Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 251–261 | Cite as

Morphological and genetic diversity of Moringa oleifera and Moringa peregrina genotypes

  • Anber Mahmoud Ahmed Hassanein
  • Abdulrahman Abdulah Al-Soqeer
Research Report Genetics and Breeding


This study aimed to assess the diversity of Moringa oleifera and Moringa peregrina in Saudi Arabia. Seven genotypes per species were characterized morphologically using 14 morphological characteristics and genetically using 10 ISSR primers. The studied genotypes were classified according to each characterization, and the correlation between morphological and genetic diversity was investigated. M. oleifera genotypes were distinguished by long, thick stems with more crown spread, and larger pinnate leaf area compared to those of M. peregrina. Plant height and pinnate dimensions were the most pertinent indicators for the discrimination among genotypes where they were correlated to all morphological characteristics and gave representative classification. Diversity was found between the two species and among the genotypes of each species. The ISSR molecular markers were effective in the characterization of genetic diversity of Moringa where the average of polymorphism across the 14 genotypes was sufficient (90.8%). Dinucleotide repeat (AC)n primers (UBC825, UBC826 and UBC827) and a trinucleotide primer (UBC864) were the best primers, regenerating the maximum number of polymorphic bands per primer (8–10) and the highest polymorphism level among genotypes (91–100%). Principal coordinate analysis showed similar classification for morphological and molecular data where the two species were separated in two main clusters with three sub-clusters per species. The association analysis showed good correlation, up to a 0.84 determination coefficient, between genetic diversity and morphological variability. The primers UBC826 and UBC827 were the most informative markers, revealing correlations with 12 morphological characteristics. The results of the present study provide valuable morphological and molecular characterizations of the two most important Moringa species. Efficient morphological classification based on three characteristics could facilitate the evaluation of diversity in Moringa. Genetic diversity could be simply assessed using the two best ISSR primers (UBC826 and UBC827). The diversity found among genotypes could be of great importance for the selection of clones with desirable characteristics for further improvements of Moringa.


Drumstick Life tree Classification ISSR Molecular marker Variability 



The authors are grateful to the deanship of scientific research, Qassim University, KSA for funding the research. They also thank Prof. Dr. Mousa H.M. for revising the English language of the manuscript.


  1. Alaklabi A (2015) Genetic diversity of Moringa peregrina species in Saudi Arabia with ITS sequences. Saudi J Biol Sci 22:186–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Humaid A, Motawei MI, Abdalla MY, Mana F (2004) Detection of genetic variation and fusarium resistance in turfgrass genotypes using PCR-based markers (ISSR and SCAR). Food Agric Environ 2(3&4):225–229Google Scholar
  3. Al-Soqeer A, Motawei MI, Al-Dakhil M, El-Mergawi R, Al-Khalifah N (2012) Genetic variation and chemical traits of selected new jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis (Link) Schneider) genotypes. J Am Oil Chem Soc 89:1455–1461Google Scholar
  4. Ben El Maati F, Jlibene M, Moummi M (2004) Study of the polymorphism of common wheat using ISSR markers. Food Agric Environ 3:121–125Google Scholar
  5. Ganesan SK, Singh R, Choudhury DR, Bharadwaj J, Gupta V, Singode A (2014) Genetic diversity and population structure study of drumstick (Moringa oleifera Lam.) using morphological and SSR markers. Ind Crop Prod 60:316–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gopalakrishnan L, Doriya K, Kumar DS (2016) Moringa oleifera: a review on nutritive importance and its medicinal application. Food Sci Hum Wellness 5:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleotologia Electronica 4(1):9Google Scholar
  8. Hassanein AMA (2015) Assessment of some important tree species for production under arid zones conditions. World J Agric Sci 11(5):325–330Google Scholar
  9. Hassanein A, Dorion N (2006) Determining morphological and physiological parameters for the selection of drought-tolerant geraniums (Pelargonium x hortorum LH Bailey). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 81(4):707–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kordrostami M, Rabiei B, Kumleh HH (2016) Association analysis, genetic diversity and haplotyping of rice plants under salt stress using SSR markers linked to SalTol and morpho-physiological characteristics. Plant Syst Evol 302:871–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leone A, Spada A, Battezzati A, Schiraldi A, Aristil J, Bertoli S (2015) Cultivation, genetic, ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Moringa oleifera leaves: an overview. Int J Mol Sci 16:12791–12835CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Manly KF, Cudmore RH, Meer JM (2001) Map Manager QTX, cross-platform software for genetic mapping. Mamm Genome 12:930–932CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mridha MAU (2015) Prospects of moringa cultivation in Saudi Arabia. J Appl Environ Biol Sci 5(3):39–46Google Scholar
  14. Nagaoka T, Ogihara Y (1997) Applicability of inter-simple sequence repeat polymorphism in wheat for use as DNA markers in comparison to RFLP and RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 94:597–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nagaraju J, Kathirvel M, Ramesh-Kumar R, Siddiq EA, Hasnain SE (2002) Genetic analysis of traditional and evolved basmati and non-basmati rice varieties by using fluorescence-based ISSRPCR and SSR markers. PNAS 99:5836–5841CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Noroozisharaf A, Hatamzadeh A, Lahiji HS, Bakhshi D (2015) Genetic diversity of endangered primrose (Primula heterochroma Stapf.) accessions from Iran revealed by ISSR and IRAP markers. Sci Hortic 190:173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nouman W, Basra SMA, Siddiqui MT, Yasmeen A, Gull T, Alcayde MAC (2014) Potential of Moringa oleifera L. as livestock fodder crop: a review. Turk J Agric For 38:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nouman W, Anwar F, Gull T, Newton A, Rosa E, Domínguez-Perles R (2016) Profiling of polyphenolics, nutrients and antioxidant potential of germplasm’s leaves from seven cultivars of Moringa oleifera Lam. Ind Crop Prod 83:166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Osman HE, Abohassan AA (2012) Morphological and analytical characterization of Moringa peregrina populations in Western Saudi Arabia. Int J Theor Appl Sci 4(2):174–184Google Scholar
  20. Palada MC, Chang LC, Yang RY, Engle LM (2007) Introduction and varietal screening of drumstick tree (Moringa spp.) for horticultural traits and adaptation in Taiwan. Acta Hortic 752:249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saini RK, Saad KR, Ravishankar GA, Giridhar P, Shetty NP (2013) Genetic diversity of commercially grown Moringa oleifera Lam. cultivars from India by RAPD, ISSR and cytochrome P450-based markers. Plant Syst Evol 299:1205–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sanchez H, Loarce JA, Ferrer E (1996) Simple sequence repeat primers used in polymerase chain reaction amplification to study genetic diversity in barley. Genome 39:112–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sedra MH, Lashermes P, Trouslot P, Combes MC, Hamon S (1998) Identification and genetic diversity analysis of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) varieties from Morocco using RAPD markers. Euphytica 103:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharla N, Bobba S, Siddiq EA (2003) ISSR and SSR markers based on AG and GA repeats delineate geographically diverse Oryza nivara accessions and reveal rare alleles. Curr Sci 84:683–690Google Scholar
  25. Trifi M, Rhouma A, Marrakchi M (2000) Polygenic relationships in Tunisian date-palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) germplasm collection using DNA amplification fingerprinting. Agronomie 20:665–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zaghloul MS, Abd El-Wahab RH, Moustafa AA (2010) Ecological assessment and phenotypic and fitness variation of Sinai’s populations of Moringa peregrina. Appl Ecol Environ Res 8(4):351–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Horticultural Science and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anber Mahmoud Ahmed Hassanein
    • 1
    • 2
  • Abdulrahman Abdulah Al-Soqeer
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Production and Protection Department, College of Agriculture and Veterinary MedicineQassim UniversityBuraidahSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Horticulture Department, Agriculture FacultySohag UniversitySohagEgypt

Personalised recommendations