios, C., Wheeler, I. B., Mellican, A. E. (2001) Recovery of bird populations after clearfelling of tall open eucalypt forest in Western Australia. J Appl Ecol 38(5), 910–920Google Scholar
  63. Wolf, S., Toev, T., Moritz, R. L. V., Moritz, R. F. A. (2012) Spatial and temporal dynamics of the male effective population size in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Popul. Ecol. 54 (1), 115–124Google Scholar
  64. Zanette, L. R. S., Miller, S. D. L., Faria, C. M. A., Lopez-Vaamonde, C. L., Bourke, A. F. G. (2014) Bumble bee workers drift to conspecific nests at field scales. Ecol. Entomol. 39 (3), 347–354Google Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agrariaCentro di ricerca agricoltura e ambiente (CREA-AA)BolognaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze Biologiche, Geologiche e AmbientaliUniversità di BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Univ. Lille, CNRSLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations